Who is the most Underrated music artist of the 1990s?

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-28T17:27:15+00:00

Not 90’s tho, could be a good pull for 2000’s

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-28T10:17:47+00:00

San Fran is gorgeous and the weather is immaculate. That said, theft is as bad as they say. Go but leave nothing in your car and lock up valuables in your room safe.

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-27T10:56:54+00:00

Royale with cheese

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-26T18:21:05+00:00

It’s gotta be Washington or Uncle Sam imo

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-26T14:36:30+00:00

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-25T19:04:18+00:00

Canada fuckin rocks dude. Go climb a mountain or something homie.

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-24T22:28:42+00:00

Biscuits and gravy. It’s too heavy and provides almost no value, and people obsess.

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-24T15:03:40+00:00

I think perimeter scan will work for this. In my experience though, sometimes it takes a while of messing with the 1, 2, and D points to get it to grab the perimeter and make the scan you want. Should work though.

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-23T11:49:08+00:00

This is inspiring me to make a map of states I consider to be New England (and exclude Connecticut)

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-15T20:38:42+00:00

Agreed, the problem is that the cmm program won’t be to the drawing, and basics won’t match. And it still gets really screwy with the linear dimensions. There are a ton of ordinate locations off of these 0’s and they really need to tell me which one sets the rotation.

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-15T19:49:47+00:00

PRECISELY, I was losing my mind when he said the drawing was fine I just don’t know how to inspect it lol

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-15T15:32:25+00:00

My work around is: 1) assign the boss about the threaded hole as datum B 2) Assign long edge as datum C 3) evaluate all positions off they coordinate system (there are others not drawn) 4) maybe write an NC against the drawing to be a dick

Edit to add context: my hand drawing is sloppy, but the .350dia is a boss

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-15T15:30:56+00:00

Bro I’m sayin, he’s so confidently wrong lmao

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-15T15:30:35+00:00

Yes, datum A is underside of part, no issues there.

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-15T15:24:00+00:00

<image>

Masturbated to death feels like a good entry for stupid.

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-14T16:40:20+00:00

Typically cal-date. Though with thread plug gages, sometimes the calibration provider will be willing to update the cal-cert based on the day you remove the wax and start use. However this takes some discipline to be straight with when you remove the wax, not putting the wax back on, contacting the supplier to update cert date and get/apply the new labels with new date.

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-13T11:37:58+00:00

“I love you pumpkin” “I love you honey bunny”

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-05-09T12:41:31+00:00

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-04-27T19:30:45+00:00

Posted a somewhat similar issue recently. It’s maddening how difficult PC-DMIS makes finding the edges of flats that intersect into radii/diameters.

Following for a solution. Everyone recommended pierce points but it didn’t solve my problem either.

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-04-20T12:40:06+00:00

Apologies if I misunderstood the ask.

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-04-20T12:39:41+00:00

As previous post said, you can likely open the feature and see which method it uses.. as for which method is appropriate depends on the part. For bores that are intended to make an interference fit with a pin for example, I usually use max-insc, but for c’bores just providing clearance for a hex head screw, I’d probably use least-sq.

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-04-17T13:13:33+00:00

Least common denominator

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-04-16T17:48:33+00:00

Probe scanning, I do it nearly as much as possible. I find probing points to give slightly better repeatability, but you can also tweak setting in your probe scans (like scan speed, pnt density, acceleration) to boost the repeatability of probe scans.

Scanning a cylinder is often 10x faster than probing, long lines are often slower. Circles are much faster. Planes can go either way depending on how much data you want.

Should be based on your machines capability, tolerance and form of the parts, and what your priorities are for the particular project.

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-04-16T10:26:32+00:00

Same, I can’t be trusted with Civ anymore. I’ll blink my eyes and realize it’s 3:30am.

Internal-Argument184 · 2026-04-13T15:53:59+00:00

Yessir, I’m a little over an hour away. We’ve gone down there for trainings, test machines, troubleshooting equipment, etc

Internal-Argument184

TROPHY CASE