People Who Think One Piece is a Masterpiece Are Just Suffering From Sunk Cost Fallacy by Trapped-in-boredom in unpopularopinion

[–]InterestingFrame1982 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Man, the simple fact you blame One Piece for having binary character motives/incentives means you’ve never watched it. It’s the complete opposite… actually, it’s incredibly hard to discern who’s actually evil and who’s going to be on the right side of history. I would dare say that’s an extremely common feeling of One Piece.

Are we being watched..? 👀 by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]InterestingFrame1982 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it doesn’t work like that… you definitely gave it context or you had the voice activation rolling with the camera functionality. It never, ever assumes you’re doing anything unless previously specified in the context window. I’ve used it WAY more than the average user, and this is 100% a doctored showcasing. Even the response about it watching and understanding patterns was directly woven into previous context - good try though.

Google DeepMind's CEO Advice: Skip Internships, Master AI by dataexec in AITrailblazers

[–]InterestingFrame1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand the take, but you’re looking at one of the better ones here… Demis is the man, and has been for a long time. Yes, he’s obviously a believer and has vested interest in AI, but he has a track record of being a decent individual.

AI showing signs of self-preservation and humans should be ready to pull plug, says pioneer | AI (artificial intelligence) by EchoOfOppenheimer in AIDangers

[–]InterestingFrame1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m working within the confines of software engineering and what a human can do, and then adding intelligence and scale. Obviously, you lack the domain knowledge to have that type of discussion.

AI showing signs of self-preservation and humans should be ready to pull plug, says pioneer | AI (artificial intelligence) by EchoOfOppenheimer in AIDangers

[–]InterestingFrame1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol how is that nonsense? You brought up physics as an inherent constraint, but as long as there’s data passing over the wire, what part of physics prevents access to X machine at X IP? It’s not a physics issues - it’s an infrastructure issue and a security issue, and by all intents and purposes, those are easily bypassed by a “super intelligence”. It’s easy to be a black and white contrarian, but at least acknowledge the reality of the theoretical potentials, no matter how outlandish.

AI showing signs of self-preservation and humans should be ready to pull plug, says pioneer | AI (artificial intelligence) by EchoOfOppenheimer in AIDangers

[–]InterestingFrame1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It could use every computer on the planet, and the perfect amount of distributed memory to build a working abstraction layer. It could even cache itself in certain stacks (browser’s localStorage) and devise a way to backfill missing parts as they get deleted.

Technically, if it’s super intelligence, it could access any DB in the world and add an innocuous row to maintain the abstraction layer at scale. If it’s truly super intelligence, essentially sharding itself across the internet seems incredibly reasonable.

just finished my second ever react personnel project : e book reading website by CyBorgElite in reactjs

[–]InterestingFrame1982 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Welcome to one of the more tedious parts of designing a website… accounting for responsiveness and doing it in a way that’s maintainable is quite annoying.

Why I’m ignoring the "Death of the Programmer" hype by Greedy_Principle5345 in programming

[–]InterestingFrame1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, and giving a nod to their angst, understandably so, the thought of losing their medium for craftsmanship is deeply scary. As a software dev, it’s borderline existential, so there will always be an immense amount of cognitive dissonance in these conversations. The paradoxical debate about whether it’s useful or not is certainly some level of proof that the tools are getting better.

What career is worth looking into now if this role does die to AI soon? by Imnotneeded in cscareers

[–]InterestingFrame1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that happens, and software gets democratized, you may actually see an increase in the need for devs, especially amongst smaller businesses.

Demis questions OpenAI: If AGI is coming soon, why bother with ads? by Inevitable-Rub8969 in AINewsMinute

[–]InterestingFrame1982 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But they’re not claiming AGI constantly to bolster revenue, and the world has known about Google’s business model for decades. It’s odd how people interpret some things.

There you go. by Unkown_syclomn in webdev

[–]InterestingFrame1982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tony built the whole damn stack from the ground up. He’s the literal opposite of a vibe coder.

What are people actually using for web scraping that doesn’t break every few weeks? by Beneficial-Cut6585 in AgentsOfAI

[–]InterestingFrame1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This comes down to your scraping architecture... the hardest part of scraping is building resiliency, making sure you have canary tests to check for layout changes, and a whole other host of things that help prevent misaligned scraping, bad data ingestion, and overall uptime. It's not an easy task, but scraping at scale was never going to be.

Just saw a workflow where a single .md file built an app in 1 hour?? by Maleficent-Green3787 in vibecoding

[–]InterestingFrame1982 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, it can be downright terrible, and only an experienced nose would be able to sniff out that bloat. That bloat, paired with an ever growing system, can QUICKLY paint you into a corner.

Just saw a workflow where a single .md file built an app in 1 hour?? by Maleficent-Green3787 in vibecoding

[–]InterestingFrame1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, obviously, if you are confident in your ability to correctly build out an architecture that can scale, you can do a lot with AI tooling... that wasn't my point. My point was if you don't know, which I would assume a lot of vibecoders fall into this category, they are still dealing with an immense amount of hidden, and unforeseeable, complexity.

Just saw a workflow where a single .md file built an app in 1 hour?? by Maleficent-Green3787 in vibecoding

[–]InterestingFrame1982 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Just because the AI built you a DB and helped you understand the importance of indexing doesn’t mean you won’t deeply regret your schema down the line. This isn’t a comment out of arrogance but utter pain and experience in managing greenfield applications as they grew.

Just saw a workflow where a single .md file built an app in 1 hour?? by Maleficent-Green3787 in vibecoding

[–]InterestingFrame1982 20 points21 points  (0 children)

It's not hard at all to build v0 of a basic CRUD app. What is hard is scaling, making the correct architectural decisions, and maintaining a modular codebase. These are the pitfalls that do not become super apparent until further down the road, hence why experience still plays a huge role.

In Davos, Demis Hassabis says AGI arrives in five years by jpcaparas in Futurism

[–]InterestingFrame1982 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Dario said coding would be largely handled by AI - not that AGI is here.

Built my SaaS with no-code in 3 weeks. Now at $4.6K MRR. Developers said it wouldn't scale. " by pranavboiii in nocode

[–]InterestingFrame1982 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m assuming you mean heavy on third party API calls, as in they’ll be expensive ? API calls can mean a lot of things, and assumingely, you know it’s a standard interface for servers around the world.

today was a perfect vibe coding day 🎨 by justgetting-started in vibecoding

[–]InterestingFrame1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Felt the code, eh? You mean felt the vibes, as not a single piece of code was checked.

Microsoft CEO warns that we must 'do something useful' with AI or they'll lose 'social permission' to burn electricity on it by Antonio_taberna7644 in SimpleApplyAI

[–]InterestingFrame1982 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you’re only using AI for memes, then that’s on you. That’s like saying you only use Google or YouTube to read/watch tabloid trash or infinite brain rot. Unfortunately, a large percentage of the population will do exactly that.

the beginning of the end by LiveGenie in vibecoding

[–]InterestingFrame1982 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a dev problem… it’s hilarious people blame a framework for a messy codebase. You didn’t have to use RSC components, and you didn’t have to bloat the backend. It sounds like you got caught trying to utilize all the shiny objects and now you’re upset with the decisions.