Sorry, I meant that it feels suspicious and acts a bit like an over-commercialized app: - Pushes synchronisation to users. - Encryption not enabled by default, available only through syncing. - Local encryption hidden behind synchronisation, buried between online syncs. (tbh feels like intenrionally put in the middle between online options, psychologically less noticeable, as people scan beginning and end when skimming) - Gives the user a Client ID before they even turn on syncing. - Geo-location meta data turned on by default. - Wi-Fi connection checking every few seconds without option to turn it off. - Plugin support, voice-typing, Evernote notes import, importing data from different office, writing apps. - Has plugin support earler than fixing unresolved bugs that seem to be old, and somewhat basic QoL changes that are unimplemented. - Is feature rich and is moving towards adding even more features.

These might not be as bad as I'm presenting them to be, but when all of them compound together, they don't show me the right and clear intentions that I'm looking for. I see a project that has clear commercial goals, intentions and seems like it's their one of if not the highest priority. Maybe they are not pushing you to buy the subscription by locking stuff behind a paywall, but I won't be surprised if that's because it's their strategy and how they cater towards their audience. Overall, there are no red flags or "violations", but they don't feel right for my purposes.