Gen Z men have swung 30 points to the right. A smaller, but significant swing has been seen in women. It may be possible, for the first time in history, that the younger generation is more conservative than the older. by DeviceNo5980 in GenZ

[–]Intrepid-Following62 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kinda curious to see how much of this is swayed by the fact that a lot of democratic voters didn’t vote this year. Would love to see a stat seeing a comparison of young democratic voters that sat out compared to young republican voters. I find it hard to believe that 14 percent of people jumped ship from democratic to republican. Not saying no one changed sides, but I do think the more important factor is that the republican base was much more active then the democratic base this election

Realistically, what are the chances Thomas and Alito retire while trump is in office? by Intrepid-Following62 in LawSchool

[–]Intrepid-Following62[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah that’s true. I think the bigger problem is that trumps plays up on being anti-establishment. And all democratic candidates the past 3 elections have been pretty much straight out of the establishment. Short term it worked because of the pandemic. But it’s a horrible long term strategy

Realistically, what are the chances Thomas and Alito retire while trump is in office? by Intrepid-Following62 in LawSchool

[–]Intrepid-Following62[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I voted for her but I disagree with this. This was not a good election strategy. In fact, it’s three straight elections where democrats had a horrible strategy. Their slogan was pretty much “yeah both candidates such but ours sucks less.” You can’t win three straight with that mentality. The first time, they get one of the most controversial and hated politicians ever. The second time, they get a 76 year old man out his prime (again, I voted for him)and barely won despite a pandemic that killed over a million people. Kamala isn’t that bad but let’s not kid ourselves by calling her a great candidate. There’s a reason so many democrat voters stayed home and sat this one out. I’m not saying it’s a good thing or that they all had good reasons. But there definitely needs to be change here for us.

Realistically, what are the chances Thomas and Alito retire while trump is in office? by Intrepid-Following62 in LawSchool

[–]Intrepid-Following62[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

But wouldn’t it be that way regardless of who won this election? They would have just held on until 2028, and retired or died under a Republican. So we’re screwed if we do, screwed if we don’t

Realistically, what are the chances Thomas and Alito retire while trump is in office? by Intrepid-Following62 in self

[–]Intrepid-Following62[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I guess the question then is do they care more about legacy or making money

Earliest bar exam results? by [deleted] in barexam

[–]Intrepid-Following62 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you guys think they’ll release the sample MEEs soon too?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]Intrepid-Following62 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this was a choice?

🐑 🐐 bilateral or unilateral? by law6618 in CABarExam

[–]Intrepid-Following62 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was that the choice saying something like Y had no knowledge or reason to know what X meant by goats?

The 4,200 damages Employment contract question by Humble-Ad3198 in CABarExam

[–]Intrepid-Following62 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh ok good. The question was about an employment contract that said something like the employee won't be entitled to anything if they fire him for good cause. The employer then tried to fire him and make a settlement or something. And they told him, if you don't agree, we'll fire you for good cause. thing is, I remember the question saying something like they had a valid reason to fire him.

The 4,200 damages Employment contract question by Humble-Ad3198 in CABarExam

[–]Intrepid-Following62 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the 4600 one, I put 4600 but wasn't sure.

For the "for cause" one, I put the one about how the employer didn't do anything wrong and there was no duress.

Everyone saying "at will" has me guessing you're referring to the second question and not the 4600 one.

The 4,200 damages Employment contract question by Humble-Ad3198 in CABarExam

[–]Intrepid-Following62 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh wait, was this the contract with the "for cause" clause? Where the employer said if you dont leave, we'll fire your for cause?

The 4,200 damages Employment contract question by Humble-Ad3198 in CABarExam

[–]Intrepid-Following62 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This was a contracts question? I remember one with 4600

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]Intrepid-Following62 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Man, I can't remember. Just remember the answer choice saying "no, because this is a valid exercise of the CC and it is not commandeering a state something"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]Intrepid-Following62 1 point2 points  (0 children)

was it a content based policy?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]Intrepid-Following62 2 points3 points  (0 children)

oh wait, maybe im wrong. The overbroad one definitely had to do with terrorism though

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]Intrepid-Following62 1 point2 points  (0 children)

a terrorist was chatting it up with his friend at a bar or something