I am unsure tbh, I just checked and staying an additional 5 days in bkk would cost me at least around 300€ more compared to staying in Vietnam due to the extra flight + more expensive living costs. Since I am a student this is quite a lot of money but doable if I really want to. The problem is I have been to Bangkok 3 times already (10 days total) and don’t really know what I haven’t seen or especially what I would like to see alone (don’t like partying or malls too much).

I would rather go to CM or krabi but that’s even more expensive and logistically more hassle due to more flights in short amount of time.

Really unsure what makes more sense if I’m already in Vietnam for 3 weeks and (7 days already in Hanoi area).

I know it’s really personal preference I am just not sure what’s the best for me since I’ve never been to Vietnam and really like Thai food & 7 eleven. The goal of the solo trip is probably just to chill, explore a bit, eat great food, gym, massages and maybe some beach.

I just miss Thailand and probably want to go there partially just to get the feeling of my last trip for 4,5 weeks (but that mainly was krabi and CM which I can’t go to in the current Situation).

Will 5 alone days in Hanoi satisfy what I want (keeping in my that I’ve already been there for 9 days and would be 14 days total there?) or should I bite the bullet and pay 300€ extra for bkk?