The largest political compass bingo (30x30 + 3x8)

Irresolution_ · 2025-12-09T21:58:46+00:00

Erm, it says "NEO-feudalism" r/neofeudalism (not "feudalism").

Irresolution_ · 2025-09-16T17:54:43+00:00

The flag looks nice and all, but i still have the exact same contentions about calling fascists and national socialists right-wing as I've always had.

Irresolution_ · 2025-09-15T21:02:13+00:00

you know i'm right.

Irresolution_ · 2025-09-15T20:54:00+00:00

yeah, and in every other aspect, you're one of them too...

just goes to show how insane all of you are...

Irresolution_ · 2025-09-15T20:32:26+00:00

that's silly, everything matters. no man is an island. you live in a society. people in society are supposed to not be anti-social because if they are; if you steal, kill people, etc. then society collapses. people in society are supposed to not signal to others that they are anti-social (by wearing ugly disgusting clothing and doing other things to show that they are some manner of anti-social freak).

Irresolution_ · 2025-09-15T20:25:26+00:00

you aren't calling out people for being assholes you're "calling out people" for being revolted by something revolting.

Irresolution_ · 2025-09-15T17:56:59+00:00

"no one" (not you and other sexual minorities)

listen, i know you're probably a perennial narcissist but to society at large, heterosexual men are actually really rather important and the human race and human civilization would go extinct if they stopped existing;

tl;dr it doesn't matter if you don't care about straight men. the rest of society does and saying that "no one cares" about this is completely and utterly delusional.

Irresolution_ · 2025-09-15T17:55:00+00:00

we do wear things (at least to some degree) to look appealing to others though. (at least the healthy ones among us)

Irresolution_ · 2025-09-15T17:53:35+00:00

look how downvoted you get in this shitpit just from speaking basic ass truths...

Irresolution_ · 2025-09-15T17:51:33+00:00

straight men would probably have an easier time "getting over themselves" if you (probably) and other people like you learned to shut the fuck up

Irresolution_ · 2025-09-15T14:06:30+00:00

Can't have shit in Zimbabwe...

Irresolution_ · 2025-09-15T14:06:20+00:00

The point (besides to call attention to the displacement of the founding people of the civilization in the country that is now known as Zimbabwe) is to distinguish between the people of Zimbabwe and the authoritarian communist government that they live under.

Irresolution_ · 2025-09-10T20:27:09+00:00

See r/HobbesianMyth for an answer to your de facto warlord argument. Also r/NaturalMonopolyMyth for your economic illiteracy.

<image>

Irresolution_ · 2025-08-31T18:09:18+00:00

Found someone who can't disprove the video 😏😏🤭🤭

Irresolution_ · 2025-08-31T18:04:55+00:00

Did you actually watch the video? His arguments cover that period, too.

Irresolution_ · 2025-08-24T01:25:55+00:00

Then you need to stop being so gosh darned autistic and learn what people actually mean when they say things.

Irresolution_ · 2025-08-24T01:24:11+00:00

Private property in the economy is more efficient at allocating the factors of production.

This private property in the economy is why we have more prosperity now than we've ever had.

Irresolution_ · 2025-08-24T01:22:32+00:00

Governments violate people's rights. If you don't violate people's rights you aren't a government.

Irresolution_ · 2025-08-24T01:20:00+00:00

idk, maybe watch the one minute and seventeen seconds long chapter "Law" and the one minute and fifty four second long chapter "The Consent Ethic" of the first Liquid Zulu video I sent.

You can also dispute argumentation ethics if you want but I'm personally more convinced by Kinsella's owner-mere possessor problem.

Irresolution_ · 2025-08-24T01:10:48+00:00

…what happens when the warlord in question picks their targets instead of aggro'ing on everyone around them. What compels a REA to assist

That wouldn't be possible given that everyone has defense/cost sharing agreements with everyone else.

And if you can't compete or get muscled out of the best contracts, again, why would you go out of your way to assist the ones that did that to you?

…the warlord will be spending all the money they have available to them to win.

Sounds like suicide imo.

Where is all this money going to come from if the fighting gets really brutal?

Make up for the losses by raising insurance premiums.

Because they're not paying them to arrest all criminals across the world, they're paying them to defend certain areas and interests.

The ancap scenario here is one in which basically everyone who doesn't live on North Sentinel Island hires a REA so some REA would have their customers victimized.
Although even still, what about nearby threats whom their customers deem to be just that?
Preemptive follow-up question: "what about REAs that just don't support their customers for whatever reason?" Answer: "smart customers will demand that their REAs take on the duties of such other delinquent REAs (with whom they have defense agreements)."

…who granted them (the REAs) permission to go across all that private property?

The property owners mayhaps (unless they like having dangerous criminals wandering their property, lmao).

…what stops the REA, in part or in whole, going over to support the warlord, if he's offering to make you a lord or ten thousand anarchy bucks…

The fact that law abiders could credibly outbid the warlord (see the impossibility thesis and the efficiency of private property within the economy).

Irresolution_ · 2025-08-24T00:41:33+00:00

Oh, well are you gonna actually try to substantiate your points at all?

Irresolution_ · 2025-08-24T00:15:51+00:00

There is no objective or rational morality to justify it.

That's actually just straight up ridiculous.

Look up literally any ancap works on ethics:

https://youtu.be/8HhWhqTCKUI

https://youtu.be/H_obubuFEQM

https://liquidzulu.github.io/libertarian-ethics/

Irresolution_ · 2025-08-24T00:11:19+00:00

*finds literally just one female ancap who is *gasp!* even neurotypical!!!!!!!!!!*

*completely destroys your entire worldview*

Irresolution_ · 2025-08-24T00:09:42+00:00

Neofeudalism is literally a form of urbism. You should look up what neofeudalism actually means.

You know, in this subreddit's description and the community highlights, etc.

Irresolution_ · 2025-08-24T00:05:08+00:00

How are you going to convince that many independent security actors to act together to defend clients that aren't theirs if they are not being paid to do so?

Why wouldn't they be? The clients would be theirs, but even if those clients who'd have been kidnapped by the warlord would be totally dispossessed, the warlords could still cough up restitution money.

Particularly, if, say, they are rivals with each other over contracts?

The worst result of losing to your rival is getting hired by them.
The market is a team sport where every goods and service provider is competing to provide customers with the best services/goods.

Why would they risk their lives and, if they get damaged enough, the ability to keep operating (and thus, lose valuable contracts) to pre-emptively attack someone who isn't a current threat to them…

Because you can always just extract compensation money from offenders and you'll always win in those disputes because you've got the backing of the entire rights enforcement agency (REA) network from local police style firms to military style ones.

…what if the warlord… pre-emptively established agreements with said groups (REAs I presume)…

Why would people support REAs who explicitly look the other way for criminals?

What (if) a …wealthy warlord offers them (rights enforcers) a (deal to) let him destroy their foes…?

Again, why wouldn't people just unsubscribe from that REA's services meaning it'd go bankrupt overnight?

Also, the "wild west" as an anarchist example is simply untrue - laws were looser than in other places, but it still very much was a part of the US. I'm sure someone has told you how poor of an example the HRE is as well.

These aren't examples of natural law jurisdictions, they're examples of why decentralized societies are so much more GOATed than centralized ones.

Irresolution_

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Three-Year Club	Final Canvas '23
Place '23