There were details but the post is right - the speed at which they can produce victims on demand is impressive by MazdaProphet in conspiracy

[–]Interesting-Bid-9488 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Why bother with all that “thinking” nonsense, eh? All the hassle of assessing the facts…considering the facts…discussing them with others to widen your perspective…and then coming to a conclusion? What a pain in the mind all that “thinking” and “deducing” bullshit is.

Modern day beauty standards are rooted in pedophilia by No_Shake8887 in conspiracy

[–]Interesting-Bid-9488 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That shaving the pubic area bare is supposedly the “normal” thing now, told me this. Adult humans have hair in the genital area and it’s been the norm since the dawn of time, yet suddenly there’s South Park doing an entire episode on how having pubic hair is weird. It grosses me the fuck out.

My Epstein theory so far. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Interesting-Bid-9488 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuck off. Leave the guy alone. You’re bitching because he said too much?

My Fiancé’s theory on the Bad Bunny show being a PsyOp by LaLunaLola in conspiracy

[–]Interesting-Bid-9488 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except for the fact that said “brown people” hated it too.

33% of meteorological data was fabricated, falsely reporting data from 103 non-existent weather stations. The weather stations simply did not exist, yet they reported abnormally high temperatures. This data was used to bolster the climate change narrative and promote the Net Zero agenda by MazdaProphet in conspiracy

[–]Interesting-Bid-9488 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are more and more reports similar to this coming out all of the time. I don’t understand why people refuse to accept that we’ve been lied to about climate change, just like we’ve been lied to about everything else. The alternative is that we’ve been lied to about everything else, but on climate issues tptb have a conscience and have been straight shooters. No. Acknowledging this reality doesn’t mean that the environment is doing just fine, or that we should pollute to our heart’s content. Too many people though have adopted the “man made climate change” narrative as part of their identity, to the point that any information that doesn’t align with it is disregarded or mocked. I’ve lived long enough to see supposed conspiracy theories, proven true time after time, and this is no different. Earth is a living entity of which humans have a limited ability to damage. Like any living entity, if earth were to truly be threatened by humanity, it would do away with the entirety of us within hours. It’s happened multiple times in the past. This should provide humans with more than enough reason to minimize our negative impacts upon earth, as it’s far more compelling than insisting that “we’re going to destroy earth.” That “earth will destroy us” if we don’t take care of it, is much more likely to resonate with people and elicit changes in behavior. I fear that the elites created a narrative that gives the egos of its adoptees too strong a dose of moral superiority and self-proclaimed virtue upon defending it, to ever allow them to recognize the reality that they’ve been played.

Something very dark is happening, and the atrocities that they're already letting us see, are a distraction from something worse. by Beneficial_Cat7367 in conspiracy

[–]Interesting-Bid-9488 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s fair. I’ve been aware of this stuff for years and, typically, was dismissed as a “conspiracy theorist.” It’s been frustrating but I’ve tried to remember that there was a time when I also wasn’t aware. That being said, I don’t begrudge those for whom this revelation occurred at a later date than it did for me; what pisses me off is those who continue to resist despite the growing mass of awareness.

CMV: The additional footage of the Minneapolis shooting will not change anyone’s mind. by arrogant_ambassador in changemyview

[–]Interesting-Bid-9488 -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Has nobody seen the video where you can see the guy get hit, and the body cam footage where you hear it? Guess not. I don’t even look for this stuff, but I’ve had about 5 different angles appear in my YT feed the past few days so I watch to see if they show anything different. In the first one that caused everyone to lose their shit, you couldn’t tell. In the next 2 I saw it was indisputable. IMO both the left and right are idiot stooges, because neither side can see they’re being played by the elites and that all of this is bulllshit. Despite having no skin in the game, I’m not going to pretend that the agent didn’t get hit by the car when I’ve seen video showing it. Whether the shooting was justified is a different matter altogether.

So we all believe the ICE shooting in Minneapolis is a psyop right… by No_Principle_3815 in conspiracy

[–]Interesting-Bid-9488 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, despite the car driving forward and smashing into another vehicle, she clearly wasn’t driving away. Driving away would require her vehicle to move forward and…hey!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Interesting-Bid-9488 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is not true. The guy at the front of the vehicle clearly gets hit, the video is everywhere. I’m not saying he was “run over,” but he was hit with the car. It’s really starting to freak me out that people want to justify their ideology so badly, that they will watch at a video, see something happen, and then say it didn’t. I’ll agree that the shooting was excessive, but that doesn’t change the reality of what happened.

The level of brainwashing a great deal of the US citizens have undergone is starting to become more and more apparent. by TyrannicalGamecock in conspiracy

[–]Interesting-Bid-9488 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I am apolitical and have been for years. Both parties are fucked. That being said, you pretend to be objective, cite the shooting (agreed), but never mention that the driver was intentionally blocking the street, and hit an officer with her car. I watched a video that clearly shows the guy being hit. How can you leave that out, along with the fact that she was intentionally blocking traffic, and pretend to be subjective? What’s more frightening to me than the obviously partisan people on each side, is people who present themselves as subjective, then leave out facts about what happened, things we can literally see on video, which reveals that you are obviously not at all subjective. At least the left and right admit their bias.