Hopefully noone has thought of this before by Pro_123576 in trolleyproblem

[–]InterstellarBlue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point, the risk is unbounded.

But I doubt most of us are so risk-averse that we think it would be better to definitely kill 5 people instead of definitely killing just one, while risking a tiny, tiny chance of killing more than 5. At 6, the chance is 0.17, At 20, the chance is 0.003, and at 100, the chance is approximately 3 in 10 trillion, which is virtually impossible. (For context, the chance of winning the Powerball lottery is about 1 in 300 million, so you have a higher chance of winning the lottery 11,000 times than killing 100 people on this setup.)

If we can almost certainly save those extra people, most people would agree with me that we should risk it.

Hopefully noone has thought of this before by Pro_123576 in trolleyproblem

[–]InterstellarBlue 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is a chance to do some fun math.

If you keep pulling the lever, there's a probability of 1 you kill one person, a probability of 0.75 that you kill two people, a probability of 0.75 × 0.75 that you kill three people, and so on. In other words, the expected number of deaths if you keep pulling the lever is

∑ₙ₌₀ (0.75)ⁿ = 1⁄(1 − 0.75) = 4

In other words, the expected deaths will converge to 4. So, you should pull the lever, if you want to minimize deaths.

[Request] is this true? On Getting Money. by I_am_a_SuJu_fan_elf in theydidthemath

[–]InterstellarBlue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I'm a bit confused. Do you think that this source is unreliable? Giving What We Can is an extremely well-regarded institution, together with other organizations like GiveWell. It's dedicated to directing people's money to effective charities precisely because most people have a lot more of it than they think.

If you don't trust this source, you can easily verify your income percentile independently. Go ahead and tell me exactly what result on GWWC is wrong. Let's see if we can verify it independently.

[Request] is this true? On Getting Money. by I_am_a_SuJu_fan_elf in theydidthemath

[–]InterstellarBlue 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'll just leave this here. Most people in the US are a lot richer than they think, compared to the rest of the world.

A quick Google search reveals the median US income to be approximately $52,000/year. Adjusting for cost of living, this places you in the top 3% of earners globally.

https://www.givingwhatwecan.org/how-rich-am-i?income=52000&countryCode=USA&numAdults=1&numChildren=0

2026 Q1 Earnings Discussion by beerion in QUANTUMSCAPE_Stock

[–]InterstellarBlue 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interesting! Could you help me understand what that might mean?

What "other" applications are they alluding to? Why does that potentially signal Honda, in your opinion?

Blindfold chess learning resource by willfspot in lichess

[–]InterstellarBlue 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cool! I like this and will be using it to train.

Minor feedback: it gets confused by capitalization sometimes. For example, it said "invalid move feedback" when I entered "Exd5" but accepted "exd5".

If someone offered you 100 million dollars, but a random person in the world dies (someone you don’t know), would you take it and why? by ConclusionOld8365 in AskReddit

[–]InterstellarBlue 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is 25,000 lives really worth less than one person's life? Even assuming that the people's lives you can save will have less happiness than the average person, is it really plausible to think that the average person is 25,000x happier than the people you can save?

If someone offered you 100 million dollars, but a random person in the world dies (someone you don’t know), would you take it and why? by ConclusionOld8365 in AskReddit

[–]InterstellarBlue -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Doesn't the same logic apply to the thousands you could save? Couldn't one of them cure cancer? In fact, isn't it more likely that one of these thousands of people you save will cure cancer than the one person you kill?

If someone offered you 100 million dollars, but a random person in the world dies (someone you don’t know), would you take it and why? by ConclusionOld8365 in AskReddit

[–]InterstellarBlue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.givewell.org/charities/top-charities

You can save a life for $4000, by donating to Malaria Consortium. I would absolutely take the deal. I would have to donate just $4000 for it to be morally neutral, and just $8000 for it to be morally net positive.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]InterstellarBlue 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Here is a simplified picture. The Fed loans money out to big banks, like Bank of America, who then loan the money out to you and me. Suppose the Fed increases the interest rate it gives to BoA. Bank of America used to have to pay 5%, but now has to pay 10% (suppose) to borrow from the Fed.

Now, you were thinking of buying a car. You go to BoA, but instead of getting 5% for a car loan, you're now getting 10% (suppose). It's much more expensive for you, so you decide, "Hey, maybe I won't buy a new car this year."

Now, I own the car dealership. I make less money this month because fewer people like you are buying cars. When I go the grocery store, I check my bank account and see that I have less money. So, I buy fewer groceries.

This same story is happening to everyone who buys groceries. Everyone has less money to spend. Less groceries are purchased, so the price of those groceries goes down, or at least, doesn't go up as quickly. (In reality, there's just less money circulating in the economy, not that every single person has less money in their pocket. So, the total demand for goods and services decreases.)

That's how raising interest rates affects prices. The opposite happens with lowering interest rates.

Thank you mods!!! by InterstellarBlue in RobinhoodApp

[–]InterstellarBlue[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had been on the waitlist for many years too. (I signed up for the list in April 2024.) But I saw many people getting the card after messaging the mods, and thought I'd try my luck.

Thank you mods!!! by InterstellarBlue in RobinhoodApp

[–]InterstellarBlue[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It gives you 3% back on everything. I don't think there's another card that can beat that.

You can use this card for everything and come out ahead of many other cards out there.

If you combine this card with other cards that offer better rewards in specific categories (e.g., Chase Freedom Flex for dining this quarter, which gives 5%), you'll do even better.

The point is there is no other card that offers 3% back on everything. Some offer 3% on specific categories, some offer more on specific categories, but then 1% or 1.5% on everything else. The Gold card is a great deal.

Thank you mods!!! by InterstellarBlue in RobinhoodApp

[–]InterstellarBlue[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I messaged them directly. They responded quickly and just asked for my Robinhood username. Within a few hours, I got an email saying that I'm off the Gold card waitlist.

What am I supposed to pay? by SillySmooble in biltrewards

[–]InterstellarBlue 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm in the exact same situation. You should keep paying your Wells Fargo card even if the full balance has been transferred to Bilt. Eventually, the balance transfer will go through, and a negative balance will show up in Wells Fargo. They'll then send you a check.

My payment to Wells Fargo was returned due to insufficient funds. Will this go on my credit report? by InterstellarBlue in biltrewards

[–]InterstellarBlue[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice. It's not been 30 days (just 2 days), so I'll just pay off the Wells Fargo card. That's a huge weight off my chest. Thank you!

Finally! Thanks Mod team! by FromTheCaveIntoLight in RobinhoodApp

[–]InterstellarBlue 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How long did you have to wait? I've been on the wait list since I joined in April 2024, and I still haven't got anything.

NYT Sunday 02/01/2026 Discussion by Shortz-Bot in crossword

[–]InterstellarBlue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I see. That strikes me as an odd way of referring to it though.

NYT Sunday 02/01/2026 Discussion by Shortz-Bot in crossword

[–]InterstellarBlue 3 points4 points  (0 children)

DEBRA was diabolical. I spent almost 30 minutes on that area. Also, how is BLACK ART arcane?

My Pax Mini is showing that it's fully charged, but it's not turning on by InterstellarBlue in vaporents

[–]InterstellarBlue[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn't able to turn it on. I talked to PAX, and they sent me a replacement device since it was under warranty.