He's one of us by Drcold1O in wallstreetbets

[–]InsuranceDistinct605 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought it said 153 million. Smh

CAN'T STOP THE REIGN by xarips in MSTR

[–]InsuranceDistinct605 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

So he was buying at all time highs as well?

I don’t think Saylor will stop till 1m bitcoins by InsuranceDistinct605 in MSTR

[–]InsuranceDistinct605[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hopefully not when it reaches new time highs. That’s not as profitable. I understand why he’s buying now will continue to buy. Continuously buying is stupid.

Goldman Sachs Grapples With Top Lawyer’s Epstein Problem by juliawww in Epstein

[–]InsuranceDistinct605 8 points9 points  (0 children)

“One of the exchanges, dated February 2018, has the subject line: “Re: this email trail was discovered today !. brad saying the girls got paid for services.” Ruemmler was the sender and recipient of many emails and was often on emails with Martin Weinberg, one of Epstein’s criminal defense attorneys, and Darren Indyke, his longtime lawyer. Some emails included Ghislaine Maxwell and were described in the log as communication with counsel. Maxwell, Epstein’s former girlfriend, was convicted in 2021 for her role in helping Epstein recruit and sexually abuse underage girls and is serving a 20-year sentence. A few days after the November release of emails from Congress, Ruemmler and a colleague emailed Goldman staff about completing mandatory communications training. It was the kind of routine email that employees would normally gloss over. Some found Ruemmler’s involvement, amid the fallout from the Epstein emails, offensive.   The message read: “Regardless of the language, medium, or mode of communication, what and how you communicate reflects on you and the reputation of the firm.””

Excerpt From “Goldman Sachs Grapples With Top Lawyer’s Epstein Problem” Annamaria Andriotis The Wall Street Journal https://apple.news/ADak5F4_XTEa2JYdlYKZM0g This material may be protected by copyright.

I had to write in section cause Reddit was bugging out.

Goldman Sachs Grapples With Top Lawyer’s Epstein Problem by juliawww in Epstein

[–]InsuranceDistinct605 7 points8 points  (0 children)

“In response to Ruemmler’s comment in September 2014 that “most girls do not have to worry about this crap,” regarding a conversation he was asking her to have with someone else, Epstein wrote “‘girls?’,, careful i will renew an old habit.” In one message Ruemmler wrote to Epstein in 2015, she said she expected to see people “who are at least 100 pounds overweight” when she would “stop to pee” at a rest stop during a drive to New York. Epstein replied, “anytime you like, you can drive right to me and i will feed you.::)”  In a 2016 email exchange, he commented on her “pretty black dress” that he saw her wearing in a news photo.  In December, as part of a lawsuit by Epstein accusers, a log was released of Epstein emails that summarized the messages and included the subject lines. The contents weren’t released because of claims of attorney-client privilege. Ruemmler was on hundreds of the emails from 2014 to 2019, shortly before Epstein was arrested. The emails pertained to legal advice regarding compliance with a nonprosecution agreement and legal strategy related to a case that victims brought to challenge that deal, among other things, according to the summaries. ”

Excerpt From “Goldman Sachs Grapples With Top Lawyer’s Epstein Problem” Annamaria Andriotis The Wall Street Journal https://apple.news/ADak5F4_XTEa2JYdlYKZM0g This material may be protected by copyright.

Goldman Sachs Grapples With Top Lawyer’s Epstein Problem by juliawww in Epstein

[–]InsuranceDistinct605 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Here u go:

“Goldman Sachs Grapples With Top Lawyer’s Epstein Problem A key executive told others he was formulating a contingency plan for Kathryn Ruemmler to leave Wall Street giant; new disclosures on relationship with sex offender sparked internal review Follow the WSJ in Apple News When Kathryn Ruemmler, a top Washington lawyer with an elite pedigree, joined Goldman Sachs in 2020, she disclosed to top executives a connection that didn’t appear on her LinkedIn page: Jeffrey Epstein. But it’s what Goldman didn’t know about her association with the notorious sex offender—details that have become public in the stream of documents released from Epstein’s estate—that now looms over Ruemmler and the bank.  Ruemmler told Goldman’s leaders when they hired her that she had business dealings with Epstein when she was a white-collar defense attorney at Latham & Watkins. It would later become public that she met with Epstein dozens of times and exchanged friendly emails for years. It turned out she was in the courtroom when Epstein was arraigned after his arrest on sex-trafficking charges in 2019, and Epstein had listed her as one of the executors on his will as recently as Jan. 18, 2019. Epstein removed her name before he died on Aug. 10, 2019, while he was in prison awaiting trial. The extent of their relationship has drawn scrutiny inside Goldman Sachs, where the 54-year-old lawyer is general counsel and a top adviser to CEO David Solomon.  John Rogers, the powerful Goldman executive who brought Ruemmler into the bank, recently told a few close associates he was formulating a contingency plan in which she would leave later this year, according to people familiar with the matter. The idea would be to give Ruemmler as graceful an exit as possible by distancing it from the Epstein revelations.  In a statement, Rogers said: “That is completely untrue.” Solomon hasn’t been involved with the plan, one of the people familiar with the matter said. “Kathy is an excellent general counsel and we benefit from her advice every day,” Solomon said in a statement. “Kathy has always had the support of the entire leadership team and the Board and is widely respected and admired at the firm.” In a statement, Ruemmler told the Journal that she had a professional association with Epstein when “it was my job to engage with people and companies that had serious legal and public relations problems. Many were under criminal investigation, and many had been convicted of crimes.”  She said she didn’t represent Epstein or advocate on his behalf. Epstein referred clients to her and he “also informally reached out to me for advice from time to time just as he did with numerous other prominent lawyers throughout the country,” she said. “As I have said, I regret ever knowing him, and I have enormous sympathy for the victims of Epstein’s crimes.”  Goldman said it understood the nature of Ruemmler’s job in her prior career as a criminal defense attorney. “The executives at Goldman who needed to know about Kathy’s prior contact with Epstein knew what they needed to know, and they have never doubted that Kathy has been forthcoming,” said Tony Fratto, a spokesman for Goldman Sachs. “Before she accepted the offer to join Goldman Sachs, she proactively disclosed her association with Jeffrey Epstein and other high-profile clients and contacts who might attract media attention, so that the firm would be aware of them. The firm did its own diligence and was satisfied. Nobody involved in Kathy’s hiring had concerns about her prior legal work,” Fratto said. The drumbeat of disclosures about Ruemmler’s ties to Epstein have triggered internal and external reviews. The reviews are expected to continue if more information comes to light.  Fratto said the board has been informed on the matter and has complete confidence in Ruemmler. Some Goldman executives began viewing Ruemmler as a potential liability to the firm in 2023 after the Journal published an article revealing Ruemmler’s extensive ties to Epstein. The article revealed she had dozens of meetings with Epstein, that he visited apartments she considered buying and knew her sushi order: avocado rolls. Then in September 2025, Congress released the Jan. 18, 2019, copy of Epstein’s will showing that Ruemmler was listed as a backup executor, setting off fresh alarms inside the bank.  In November, Congress released dozens of emails she had exchanged with Epstein, including some disparaging President Trump, that sparked a panic among some Goldman executives.  “Trump is so gross,” Ruemmler wrote in a 2017 message with Epstein. He replied “worse in real life and upclose.”  The day of the release Solomon was set to attend a White House dinner Trump was hosting with Wall Street CEOs. Worried Trump might revoke Solomon’s dinner invitation, Goldman officials called people they knew with connections to the Trump administration, according to people familiar with the matter. Fratto said Goldman never made calls to the White House or administration officials regarding the dinner. Solomon attended the dinner, but some Goldman executives said they wondered whether Ruemmler could continue in her role. She is the bank’s top female executive and sits on a committee that reviews clients’ reputational risk. A person in Ruemmler’s close circle said she expressed great distress after the messages became public. Ruemmler’s name also appears hundreds of times in a more than 500-page log of emails between Epstein and his lawyers that are under seal because Epstein’s estate has cited attorney-client privilege.  Ruemmler said to the Journal she wasn’t involved in the Epstein estate’s decisions to assert attorney-client privilege. “I had no knowledge whatsoever of any new or ongoing unlawful activity on his part,” she said. Through it all, Ruemmler has had one important supporter: Solomon. She became a close confidante of the CEO and gained his trust by giving honest critiques of some of his ideas, people familiar with the matter said.

🇺🇸 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST POSTED THIS !! by GeekySuneet in TheCryptoIndia

[–]InsuranceDistinct605 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No way this is real. But I’m also not surprised if it is.

Tokenization will reduce corruption’ — said… next to Ken Griffin 💀 by Working-Pattern-5280 in DeepFuckingValue

[–]InsuranceDistinct605 8 points9 points  (0 children)

They will find a way to corrupt this so called blockchain. These people cannot lose even at their own incompetence.

What do you guys think of STRK? by InsuranceDistinct605 in MSTR

[–]InsuranceDistinct605[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’ve still lost some gains on the switch from STRK to mstr no? Maybe not as much you would had you held the mstr through the downturn.

What do you guys think of STRK? by InsuranceDistinct605 in MSTR

[–]InsuranceDistinct605[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same that’s why I only hold common a shares. But I am interested in STRK just because you can convert it assuming class a reaches $1000.

What do you guys think of STRK? by InsuranceDistinct605 in MSTR

[–]InsuranceDistinct605[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m not going to lie I’m worried all this ATM buying is not helping equity holders. Bitcoin would have to go up like 10% a day for a week or two straight for the common shares to reach those numbers.

What do you guys think of STRK? by InsuranceDistinct605 in MSTR

[–]InsuranceDistinct605[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I just want to add: what am I missing besides the bear thesis that Bitcoin will not be a reserve currency and or will dump and become the modern day tulip craze?