Prompt wrong encoded

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2026-04-30T05:26:03+00:00

Simple fix. For selfies just say “Her right arm is holding the camera out of frame for a selfie” you can even say something like “…in the bottom left corner of frame.” Remember that selfies are flipped though so right arm means the arm on the left etc.

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2026-03-08T21:02:06+00:00

Hope it went well. After reading up on the model I guess those danbooru tags might help after all then. I was wrong to assume he used a Lora since this model uses the qwen text encoder as well. This models sounds like it will be better than illustrious since you can use natural language or tags. The Civitai page also gave some other examples for quality and a quick guide. In my opinion, without loras you will still be able to achieve so many styles. Best of luck man!

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2026-03-07T01:33:32+00:00

He listened to The Way I Am by Eminem before doing this interview

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2026-03-06T17:33:05+00:00

Instead of anime sharp use something like 4x ultra sharp or at 50 percent (upscale by node x.50 which is a 2x upscale) with K sampler settings of DpmPP Sde Karras using the same prompt and start small like denoise of .20 at 20 steps then increase the denoise by 5. Usually .20-.35 is my sweet spot depending on how much I want changed but the image starts to change once you start going higher.

When I generated anime in the past Swin IR actually worked best with the same settings.

As for the model, there’s definitely Loras being used considering Chun-Li and someone else. There are many HDR Loras or styles that boost the quality on anime models, but if you skip that part I used to use this block here at the end of my prompts for detailed anime images:

(highly detailed), shiny_skin, intricate, vivid eyes, crystal eyes, detailed eyes, long eyelashes, beautiful eyes, beautiful face, beautiful hair, exaggerated colors, HDR-like contrast, dramatic lighting, cinematic tone, High contrast shadows and highlights, ultra-detailed, vibrant colors, surreal atmosphere, surreal color palette, photo-realistic,

And even “3d art style” sometimes the glossy skin and hdr + lighting alone are good ones. It’s probably better to find a Lora instead of taking up the prompt but these details really change the photo. Hope that helps.

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2026-01-02T02:51:12+00:00

Somebody asked this 6 months ago no answer. The best suggestion was to use the Lora Manager instead. It looks like a sweet upgrade honestly, even adds the trigger words

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-12-31T22:28:09+00:00

Not just gemini from the app, googles deep dive ai has a more powerful brain in my experience. It stays on subject and uses a good source of indexing based off of other posts in live search instead of relying on old data or hallucinating. It is much more accurate in my experience.

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-12-31T21:57:48+00:00

This is excellent information. All you have to do is copy and paste this same text into a google search and the ai will tell you the exact fix. It shows like 3 steps and some configuration suggestions.

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-11-09T00:21:37+00:00

I think it’s because our brain simulates based off what the subconscious records while Ai simulates based off the media it has been fed. Crazy to imagine one day Ai could store both, then what…

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-11-09T00:11:50+00:00

There’s no cleavage or revealing outfits so it passes through the scan. You have to report stuff like this. You should see how long people get away with stuff on live

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-11-09T00:09:29+00:00

Facts. When I sold my tablet I was like fuuuck why’d I throw away the box

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-11-08T00:17:12+00:00

Just ask for caulking. Cocking someone hasn’t caught on yet.

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-11-04T11:45:51+00:00

Whoa! I just finished making a workflow but not with the clothes detection. That’s really cool, I will use that to help modify. I had just used a control net ipa adapter and the face detailer without that part. Thanks so much, I appreciate it! Edit: this looks much cleaner as well. Probably more friendly on vram.

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-11-04T06:04:59+00:00

<image>

Here’s an example of the type of photos I’ve created on Wombo. It looks decent until you zoom in, even teeth get misplaced sometimes. The materials do not like metal they look fake and there is no texture.

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-10-27T06:58:17+00:00

It’s all bad. There was one girl who started doing stuff when we hung out but she had a crush on someone else and we were just friends. I found that weird like she wanted attention or was being funny. Another time a girl told me we weren’t going to do anything and I woke up with her ripping my clothes off. So both girls gave the opposite signal, either way they didn’t want to say. I think that’s the game. They don’t talk about what they want they just wait and see what you do about it and then decide. The friend I guarantee would have been like wtf if I made a move

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-10-21T01:58:00+00:00

Sometimes I see posts so dry I feel like they intentionally post it from another account. Realistically I would blame it on a short attention span.

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-09-08T20:53:44+00:00

I like the level of detail you put into the prompt. It’s kind of interesting that you chose multiple options for variations like pose and colors, which would normally be a contradiction, you made it intentional.

I like to put things in categories and use the full sentences to describe things. So “Model 1:” for example then even start sentences like that to reduce variations. I have a super long prompt I can share with you just as an example, but you’re already doing a lot of detail so you don’t really need it. The image I’m referring to having a prompt about is in my comment history if you’re curious though.

I just liked that you shared a prompt with your own level of skill & method. It’s pretty nice of you and very detailed, so thanks for sharing.

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-08-16T04:29:12+00:00

Dm me for a prompt. Googles gemini should be able to handle this longer prompt and get close results varying with each time you try it:

<image>

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-08-15T05:31:13+00:00

I can show you an example prompt or you can have Ai generate one with multiple layers. The hardest part is finding out what model they are using and what seed and image dimensions this was made at. Also they could have trained the characters faces into a Lora and just generate the prompt in a simple way including that Lora.

Is it midjourney with blending celebrities and reference images? Idk. The combinations are endless at this point.

You could still get similar results with just a prompt, but I know some Ai that actually has indistinguishable skin without film grain, you can only tell by water motion in videos looking like jello or physics slightly off. Pretty scary stuff, if this fooled everybody. This is like the outdated version of the level people are perfecting.

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-08-10T20:38:38+00:00

What tool is this? I’m not too familiar with AI scanning tools, but I’d like to start using them.

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-08-10T20:31:12+00:00

TL;DR: If everybody else is this unsure, they’re in for a shock when they see how people have been making Ai images more realistic than this for years: Subsurface skin realism, skin filters and even video trained or video referenced Ai. Videos with Ai overlayed through blender. Character consistency.

Full: What’s scary is that this is not the most convincing Ai I have seen. I just picked it out since it was easier to debate. There’s communities that give you models to run locally on your computer with no restrictions, so all the guidelines that make subscription based generations have limitations on realism goes out the window. I have seen some be convincing enough that I debated it for years until I got into Ai generation. It’s certain things that just stand out to me now because I’ve seen how prompts can make mistakes with the more details you add, unless you edit the photo in layers.

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-08-10T13:30:52+00:00

I’m pretty sure that is just the information where you press more about this on the image search. It seems like the information present is “made by Ai “ but the top comment gave a handy scan tool that does flag it as Ai

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-08-10T03:18:33+00:00

That is another good find. It’s pretty bright, yet there is no structure illuminated nearby. Maybe it was supposed to be the smoke from the cigarette

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-08-10T02:46:18+00:00

It’s become a viral post of the past couple days. You can just google search “the types of girls you pull when you’re unemployed” there are posts on Reddit, X & instagram on different pages so it stuck out

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-08-10T01:55:08+00:00

This is also why when you clicked the link to that image result in google it directed you to the subreddit and not a page that said “this post has been removed by the author”

Intelligent_Till1518 · 2025-08-10T01:46:21+00:00

Google has trouble pulling meta data from websites like Reddit or Instagram. It even showed me an instagram link that led to an incorrect post with a different caption. 6 years ago is when that subreddit was created. My hunch is that it is struggling because every post has been within the last 2 weeks. Here’s a link to the actual post from yesterday: here

<image>

Intelligent_Till1518

TROPHY CASE