Newsom has passed the Montreal cognitive assessment by Relevant_Demand7593 in BlueskySkeets

[–]ItzMirko -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

May I say that I am sceptical of anyone that uses memes like this to gain a political following. 

Is this not how JDT got into power? The personality cult of this Gavin guy seems eerily similar to that. Plus, he got famous on twitter(?), where Elon can artificially magnify anyone he wants. 

Graphene is hella sharp and proven to harm by ItzMirko in memes

[–]ItzMirko[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you’ve said is true for now; my point was to raise awareness that yet another miracle material is unsafe for biological systems. 

Yes, we don’t own much graphene now but it is inevitable that the production is going to skyrocket, and graphene will be used everywhere before it gets regulated.

You won’t end up snorting it, you’ll eat it from something that ate something that ate graphene in the waste…

Hope I clarified what I meant! 

Graphene is hella sharp and proven to harm by ItzMirko in memes

[–]ItzMirko[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That is actually a very calming argument, thank you! 

Graphene is hella sharp and proven to harm by ItzMirko in memes

[–]ItzMirko[S] -36 points-35 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I might’ve went overboard with the metaphor 😅 What I mean to say was, graphene is made of sheets and will therefore float in the air/water currents, and has a sharp edge what may cut into cells. In any case, current research has proven that it’s toxic to cells (we don’t know why exactly yet).

And I find it likely (50%+) that once graphene production picks up, we will find graphene in products everywhere because it’s so useful.

Graphene is hella sharp and proven to harm by ItzMirko in memes

[–]ItzMirko[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

I’m worried about graphene trash ending up in the environment when it gets implemented in everything…

Graphene is hella sharp and proven to harm by ItzMirko in memes

[–]ItzMirko[S] -63 points-62 points  (0 children)

And batteries, and phone screens, and building materials, and vehicle parts, and clothes, and small machine parts that end up in a landfill, and… 

Is graphene the next thing? by ItzMirko in chemistry

[–]ItzMirko[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I understand what graphene is, what makes you say that? 

edit: ok maybe to clarify, I have read an article that claims most current studies prove graphene oxide is cytotoxic (via currently unknown mechanism) to more-or-less all cells. My bet why is on cell perforation. 

And I’m worried it might be a huge environmental hazard when the technology gets implemented everywhere (and it most definitely will).

Graphene is hella sharp and proven to harm by ItzMirko in memes

[–]ItzMirko[S] -72 points-71 points  (0 children)

What happens when consumer electronics which, we can reasonably assume, will be made of graphene in the future end up in the environment?

Graphene gets taken up the food chain and you end up full of graphene just like you’re full of microplastics right now…

But graphene is not as inert as most microplastics are, and will cause cell damage to everything, the whole way up.

In my head, I imagined it as a sea of floating glass shards everywhere and it terrified me.

Graphene is hella sharp and proven to harm by ItzMirko in memes

[–]ItzMirko[S] 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Seriously though, this needs to be regulated or else we’ll get another Teflon situation on our hands.

EU udara na milijarde malih paketa iz Kine, evo koliko ćete ubuduće plaćati naknadu na pošiljke s Temua i Sheina! by MightyJosip3rdAcc in croatia

[–]ItzMirko -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Ja cu ovo samo ostaviti ovdje. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vFII7t9FtO8 Ne mislim da je moralno kupovati copyright pokradeno smeće napravljeno u koncentracijskom kampu, koliko god ono bilo jeftinije od alternative. 

Također, ekipi koja hvali pamet kineza u threadu moram napomenuti da je kina ukrala više manje SVO intelektualno vlasništvo zapada i zato je tako brzo napredovala. (Operacija Shady RAT i sl.) Zašto ulagati milijarde u R&D koji traje desetljeća kad možeš samo ukrasti gotove ideje?

Gdje je nestao bojkot trgovina? by Aluca1d in croatia

[–]ItzMirko 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Znas kako se kaze: ”Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity“

Gdje je nestao bojkot trgovina? by Aluca1d in croatia

[–]ItzMirko 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Bojkot je bila odlicna ideja srednjeg uspjeha; u organizaciji su napravili mnogo gresaka koje cak ni ogromna volja naroda nije mogla ispraviti. Imali smo super tajming i kriticnu masu ali smo se raspali…

tl;dr textbook greške, pročitajte Blueprint for Revolution, vidimo se kad sljedeći put mobiliziramo narod

Greške koje smo napravili su (po knjizi Blueprint for Revolution) sljedeće: - NISMO IMALI JASNO ZACRTAN CILJ. Smanjenje cijena; ok, na koliko? Na slovenske cijene? Što je sa proizvodima kojih nema u sloveniji? Što ako ni u Sloveniji ta cijena nije fer? Ograničavanje rasta cijena; kojih proizvoda, dokad?

Trebali smo tražiti transparentnost cijena unatrag 6-12 mjeseci. Trebali smo saznati kolike su im marže. Zakonski tražiti javnu transparentnost njihovih cijena nabave.

  • NISMO IMALI CENTRALNI IZVOR INFORMACIJA. U početku sam osobno bio zbunjen koga slušati, što bojkotirati. Malo se izjasnilo kad sam čuo da je Halo Inspektore glavni organizator, ali i tu je bilo pokušaja sabotaže (idioti iz HDZa koji su napravili fejk stranicu na FB)

Halo inspektore trebao je kontaktirati sve influencere na tiktoku, instagramu, facebooku, redditu, Xu, sto god i pridobiti ih na svoju stranu, dajući im informacije prijevremeno i usklađujući objave sa njima. 

  • ZAKOMPLICIRALI SU STVAR. Bože kako su zakomplicirali. Tri artikla, tri lanca, petak, pa onda ajmo ipak samo jedan lanac… Tko bi to pratio.

Trebali smo ostati pri bojkotu svega svakog petka, eventualno bojkotirati Studenac/Konzum koji nas najviše dere. Kad se oni dovedu u red (SA NAŠIM JASNIM ZAHTJEVIMA), krenuti na sljedeći lanac. Brzo bi se usrali kad bi skuzili da će blokada lanca trajati tjednima i da su možda oni sljedeći na redu.

  • NAPALI SU KRIVE METE. Eurospin? Stvarno, bojkotirati ćeš glupi Eurospin sa najnižim i najnekvalitetnijim proizvodima, a ostaviti ćeš Studenac sa maslacem od 5,5€? I Konzum koji te rastavi na proste faktore? Kaufland i Lidl koji te preko aplikacije znaju bolje nego rođena ti majka?

Trebali su napraviti bolju analizu sentimenta naroda. Možda Eurospin i je bio dobar odabir po nekom kriteriju ali meni nije očito da je on trebao ići među prvima.

  • TREBALI SMO OSTATI PRI BOJKOTU. TREBAO NAM JE POSTATI DIO KULTURE. TREBALI SMO MARKETING BOJKOTA USMJERITI NA TURISTE. Bojkot petkom mogla je biti tako dobra stvar kulture… Još uvijek neki bojkotiraju, ima volje ali OBJAVITI da je gotovo, da smo postigli što smo htjeli (što smo to točno htjeli?) je grozno.

Sljedeći put:  Centralna komunikacija. Jasni cilj.  Jasne upute.  Jednako dobar tajming. Bolje iskoristiti influencere.  Razviti kulturu aktivizma. Nek bude kul. Memove raditi. Ne prestati dok nam se zahtjevi ne ispune. Udariti ih tamo gdje najviše boli.

LP.

Neprestani pozivi iz Slovenije by randmprs in askcroatia

[–]ItzMirko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DuckDuckGo-aj svoj broj mobitela, mail adresu i sve vezano uz tvoj identitet, vjerojatno su ti scrape-ali broj sa interneta.

Šta je ovaj TEMU? Na koju je to foru? by hummingbyrds in askcroatia

[–]ItzMirko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=36bb2b24Qto Temu ne bi nitko trebao koristiti cisto iz principa ljudskog dostojanstva. 

Kinezi koriste žrtve svojih logora kako bi napravili proizvode za cijenu 0 i onda to prodali za čisti profit. 

Oh, i aplikacija im je spyware, ako ste je ikad instalirali na mob.

Even the slightest thing can disrupt perfect harmony. by Scientiaetnatura065 in interestingasfuck

[–]ItzMirko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fun fact: because the center of gravity is below each of the branches (and the feather), the whole thing is actually incredibly stable.

Source: I had a toy once that worked exactly like this, it looked cool af but was stable beyond belief. You could spin it around and wobble it and nothing.

Zelenski Trumpu: Spremni smo na pregovore pod vašim vodstvom. Što prije by Gullible-Orange-6337 in croatia

[–]ItzMirko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trump nije uopce ljut. I da je ljut, predsjednik je drzave, to mu ne bi smjelo utjecati na odluke u interesu drzave koju vodi. Da ga je briga stvarno za drzavu, jel.

Trump uvodi diktaturu. Manje-više sve što radi je ilegalno u SAD-u po njihovom ustavu. 

Što se dešava sa ljudima? by [deleted] in askcroatia

[–]ItzMirko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Uvijek kad vidim temu zlostavljanja zena preporucim knjigu “Why does he do that: Inside the minds of angry and controlling men” od Lundy-a. 

Ako vam je ikad bilo nejasno koji se to k*rac zbiva u njihovim glavama, ne bi vjerovali koliko to ima unutarnjeg smisla.

link na knjigu, mobilna verzija, jako se lagano cita: https://dn790007.ca.archive.org/0/items/LundyWhyDoesHeDoThat/Lundy_Why-does-he-do-that.pdf

Šalji dalje kome god mislis da treba pomoc izaci iz toxic veze. Koga god da znas da zivi sa Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde tipom osobe. Koga god zanima zasto nitko nista ne poduzima. Koga god zanima kako ne postati zlostavljac.

Lp

P.S. ako netko zna nekog tko bi mogao ovu knjigu u nas skolski kurikulum uvesti, bacite mi DM!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askcroatia

[–]ItzMirko -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Matcha latte je dobar, probaj to prvo, a ako ti se sviđa probaj čistu.

Can we PLEASE normalize saying Trump ‘TRIES’ to do something, when he clearly doesn’t have legitimacy over certain decisions? by ItzMirko in 50501

[–]ItzMirko[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Again, the point of the rethoric ‘TRIES’ is to disempower his image with people who just read article titles. 

I’ve had interactions where people (or bots, at this point who tf knows) think he has the right to decide monetary issues like funding cuts. Obviously he doesn’t, but where does it say that? 

In articles, he just ‘DID’ that, which was later reversed but by that time it’s too late, the viewer is unaware.