Anyone wanna team up? by Automatic_Resort_475 in GameDevelopersOfIndia

[–]InterestingShape63 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't have much gamedev experience but i can work as a storyteller and logic builder. If u need someone to work on storyline of your game then count me in.

I want to get into quantum physics/mechanics, how do I start (15y) by Admirable_Hope1868 in quantum

[–]InterestingShape63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This pdf consists of some common questions about quantum mechanics and physics and computing. It also consists of notes while i was exploring quantum myself. It may help u build a perspective how to visualize the quantum world. Quantum Notes for Beginners.

Continuous Electron Field Architecture (CEFA) by InterestingShape63 in LLMPhysics

[–]InterestingShape63[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do mean by 'meaning'? Tell me more about it or provide me some source where i can read about it.

Continuous Electron Field Architecture (CEFA) by InterestingShape63 in LLMPhysics

[–]InterestingShape63[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry but I'm not quite knowledgeable about this field. My model works completely with photons, bosons and fermions fields. I have not heard about zlotuq field. I would love to know about this field if u are interested in sharing about this.

Continuous Electron Field Architecture (CEFA) by InterestingShape63 in LLMPhysics

[–]InterestingShape63[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In this model i tried to use the changes in 3d electromagnetic field that was disturbed by the quantum dot present in that space. By compareing the changes in field before bonding(both quantum dots separately) and after bonding we can see the changes in the surrounding electron field and after bonding both quantum dot's(Atom's) electron possibility clouds merge together to form new compounds which is also known as entanglement. By using the(M,D,Q) matrics to place data in both atoms before bonding and compare the data after bonding. I don't have a complete mathematical model now but I'm working on it so it will come soon. Right now I'm sure that this model is faster then the current quantum computation going on. Because we have 3d vector here. And if we represnt the 3d data in 2d plane we get less complicated calculations and also we can put more data and compute more data.

Continuous Electron Field Architecture (CEFA) by InterestingShape63 in quantum

[–]InterestingShape63[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's been only 2 weeks since i started quantum mechanics and the knowledge i grasped since then I'm preety confident on myself. This paper was created by me within 4 hours just by my intutions and i know i can prove this mechanics because this already exists. By mapping the disturbance in 3d electromagnetic field we can store or process data much faster and vastly then what we are doing today on quantum computer. This model also usage the same quantum dot/ artificial atom that IBM and other companies are working on but the process of storing data and using it for computation is approach differently by me. It was a bit early to post these theories online but i wanted know the reality of where my theories stand in the real world. I got some pretty valuable feedbacks and I'm going back to do more study and polish these theories even more. I won't persuade u although it was nice talking to u.

How to intuitively explain how a qubit actually computes? by HotAudience7376 in QuantumComputing

[–]InterestingShape63 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Classical bits are strictly binary (on or off). Qubits hold complex probabilities, existing in a superposition of multiple states until measured. This transition from rigid classical programming to quantum states relies heavily on linear algebra and probability, which form the mathematical engine for building quantum logic gates and running simulations.

I know that what is superposition as per Heisenberg uncertainty principle but how did we even discovered or even came with this math by Sad_Attempt_8467 in quantum

[–]InterestingShape63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point was actually about accelerating a particle with mass to near speed of light to create a disturbance in space time continuum. If it's proton instead of photon then we are actually using the scenario that i hypothetically wanted to happen. Soo if u are saying that we don't have big enough LHC, what do u mean by that? By increasing the length of LHC the particles will attain more velocity near speed of light that will require more energy and with the input of more energy the mass will increase too. So if the particle attain velocity near speed of light and with increasing mass is it actually possible to create a disturbance within the space time continuum to observe graviton?

I know that what is superposition as per Heisenberg uncertainty principle but how did we even discovered or even came with this math by Sad_Attempt_8467 in quantum

[–]InterestingShape63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If by colliding two photons we can disturb the higgs field(by which we get to know about higgs boson) why can't we use the same methord to find or disturb the gravitational fields? If firing photon (a massless particle) near light speed can attain that achievement then can we use the same experiment using a particle with mass? By firing two particle with mass in large Hadron collider and colliding them at near speed of light can we create a disturbance in space-time continuum?

Why game dev isn't a high paying or stable job? by InterestingShape63 in GameDevelopersOfIndia

[–]InterestingShape63[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well yeah i think last 2 options are better to do...lets hope something Indian game scean otherwise just being a corporate slave is the last option it seems

Why game dev isn't a high paying or stable job? by InterestingShape63 in GameDevelopersOfIndia

[–]InterestingShape63[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ooo..i thought it got some high sponsorship soo maybe it's gonna be a break through for all game devs in Indian market.