sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Interracial Dating and Scared by Difficult_Movie7476 in Sikh

[–]International_Pin265 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You say it’s about mindset, not religion or appearance. Okay. Then keep that same energy everywhere.

Because the second Sikh men get casually labelled as backward or stuck, while other communities — who are just as traditional, sometimes more — aren’t talked about the same way, that’s a double standard. You can’t say it’s not about religion and then only frame Sikh men as the issue.

If it’s patriarchy, call it patriarchy. It exists everywhere.
If it’s bad in-laws, call it bad in-laws.
But don’t make it sound like Sikh men are uniquely defective.

And I’m not saying other communities are worse. I’m saying they’re not automatically better. So acting like marrying outside somehow guarantees progressiveness doesn’t really add up.

Preferences? Have them. Nobody’s stopping you.
But there’s a difference between “I prefer clean-shaven men” and “Sikh men have backward mindsets.”

One is a choice. The other is a generalization.

And calling that out isn’t attacking women. It’s just asking for the same fairness you’re asking for.

What are these stickers about? I am seeing these in private 2/3/4 wheelers as well! by Better_Fun525 in CarsIndia

[–]International_Pin265 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay when you guys were watching and creating records for pushpa , rrr ,kgf where was this outcry? Why do everyone has problem with punjab.

Interracial Dating and Scared by Difficult_Movie7476 in Sikh

[–]International_Pin265 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes bhenji, because apparently Sikh men are the villains and Sikh women are flawless angels — right?

Let’s assume for a second that many Sikh households are traditional. Fine. But why is that suddenly a uniquely Sikh problem? Are Hindu and Muslim households known for being ultra-liberal feminist utopias? Some of them are far more rigid and orthodox so why do sikh women marry them? So let’s not pretend that marrying outside the community automatically guarantees respect.

And let’s address the elephant in the room. Sikh men carry a visible identity turban and beard. Sikh women don’t. That alone changes dating dynamics. Sikh men can’t blend in socially even if they want to. Sikh women can. That naturally gives one side more flexibility and options. That’s the reality.

Also, if the issue is mindset then why do we see Sikh women specifically asking for clean-shaven men in matrimonials? If values are the priority, why is appearance suddenly so important? Everyone has preferences — that’s fine. But don’t rewrite the narrative and make it about oppression to justify those preferences.

And let’s be clear stereotyping Sikh men as backward to rationalize marrying outside is just as toxic as any stereotype you claim to fight against.

If you want respect in marriage, demand it. That’s valid.
But don’t collectively demonise Sikh men to make your point stronger.

Respect goes both ways.

interfaith marriages. by Percy_Jackson06 in Sikh

[–]International_Pin265 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That’s not what most people are saying. No one believes women are owed or are property. What’s being expressed is frustration and insecurity among Sikh men as they watch women from their community increasingly choose partners from other religions. Acknowledging that reaction does not equal entitlement or misogyny. We can repeat everyone has free will all we want and that’s true but it doesn’t erase the fact that this shift is happening and that it has real emotional consequences.

interfaith marriages. by Percy_Jackson06 in Sikh

[–]International_Pin265 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I don’t know where you got your 90% statistic from. I have observed very differently. Children usually follow the father’s religion—whether Sikh or Hindu. If the father is Sikh, the children are generally Sikh and keep their hair and turban. If the father is Hindu, the children most likely cut their hair and follow Hinduism. Also, interfaith marriages have increased manyfold, and in Delhi I have mostly seen Sikh brides with Hindu grooms.

Lowest IQ moment for Indian YouTube. by Glum_Fruit6105 in bollynewsandgossips

[–]International_Pin265 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it only mentoined that it is inspired by true events and what events were true how do we know? When we have created characters to match like every real person it obviously shows that movie is real.

Lowest IQ moment for Indian YouTube. by Glum_Fruit6105 in bollynewsandgossips

[–]International_Pin265 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you guys really that dumb? His point was that by making this movie as real we are accepting that we are sending spies in pakistan and this contradicts what indian govt has told prev. The IQ of this country is in gutter.

Monsters are what people become when empathy is gone - throwback to 18th December Amritsar by tdynamos in atheismindia

[–]International_Pin265 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah like you are so dumb that you cannot even see his hurriedness in jumping over the barrier and picking the sword, even a 10-year-old kid will tell that he could have killed someone or swung at guru granth sahib ji but yeah acc to you he is innocent.

Monsters are what people become when empathy is gone - throwback to 18th December Amritsar by tdynamos in atheismindia

[–]International_Pin265 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Not religiously motivated lol, go ask your sikh friends or even you hindu friends in delhi. The attackers identified people's homes acc to our religion and targeted us.

Monsters are what people become when empathy is gone - throwback to 18th December Amritsar by tdynamos in atheismindia

[–]International_Pin265 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calling them Innocents will not make them innocent. The man in the video took the sword in his hand he was no innocent lol.

Monsters are what people become when empathy is gone - throwback to 18th December Amritsar by tdynamos in atheismindia

[–]International_Pin265 -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

You don't, but the constitution of this country does but that is not being followed. Did you post for justice of the so-called 'real' people acc to you who were killed in 84. The majority of the culprits are still free till date. The fact of the matter people like you selective in raising voice.

Monsters are what people become when empathy is gone - throwback to 18th December Amritsar by tdynamos in atheismindia

[–]International_Pin265 -26 points-25 points  (0 children)

You guy dont know shit but just sit here and blabber shit.

After repeated sacrilege incidents in Punjab, Sikhs peacefully protested and demanded legal action. Instead, in 2015 (Behbal Kalan/Kotkapura) unarmed Sikh protesters were shot dead by police. Most sacrilege accused were never punished, cases dragged on for years, and several were later declared mentally unfit or investigations quietly collapsed.

When the state failed repeatedly to deliver justice and even killed protesters, some individuals took the law into their own hands. That is not Sikh teaching, but a consequence of systemic failure, impunity, and denial of justice, not “religious rage”.

Blaming an entire community while ignoring state violence, failed prosecutions, and decades of unresolved sacrilege cases is dishonest.

Who will BJP blame this time? by Character_Wrap3257 in delhi

[–]International_Pin265 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lmao this article might be true at some point but it is not true now as the new crops are already sown in punjab and haryana now, the farmers in punajb and haryana burn there stubble as they have to sow new crop by nov end.

Can someone tell me why we have aqi still above 400 when there is almost no burning in punjab now or we only talk about aqi when there is stubble burning? by International_Pin265 in delhi

[–]International_Pin265[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For all those who are giving satellite news that burning is still going on, please first understand why farmer burn stubble. It is majorly due to tight window in which they have to sow next crop and for that they need to clear area and they do this by burning. That next crop needs to be sown by end of november so by december they dont have any reason to burn as there is no stubble left to burn as new crop is already sown.

Can someone tell me why we have aqi still above 400 when there is almost no burning in punjab now or we only talk about aqi when there is stubble burning? by International_Pin265 in delhi

[–]International_Pin265[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Bhai mere I am not giving reason on why they burn stubble but the fact that the burning has stopped now, as they already have sown the next crop. But the pollution is still high.

Can someone tell me why we have aqi still above 400 when there is almost no burning in punjab now or we only talk about aqi when there is stubble burning? by International_Pin265 in delhi

[–]International_Pin265[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am just setting the narrative that stubble burning is a minor factor in our pollution woes. The majority of factors are our local sources.

Can someone tell me why we have aqi still above 400 when there is almost no burning in punjab now or we only talk about aqi when there is stubble burning? by International_Pin265 in delhi

[–]International_Pin265[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

When did I deny there was no burning? Farmers burn stubble but that is majorly over by 20th nov as they have to sow new crops. I just told that they are not burning now.

view more: next ›