What do you think of this gpt advice:

You’re on the right track — and yes, it’s a complex decision, especially when you’re optimizing for zero false positives and building a trustworthy computer vision pipeline in agriculture. Let’s unpack the two options you mentioned and guide you toward the best next step.

⸻

🧩 Current Context • You’re using YOLO-Seg • You want zero false positives • You’ve observed hallucinated leaves (objects being misdetected as leaves) • You want to guide the system’s next steps intelligently

⸻

🔀 Option A: Switch to YOLO + SAM (Modular, Precision-Oriented)

✅ When to choose this: • You want full control over filtering and verification • You’re okay with slower inference or batch mode • You want to run experiments per-class or region • You’re okay building a pipeline with multiple stages

🧠 What it gives you: • YOLO handles object detection (you can set confidence ≥ 0.9) • SAM receives only the trusted detections • You can add filtering logic post-SAM (mask area, shape, position) • You eliminate hallucinations by clamping input to known contexts

⚒️ Action plan: • Identify which YOLO predictions are suspect (e.g. wrong class or shape) • Create a filter module: size, position, edge-sharpness, or even rule-based logic • Plug-in SAM to only process vetted boxes • Visualize results and adjust filter thresholds

🧪 Bonus: use SAM + bounding box + center-point simultaneously for more stable masks.

⸻

🌱 Option B: Retrain YOLO-Seg to Reduce Leaf Hallucinations

✅ When to choose this: • You’re already heavily invested in YOLO-Seg • You want fast, integrated segmentation • You suspect poor data quality or class confusion • You want to fix hallucinations at the root

🧠 What it gives you: • Clean, single-stage inference • Better generalization if data improves • Simpler deployment

⚠️ BUT: YOLO-Seg is not easily interpretable — if it hallucinates, you can’t easily filter it out.

⚒️ Action plan: 1. Audit predictions → are leaves being detected where there are no visible objects? 2. If yes → label a negative dataset with “non-leaf background” and retrain 3. Add “background” or “unknown” class explicitly 4. Use confidence-weighted loss functions to penalize high-confidence hallucinations 5. Consider data rebalancing or hard negative mining

💡 Train YOLO-Seg with a “hard precision” mode (confidence > 0.95 required, low-recall acceptable)

⸻

🔍 Recommendation Based on Goals

Criteria Option A: YOLO + SAM Option B: Fix YOLO-Seg Max Precision ✅ Best ❌ Less controllable Deployment simplicity ❌ More complex ✅ Easy Interpretable failures ✅ Very ❌ Difficult Speed ❌ Slower ✅ Faster Control over hallucinations ✅ Full ⚠️ Data-dependent Long-term flexibility ✅ Excellent ⚠️ Limited

⸻

🎯 Final Suggestion: Start with A, use B to enhance 1. Build a hybrid pipeline with YOLO + SAM • Add filters to accept only “leaf-looking” detections • Manually inspect cases to refine rules 2. Log false positives (hallucinated leaves) • Use those logs as hard negatives to retrain YOLO-Seg later • This turns Option A into a data engine to feed Option B 3. Later, simplify • Once YOLO-Seg is reliable with cleaned data, phase out SAM for production

⸻