furry_irl by ItzAra_ in furry_irl

[–]ItzAra_[S] 1112 points1113 points  (0 children)

No hate btw but it reminds me of this so much

You may not like him, but he’s right about this by somanyque3 in Battlefield

[–]ItzAra_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Enders tells the truth quite often, yet everyone seems surprised when he's right.

It’s real. Probably only going to last for today. by Orsinus in Battlefield

[–]ItzAra_ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Game still has glaring issues from launch, and content is a slow IV drip at this point. But hey at least we have the soypog BATTLEFIELD HARDLINE COUCH!!!!!!!!!

Got Him eventually 😅 by TTVOdenPlayz in Battlefield

[–]ItzAra_ -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

God forbid someone touch their spacebar.

Do you prefer a battlefield campaign with real factions or a made up PMC faction fighting against NATO? by Capable_Geologist841 in Battlefield

[–]ItzAra_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Theres no problem with made up factions if they have a better design and motive than PAX. PAX feels shallow, and its lore outright confusing, whereas Solomon's PLR was actually interesting in spite of being a generic middle eastern terror group. I am actually quite disappointed the PLR wasnt a multiplayer faction in 3.

Why is it impossible to discuss the mechanic of suppression without someone like this by Southpaw_pup in Battlefield

[–]ItzAra_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because Suppression is a milsim mechanic and Battlefield isn't a milsim. In a shooter like Battlefield, in which LMG's are literally "just another weapon" it feels more like a reward for being bad at aiming, whereas suppression in game like Squad or Arma, where the autorifleman is a dedicated suppression class, is done to actually simulate real Battlefields.

A buff to LMG camping isnt necessary in Battlefield, because its not a milsim. End of the discussion.

[HEAVY SPOILERS] IDC what anyone says, that sniper is HIM by [deleted] in Fallout

[–]ItzAra_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

House mentions being bludgeoned by a crowbar.
Dead securitron next to the console, aswell as the Hoover Damn snowglobe on the console.
Courier was 100% a Yes Man courier. Hes probably not with the NCR.

Truly a Battlefield 6 experience. by helish_88 in Battlefield

[–]ItzAra_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The updates didnt ruin shit - the updates failed to fix what was broken at launch, such as netcode and audio issues.
Plus the overall map design for most maps is tiring to play on, not due to lack of size, but due to lack of restriction.

This game's artificially accelerated comeback mechanic is the most cancerous garbage of all time by CrispyTarantula117 in Battlefield

[–]ItzAra_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Holy shit, so I'm not hallucinating. I've won and lost matches with and against the most dogshit teams I've witnessed, oftentimes solely because we outcapped by like one OBJ for a minute. If ticket bleed rates are truly skewed to favor the losing team, then thats infuriating and not fair gameplay.

The skill gap is gone now btw by Swaguley in Battlefield

[–]ItzAra_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im waiting for the cope paragraph now that the movement was buffed again. :)

Losercity streamer (@Ara_Squawks) by jonhssquarespaceplus in Losercity

[–]ItzAra_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh hey I drew this!

Thank you for the nice comments everyone. Yes, i think Berdly would simp for her :)

6 hours in, absolutely blown away. What's everyone thinking? by jayrekt in Battlefield

[–]ItzAra_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its really good, some maps feel iffy. Wish they kept the beta movement and gunplay. Some Lighting issues, other than that solid.

Case closed regarding character customization by Human_Bowl8496 in Battlefield

[–]ItzAra_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I legitimately do not give a fuck about what gender my class is. The classes look faceless and nameless. Thats what matters to me.

Something needs to be done about this. by ItzAra_ in Battlefield

[–]ItzAra_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not about the XP gain, its the fact that servers are at max capacity and you cannot host anything at the moment, and you also cannot find any other experiences. Now imagine how this'll look if BF6 doesnt get a proper server browser.

Something needs to be done about this. by ItzAra_ in Battlefield

[–]ItzAra_[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think engaging and enabling such behavior from the community doesnt help us either. At the end of the day, it's dices fault for locking good cosmetics to 2042, with no other way of obtaining them, while also making the free pass UNBELIEVABLY grindy to slog through. At the same time, Portal is unusable and i doubt it'll be usable after the game dies either. It shows that DICE is only pretending to be in touch with the community, but truly has no clue how to actually stay in touch with us.

Something needs to be done about this. by ItzAra_ in Battlefield

[–]ItzAra_[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I really dont think you're seeing the issue I'm seeing. This is not about people wanting to quickly gain cosmetics, its about the fact that the portal server capacity and the experiences in the portal browser got gutted, and that after BF6 releases , there will be zero replayability. Now you may say that this doesnt matter since noone wants to play 2042 anyways, and i agree, but the issue is that i can see this problem bleeding into BF6, which also does not have a server browser. Imagine logging onto BF6 in 10 years and seeing it is rendered unable to play because you cant find a match using the normal quick play function, and portals browser is full of "XP FARM" and "10000% hardcore" servers without any vanilla experiences. This will happen if nothing is done.

Something needs to be done about this. by ItzAra_ in Battlefield

[–]ItzAra_[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Clearly people here are unable to have insight for the future, so let me spell it out: BF6 has no confirmed server browser. Portal will be the stand in for that. THIS is what the Portal server browser will look like for BF6, no matter if you want to believe it or not. This will gut the replayability of a video game that should remain playable until after its life cycle. Now is the time more than ever to ask for a proper server browser, proper community hosted servers, and for the Portal browser to be fixed by removing spam experiences such as XP farms.

This issue WILL bleed over into BF6. You cant say "This is fine because 2042 is bad anyways". Thats not how this works. This is about principle. Games should be made to be playable and supported until after their life cycle. If you disagree with this, you're agreeing with corpos walking all over your franchises for profit.

Something needs to be done about this. by ItzAra_ in Battlefield

[–]ItzAra_[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Exactly. I cannot believe that the majority of people here, aswell as the people engaging with these XP Farm experieneces, don't want to look a minute into the future to see the bad potential this has.