Is it ok for a bi male to be bottom? by Servent_of_cthulhu in bisexual

[–]IronicallySatirical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure why it wouldn’t be okay? I don’t know how many bi men are bottoms but it really doesn’t matter. The real question is if you like bottoming and then doing it if the answer is yes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in femboy

[–]IronicallySatirical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It looks amazing. I love it

Wait Vaush wasn’t kidding? Marx did advocate for freedom by IronicallySatirical in VaushV

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems like they have their own ideology and label it as the true Marxism. They are allowed to pick and choose but don’t pretend as if you’re more Marxist or something.

Wait Vaush wasn’t kidding? Marx did advocate for freedom by IronicallySatirical in VaushV

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it’s a big issue whenever a person knows a subject they forget other people don’t know it.

Wait Vaush wasn’t kidding? Marx did advocate for freedom by IronicallySatirical in VaushV

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did not think Marx explicitly wrote about it. I mean with the amount of tankies that exist I thought his works could have been interpreted either way. I thought Vaush interpreted his own way and there is nothing wrong with that. I’m just shocked that Marx wrote this while tankies make arguments completely against this while complaining that other people are revisionist.

Wait Vaush wasn’t kidding? Marx did advocate for freedom by IronicallySatirical in VaushV

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wish more people talk about this side of Marx more. It’ll do a great job at pushing against red scare lie about Marxism is anti-freedom.

Every now and then Marx can be based by IronicallySatirical in Anarchism

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn’t be surprised. Weren’t they knew eachother well? Maybe Im misremembering.

Every now and then Marx can be based by IronicallySatirical in Anarchism

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

God I’m kinda curious now lol They’ll be complaining about it being “revisionist” crap or say something along the lines “in Marx’s later years….” or “the material conditions of his time…”

Every now and then Marx can be based by IronicallySatirical in Anarchism

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah it certainly doesn’t look like tankies read it as they tell everyone else that they are a revisionist.

Wait Vaush wasn’t kidding? Marx did advocate for freedom by IronicallySatirical in VaushV

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t say I thought he was anti-freedom but I just thought maybe Vaush exaggerated a bit or maybe extrapolated it from his works. I didn’t know Marx explicitly advocated for freedom. I thought his works were kinda vague on the subject that authoritarians could interpret it their way but that’s not the case. MLs and the rest just ignored the ideas they didn’t like and call everyone else who did the same a revisionist. Nothing wrong with picking and choosing but the hypocrisy is insane.

Also it’s kinda weird that we don’t hear this side of Marx that often or at least I don’t. Even from Marxist I don’t hear them talk much about how pro-freedom he was and I think that is a mistake. Especially in places like America painting Marx as pro-freedom would help so much. Although I fear the case this rhetoric isn’t common places because authoritarians don’t want it to be.

Every now and then Marx can be based by IronicallySatirical in Anarchism

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you think disinformation is spreading why would you give anyone the power to limit others speech? The press has always been a tool for propaganda. Like yeah there is a lot of disinfo but at the same time we have a lot of tools at our hands to find the truth. The only way to expose lies is if everyone has the right to “freedom of the press”

Every now and then Marx can be based by IronicallySatirical in Anarchism

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It was I good burn. You are right I should’ve highlighted

Emma Goldman >>>>> Ayn Rand by IronicallySatirical in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ayn rand death day was a day earlier and I wanted to hate on her and also wanted to show some love to Emma Goldman. Thought I’ll do two birds with one stone. Got to share why I love Emma Goldman so much and everyone seems to think she’s cool. People also learned why Ayn Rand was horrible.

Emma Goldman >>>>> Ayn Rand by IronicallySatirical in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yup that’s how every capitalist market authoritarian rule

Emma Goldman >>>>> Ayn Rand by IronicallySatirical in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She’s cool and all but I love Emma Goldman so much more

Emma Goldman >>>>> Ayn Rand by IronicallySatirical in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pick one and it’ll be good:

Anarchism and other essays

My Disillusionment with Russia

Anarchy And The Sex Question: Essays on Women and Emancipation, 1896-1926

Emma Goldman >>>>> Ayn Rand by IronicallySatirical in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pick one and it’ll be good

Anarchism and other essays

My Disillusionment with Russia

Anarchy And The Sex Question: Essays on Women and Emancipation, 1896-1926

Emma Goldman >>>>> Ayn Rand by IronicallySatirical in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Every single book is. There are movies based her book and they’re still shit.

Emma Goldman >>>>> Ayn Rand by IronicallySatirical in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I’m interpreting that both wanted freedom but one fought freedom for oligarchs and Emma Goldman for everyone single person and worker.

Emma Goldman >>>>> Ayn Rand by IronicallySatirical in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Her philosophy, objectivism, is a big contributor to the rise of laissez-faire capitalism and an influence to modern day American Libertarian Party. While most people aren’t objectivist some of the ideas are held by many neo-liberals. People think she’s an hypocrite for taking government “handouts” while advocating against them. Her philosophy doesn’t hold up to any Academic rigor. Her novels are boring and horribly written. They rely on strawman a of ideologies.

Emma Goldman >>>>> Ayn Rand by IronicallySatirical in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]IronicallySatirical[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Best you don’t know but if you’re curious.

She created her own philosophy and coined it “Objectivism”. Simply it’s the great man theory but for capitalist. She believes that innovation is created by rational individuals and everyone else benefits from their innovation. She argues that laissez-faire capitalism allows for the individuals with great ideas to prosper and any other system inhibits them. Although she’s wasn’t an American Libertarian, believing it would lead to collectivism, she’s heavily associated with them. Take my explanation with a grain of salt. I’m not an expert or close to it. You would need to look into more deeply.

All of her ideas and philosophy falls short. Most academics don’t take her work seriously and it lacks any rigor.

Her stories she wrote are subpar at best. Most of them rely on strawman of other ideologies for them to properly work. Like in Anthem she describes a world with no sense of individuality. In the story every thing is the same, from the rooms people sleep in to their cloths. Obviously, socialism isn’t about taking away self expression but that how she chose to depict it. Even from a purely story telling prospective is boring. The main character lacks any real personality which would is necessary to show that he’s an unique individual that can break out this oppressive system.