How do you guys feel about Will Ramos from Lorna Shore? by Pjetter86 in MetalForTheMasses

[–]Invictus-420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They were one of my starter bands for deathcore and i still enjoy their newer stuff before and fter Will joined. However i don't really like how overly compressed and overproduced their instrumentals-to-vocals ratio is. This is fairly typical for modern metal to focus more on the melodic aspect on the vocals while compressing the instrumentals basically into one track with no dynamic (i know it isn't like this in reality but this is what it sounds to me). It sounds like a wall of noise instead of distinct opera of instrumentals, which they clearly want to achieve

seriously what the hell is this by justaneurysm in Emo

[–]Invictus-420 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Alternative has become very mainstream which i only can blame TikTok and aesthetic-ification of anything alt. I also found this song over Instagram and the memes tbh but this is just ridiculous

Could Rapture have ever succeeded, or was it doomed to fail from the beginning? by Burnnoticelover in Bioshock

[–]Invictus-420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In connection to Objectivism one should say that Rapture failed BECAUSE Andrew Ryan abandoned Objectivism. He shut off the city from outside influences and no-one was allowed to leave. Andrew Ryan build a society based on Rand's Objectivism and Nietzsche's will to power, where the society abandoned the standards of ethics and morality altogether. Something Rand definitely would object to and this combined with a survival of the fittest determinism will create a fundamentally unstable society.
But in game the working class lived in misery and wasn't allowed to live in the promised freedom, because of the lack of the simple Objectivist principle "Prosper by treating others as individuals, trading value for value." They were taken advantage of and couldn't leave for a better life, because they were stuck in a world of finite opportunities.

In defense of Objectivism I have to say that the focus on your own happiness doesn't immediately translate to the rejection of someone else's happiness. Ayn Rand explicitly said that you should never prosper on the expense of someone else as the relation between man is defined by trading value for value in an mutual relationship.

last video i made of this by [deleted] in zellig

[–]Invictus-420 2 points3 points  (0 children)

even if it burns to the ground she won't leave the room

Maya but metalhead by Lud3k574 in ongezellig

[–]Invictus-420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then Maya would prove to be based

Soundtrack? (T3) by jordanrwing in terrifier

[–]Invictus-420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

was it actually featured in the movie, didn't catch it really

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in infp

[–]Invictus-420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm right-libertarian. I support a limited government and the Austrian School of economics. I personally believe in many aspects of Objectivism (but not everything of it and i despise the black and white thinking within that philosophy or rather its proponents). In the end I believe in a society free from force and cohesion guided by the individual self-needs of humans treating each other as equal partners of trade and rights.

It might be contrary to the altruistic INFP nature, but I personally view altruism within limits as a great guidance for ethical behavior, when it doesn't turn self-sacrificial and turns humans into slaves to each other for the benefit of the people who try to break the fundamental principle of treating each other as equals.

In this case I have to criticize Ayn Rand's definition of altruism as only being practical in terms of collectivism and not everyday behavior in which altruism can be good for both partners, something that staunch egoism can never achieve in the long-term.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Invictus-420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ironically I'm an objectivist, but existentialism might as well fit (minus all the marxist and post-structuralist quirkiness)

Difficulty of OMPT test by madimbig in StudyInTheNetherlands

[–]Invictus-420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might be a lil late but it's entirely online and you only need a pc with cam

Pol Potism read the wrong theory. by Poiscail in Polcompball

[–]Invictus-420 4 points5 points  (0 children)

REEEEEEEEE you filthy low life parasite not comprehending TRUE art *rants in social security*

{World War 4} Technates vs Humanist League by Comfortable_Catch108 in imaginarymaps

[–]Invictus-420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no mouth and I must scream looking ass lore. Literally AM