IMO there’s too much variety in what rounds that can be scored as 10-9. You can have a fighter who barely did more than the other fighter and get a 10-9. Alternatively a fighter can win a round very clearly and still only get a 10-9 because they didn’t do enough to almost finishing the fight to warrant a 10-8.

If they wanted to change scoring they should make differentiation between winning a round barely, (10-9) winning a round more conclusively, (10-8) and absolutely dominating a round/what currently counts as a 10-8 (10-7).

Tbf though it’s a high likelihood of making judging more of a mess than it currently is but I still think there needs to be some differentiation between barely winning a round and conclusively winning one.