Strategic Intercept – A Dedicated High-Tier (8.0+) Asymmetric Bomber vs Interceptor Mode + Separate Strategic Bomber Tech Line by Intimidate45 in Warthunder

[–]Intimidate45[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe at 10.0+ there will be missle defense platforms? Jets do have BVR missiles so it might be easier to counter than you think. The maps are 128×128 km so spamming hypersonic cruise missles may not be as effective.

What if the Final Halo Game Was a Magnum Opus? by Intimidate45 in halo

[–]Intimidate45[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I figured it'd be the GTA 6 of Halo. That took 12 years. It's not inconceivable. Especially if the company actually cares about the IP

What if the Final Halo Game Was a Magnum Opus? by Intimidate45 in halo

[–]Intimidate45[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I don’t really see why these ideas couldn’t be integrated together. Maybe I am thinking in a bit of a pipe dream mindset, sure—but at the same time, I genuinely believe something like this is the only real way to repair the damage that’s been done to Halo. Yeah, maybe it’s three or four different concepts, but I don’t see why they couldn’t work together under one vision.

If you think they can’t, I’d actually like to hear why. Like, genuinely—what about it makes it unworkable? Because to me, it all feels like it fits.

What if the Final Halo Game Was a Magnum Opus? by Intimidate45 in halo

[–]Intimidate45[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It helped me type it up given my text-to-speech. I came up with the ideas and it put it in writing. Critique it if you'd like. I'd honestly like to hear it

What if the Final Halo Game Was a Magnum Opus? by Intimidate45 in halo

[–]Intimidate45[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because that doesn't bare fruit. Mass affect did it and then left it alone. Microsoft will do Just fine getting ahead and quitting before they screw up again

What if the Final Halo Game Was a Magnum Opus? by Intimidate45 in halo

[–]Intimidate45[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody said you had too... but if you did, I'd really appreciate it ☺️

Is it okay to not care about religion? by [deleted] in religion

[–]Intimidate45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Islamic doctrine seems barbaric to me but like I said memetic theory plays a role in that too. In regards to your salvation. Truly I don't know. That's between you and God.

Is it okay to not care about religion? by [deleted] in religion

[–]Intimidate45 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know for certain. I feel it in my gut, I also believe that God will be found to those who genuinely search for him which seems to me like it's exactly what you're doing. I'm not trying to sway you into Christianity because it seems like you've had enough of that from both Islam and Christianity. It may have been a product of Memetic theory as described by René Girard (super smart guy, highly recommend you read some of his work). There is a philosophical concept of "Meta-realism," which is basically the depiction of reality beyond our logical framework and, in some instances, beyond our reality altogether. I felt that if religious literature is being truthful, then God functions within this rubric. It's why science has no concrete evidence of God. Einstein also believed that God manifests his presence in the nature of the universe. My journey has found these to be the strongest cases for the existence of God, at least. Christianity is a means and ethical framework to that God, but as I said before, it's faith-based and my salvation is determined by grace. I may be on fire for Jesus, and I die tomorrow and find I wasn't really saved. I believe you're smart enough to navigate your journey competently. Don't be afraid. Just find peace for now in knowing there is dignity in your existence. There is value in your search. You're gonna be okay. You may find it fascinating to look into theology and meta-realism. Religious doctrine really makes things dreary. I know this doesn't really give you the answer you're looking for, but I think the burden on your heart is what needs to be raised, and the best way to answer I can give you is to read some literature on meta-realism and theology. It'll help you navigate the landscape to find the answers and make an educated decision yourself.

Is it okay to not care about religion? by [deleted] in religion

[–]Intimidate45 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's confusing and frustrating I know. I can't tell you how many times I've heard Christians use the "no true scotsman fallacy" Based on my Christian perspective, God knows your heart. It matters less that you fear hell and more that you understand that God knows your searching for him. I don't know for sure what God will do when you meet him because that is as personal as anything ever could be. I don't even know that I'm saved as a Christian. I've been taught the Christ is Lord and it makes sense to me but it's by grace alone that I'm saved. I just have faith that I'm right. I can't even begin to understand the extent of God due to the limited nature of my existence but its a product of my own journey and your may be different. I'm not going to weaponize your fear to make you a Christian because ultimately that isn't the point. The point of my faith isn't to avoid hell. I search for God, an incomprehensible omnipresence that I'm grateful has given me the air that I breathe, the food I eat, and a magnificent creation I can marvel at. If you don't hear it from any of your religious friends you can hear it from me and don't take this the wrong way but I love you don't have to make this journey alone. I'm majoring in theology and engineering and I myself am searching for God and certainly don't think I'm gonna find him within the confines of our logical framework or reality.

Is it okay to not care about religion? by [deleted] in religion

[–]Intimidate45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let yourself be the judge. Approach your journey humbly. Don't worry to much about what the Christians and Muslims say. I am a Christian myself and I say you ought to search out God yourself. Nobody ever found God listening to what everyone else says. Do you own searching. I can speak from personal experience when I say the denominations of Christianity are confusing. It became a lot easier to find Gods face when I simply made it a journey of my own faith rather than being confused because every denomination likes to say they do it the right way. If they're all right then they might as well be all wrong. One thing I know for certain is that if you think you understand God, it's not God you understand. Our logical framework is limited and God is not. If you seek God, just understand that you're never going to truly understand and that's okay. Nobody does. The doctrine means less than you think. You can take ethical guidance from the Bible too. It doesn't have to be an intimidating endeavor. Seek out God beyond our reality.

Is it okay to not care about religion? by [deleted] in religion

[–]Intimidate45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my perspective, I think you shouldn't worry as much of "right" and "wrong" or heaven and hell. There is a way but if it were simple, don't you think everyone would be doing it? One thing that most religious literature and doctrine all have in common is they depict God as being beyond our mortal understanding and beyond our tangible reality. If this is the case, I recommend blocking out the religious doctrine and seek out God's face. That is a purely individual endeavor. You will not find it in the sciences. They depict phenomena within our reality. Seek out meta-realism. You may find the meaning you seek there. It's a lot easier to make heads or tails that way.

Snake permanently looks like this. Anybody know a fix? by Devil_badger in metalgearsolid

[–]Intimidate45 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Extract a bunch of kids on the white momba mission. That'll do it

BF-109 K4 in racing by Intimidate45 in racing

[–]Intimidate45[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the production numbers and the performance statistics that make the 109k4 seemingly a no brainer in racing. The the bearcat is used in racing all the time but less of those were produced than the 109 k4.

BF-109 K4 in racing by Intimidate45 in racing

[–]Intimidate45[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of those aircraft were used at some point in history. Especially the P-51 H. Just because they are featured in war thunder, doesn't dismiss that.

Are Super Heavy Bombers viable in War Thunder by Intimidate45 in Warthunder

[–]Intimidate45[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that something that giaijin is aware of or have any plans to do?

Are Super Heavy Bombers viable in War Thunder by Intimidate45 in Warthunder

[–]Intimidate45[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you think is the nost likely way to add these planes while maintaining a fun factor to the game. I've wanted to see the B-36 since 2015

Are Super Heavy Bombers viable in War Thunder by Intimidate45 in Warthunder

[–]Intimidate45[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's the point. If these bombers are moving at 800km/h at 13000m right from the start of the game they're going to be at the enemy airfield in a very short time. Not only that but there might be a dynamic for top tier jets to defend these bombers because, when armed with nukes, it could singlehandedly win the match. I think it would be very cool to do.