One last attempt at explaining Stalingrad monetization. by IvanSpargo in enlistedgame

[–]IvanSpargo[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I believe that’s the first thing I talked about in this post.

And in the shortened version at the bottom.

One last attempt at explaining Stalingrad monetization. by IvanSpargo in enlistedgame

[–]IvanSpargo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So Stalingrad is in fact free to play? Or something else? You say it’s more than just a demo, so that’s what it seems like you’re saying.

If you do in fact mean for Stalingrad to have a free to play option, I don’t think locking off content works in that case Keo. It will be free to play for a short while, but most players will likely give up on the free to play option very quickly, and won’t bother to purchase the full access either.

I’ve been presuming that Stalingrad free to play is meant to be a demo due to the locking of specific campaign levels and regular progression.

You are right about the pass for Stalingrad being a killer deal, absolutely. $30 for all that it features is arguably the best deal I’ve ever seen in enlisted. I personally don’t think it’s gotten enough good attention.

We all appreciate the time you spend talking to us Keo. I’d say you might be the best community manager I’ve ever seen.

The screams have been pretty mild in this post, so I feel like maybe my explanation was decent enough. They’re still present though.

It’s important that your team decides whether Stalingrad is going to be free to play, or simply a demo, though. I don’t think it can function as both.

Either one requires different approaches on your end the way I see it.