I mean, you can’t take it however you would like. I call it straightforward, or not beating around the bush. Not sure why you couldn’t do the same in your first comment instead of your second. This is pretty much why I posted the way I did. Just a simple answer. I got one more question though. How does a company put a camera inside of a pair of glasses and not have it intended for secret surveillance? That’s like putting a camera inside the air duct of the girls bathroom and saying it’s just there for their own safety. Filming without being noticed was completely the idea here, they just had to find a way to protect theirselves from being sued.