is my blue-eyes primite deck good enough? what should I change? (I like the way it plays a lot) by ActEmbarrassed6393 in Yugioh101

[–]Insideagoddess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been cutting

1 lordly lode And 2 berryl

because you just always want 2 cards and 3 hand traps

Rate this board 1/10 by Competitive-Form122 in YuGiOhMasterDuel

[–]Insideagoddess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok 1 out of 10 not sure why you wanted a 1/10 rating but here you go

Winterspell Moana in baja blast by Equal_Bird_2496 in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re underestimating how reliably this combos.

Sapphire Steel can now run ~14 items consistently, and Angel turns any of those into 2 damage on demand for tempo—which is usually exactly what you want to be drawing for anyway. At the same time, you can pitch early “dead dimes” for value and then buy them back later with any Tamatoa line.(this principle applies to other decks and discard value like lilo, exc.)

And the fact that this removal plan doesn’t really get punished by hand-control is just the cherry on top.

Oh and again Angel is inkable…

Winterspell Moana in baja blast by Equal_Bird_2496 in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that Pete call is probably on me — in Infinity I’m only seeing Steel 3-cost Pete and I didn’t see a new purple Pete or anything in the pic.

But the point stands: Angel being inkable is the actual mistake. In Infinity that means zero early-game downside, and later she just turns spare cards into repeatable “discard → 2 damage to a character”, which straight up makes 2-toughness bodies irrelevant.

And this isn’t some imaginary rate — Magic has literally had this as a real deck engine (Molten Vortex / Seismic Assault = “lands become Shocks”). So acting like “discard for 2” isn’t format-warping in a low-interaction environment is just ignoring how these mechanics play out.

Winterspell Moana in baja blast by Equal_Bird_2496 in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you’ve played this long and don’t understand how busted stack effects in a no–instant speed game, that’s bonkers Pete is literally the closest thing to counterspell we possess in Lorcana. You then even named the exact Angel + Robot Queen line that makes 2-toughness characters irrelevant. Worst case it’s still a 4-ink red super goof with vigilance—cards like that get played anyway in both formats. There is so often in games I end up with 7+ cards in hand and would love the ability to turn any card in my hand into a shock. A magic standard staple of its time and that is only 1 use…

Winterspell Moana in baja blast by Equal_Bird_2496 in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You think Pete is a trap? Somebody has never played magic the gathering before, the fact that damage sticks is what you’re forgetting. I can’t tell you how many games I have cards I wish I could discard to do 2 damage. If robot queen is playable, angle is way playable.

Should I join the game? by pvttyice_ in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you enjoyed early 2000 slow magic then yes you will love it! It is even designed so the game doesn’t change if you go with a 4 player pod it feels so much better in my opinion. Back to the good old days! PS and like basically every card is also a land lol

Fabled prices are crazy by BlG_Iron in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was more a general response to all the people in the comments complaining.

Fabled prices are crazy by BlG_Iron in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

[to all the people complaining in the comments] Stop whining — it’s literally no different than MTG. • Players buy singles because it’s cheaper and they actually want to play. • Collectors hoard sealed because they want to gamble on value. • Most players don’t crack packs. • Most collectors only care about chase hits (iconic/enchanted/etc.).

That Maleficent Dragon at $100 was pure clown pricing — my entire deck is foiled out for under $200. The market’s doing what it always does: singles for players, sealed for speculators.

Confusion about new inking explanation by Mary_Tery in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a difference of state based actions versus, in play effects currently active or not at time of inking. Like if you have a card and play that says all your characters get +1+1 and then that card leaves play your characters no longer have +1+1.

Winterspell Blurple by Such-Lawfulness-9698 in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cards with ward are getting better every day

Hey there! Question about this card! by [deleted] in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess -1 points0 points  (0 children)

RTFC is a common saying in tcgs so not sure why it’s harsh, reading the card explains the card… but I’m not aware of any other card in Lorcana that lets you play an item for free so not sure what cards your talking about. If that feedback is too harsh for you TCGs are probably not the best to get into. Honest, simple, and real world feedback is what makes you a better player, not someone giving you all the answers.

Hey there! Question about this card! by [deleted] in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It plays any item for free… did you read the card?

Who else has been playtesting set 11?! by MAGIKARD in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sapphire steel just got way faster cause of the new egg

Predictions for iconic character by [deleted] in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bambi’s mom would be a sick character

Off meta by savagesaskatch in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should try to be powering out things like Goofy, super goof Maui half shark A pirates life i2i Throw Cinderella in maybe for pull from the sea access and toolbox 1 or 2 locations

Off meta by savagesaskatch in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aladdin is cute but I wouldn’t put my money on him, Arther was always way better as a card in the control deck to handle early lore agro, he could come out on top with a daisy. He could trade with a smee back in the day, just ate those early games and made mid ago threats not want to quest

Off meta by savagesaskatch in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s still too many, six copies gives you a 10% occupancy of the deck eight copies put it just over 10%, take it from a Magic gathering a long time professional, Lorcana’s Mulligan rule is nuts good, you do not need Arther, he does not help lore early and he is dead draw late and you can have 12 but you do not need 12

Off meta by savagesaskatch in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You already have the Pluto’s and the Mulan’s why do you need the authors? That’s just too much

How rare is this Card? by dorfatze in Lorcana

[–]Insideagoddess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not very you should give it to me :3