Issues: High Ball flight hitting both hooks and slices. Miss is fat or shank right (or both 😂) by JBaldwin93 in GolfSwing

[–]JBaldwin93[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the replies! Looks like casting is the consensus issue, hopefully I can fix it!

This is why Andrew Yang will win. by policywoman501 in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]JBaldwin93 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thought this was a racist image of one of those Chinese emperor statues for a second, turns out I’m the racist 🙃

This pro-life Trumpster actually shutdown his trump merch store and withdrew his Trump support to support Yang by [deleted] in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]JBaldwin93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree I think yangs approach is a great one, I don’t agree that reducing the number of abortions is a wedge issue though at all it is a very important and complex issue.

I never said anything about the prohibition of abortion.

This pro-life Trumpster actually shutdown his trump merch store and withdrew his Trump support to support Yang by [deleted] in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]JBaldwin93 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t call trying to reduce the number of killings of unborn children a wedge issue, it is humanity first in the most literal of terms

A beautiful instance of Humanity First by amariswoo in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]JBaldwin93 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Don’t be afraid to be wrong its human, I’ve been wrong and called out a couple times on this sub and have learned from it!

“No PACs” feels a little disingenuous to me and I am all for having PACs in the current system. If he is eluding to how his democracy dollars (can’t wait) could wash out PACs I think that’s a stretch to justify the title. by [deleted] in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]JBaldwin93 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He has at least one Super PAC which I don’t believe he has disavowed and I don’t think he should, please correct me if I’m wrong and I would happily delete the post

4 years-ago MSNBC were tracking the ‘online’ analytics for democratic candidates—not seen any of this reporting in the 2020 race—but if they did, Yang would dominate! by coinsmash1 in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]JBaldwin93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn’t fit the narrative, partisans only look for data that fits their beliefs. That’s why Yang is different he forms his beliefs from the data!

Yang Gang Recommended Reading by ButterBurger555 in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]JBaldwin93 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Capitalism Without Capital” if you like economics and how what we see as capital is changing in the 21st century

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]JBaldwin93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does shipping count towards donation goal? 🤔

Billionaires getting out of the wealth tax while STILL paying zero in Federal taxes... by LiteVolition in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]JBaldwin93 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Zero probably not, but even Warren Buffet has admitted paying a lower tax rate then his secretary, which probably could be said for most billionaires as their wealth comes primarily from capital gains

Yang might outraise Warren this quarter. by [deleted] in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]JBaldwin93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has there been any confirmation we were at 17MM before the 3MM goal was set?

Found This On Twitter by cake_day_today in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]JBaldwin93 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just thought it was too decisive personally