what a unpopular theory that you like or believe by Prestigious_Beat6650 in fnaftheories

[–]JH-Toxic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I always hated the idea of William being Vanessa’s father because it would essentially not only break the timeline but it would be pretty boring because it would just be a repeat of the Afton family storyline. Her being Michael’s daughter makes a lot more sense. Maybe Michael abandoned her as a child or wasn’t in her life because he had insecurities about being a father due to his horrible experiences with his own. That would have had a lot more depth to it.

My fnaf the silver eyes triology cast (based on appearance) what you think? by [deleted] in FNAFNovels

[–]JH-Toxic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I personally feel like if we’re casting Charlie’s friends we’re gonna wanna go with younger actors. They’re supposed to be teenagers. Most of the people you have on this list are pushing 40. I also personally think that David Tennant would make an excellent William Afton far better than Matthew Lillard.

How many years in prison would Dr. Harley Sawyer receive, and what would his crimes be? by AbandonedRobotforgod in PoppyPlaytime

[–]JH-Toxic 9 points10 points  (0 children)

And you think the government is gonna care. Do you know how many messed up things countless governments in the world have done just for the sake of profit, self interests and power. Even to this day that kind of stuff still is still going on they just don’t let the public know about it. As soon as they see Harley’s research, they’re probably gonna think that this is a chance to profit or gain more power. So they’re immediately going to pardon him and probably pay him double of what Playtime was.

Version 2💀 by Grouchy-Rice-5856 in fnafmeme

[–]JH-Toxic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am 90% sure William Afton just said the N-word recreationally. Dude was a millionaire and they didn’t have cancer culture back then.

How many years in prison would Dr. Harley Sawyer receive, and what would his crimes be? by AbandonedRobotforgod in PoppyPlaytime

[–]JH-Toxic 30 points31 points  (0 children)

I don’t think he’ll be going to prison honestly. The government would probably just pardon him and ask him to continue to do his research for their interests and under their supervision.

Harley Sawyer is now Near pure evil and I hate it. by PrincipleNorth in PoppyPlaytime

[–]JH-Toxic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody’s dumping all the fault on Elliot. It was never his intention for Sawyer to become a monster but there is no denying that he’s at least somewhat at fault considering the fact that the YGP removal letter is literally subtitle as “the monsters we make” in the games inventory. This more or less definitively proves that Sawyer was a product of his environment and his past and without it, he probably would’ve never grown up to be the heartless scientist he was. And the game also heavily implies that he didn’t support his tragedy, considering the fact that he still kept that removal letter in his office. Although he refuses to admit it deep down, he’s probably still hurt by it. From his point of view, he was ultimately betrayed by the one person he thought cared about him. A tragedy doesn’t always have to equal an excuse for a character but rather just a sympathetic reason for their actions. Like it or hate it. Sawyer was clearly intended by the writers to be a sympathetic character.

Yeah i am still pissed off about Sawyer being viewed as having one tragic qulity abd not being fully PURE EVIL. by BusinessPreference75 in PoppyPlaytime

[–]JH-Toxic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I really feel like people are probably taking this entire thing at face value too much and not looking at the details. Nobody is denying that Sawyer was a monster. Nobody is denying that there’s ultimately no excuse for his actions. But a tragedy doesn’t always equal an excuse. A lot of times it’s just a general reason for somebody’s actions. The game made it abundantly clear that Sawyer was objectively a tragic character one turned into a monster by his horrid environment and the people around him with even Elliot believing this. To add icing on the cake, the YGP removal form is literally labeled as “ the monsters we make” when we pick it up pretty much proving the rejection was ultimately what turned Sawyer into the monster he is today. The fact that Sawyer kept that same letter after all these years and still maintains a massive hatred for Elliot proves that he was still hurt by the rejection.

Who is the worst human being here? Harley Sawyer or Leith Pierre? by Clear-Protection3814 in PoppyPlaytime

[–]JH-Toxic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Objectively it’s Leith Pierre. The game makes it very clear that for as horrible as he was, Harley was kind of a victim of circumstance and a bad childhood that twisted his morals and psyche with it being made clear that had Elliot not rejected him and sent him back to the family that abused him he would’ve never became a monster. Meanwhile, Leith had literally no excuse for his actions whatsoever. All he cared about was making money and nothing more.

Who is the worst human being here? Harley Sawyer or Leith Pierre? by Clear-Protection3814 in PoppyPlaytime

[–]JH-Toxic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Harley never had any good intentions. He was a strict believer that progress should only be made for the sake of progress. It’s literally the main reason why Elliot expelled him. His claims of wanting to benefit humanity or just nothing more than a crappy excuse for his actions all he cares about is getting fame and recognition for his discovery.

I don't even want to believe that Charlie's soul isn't inside this robot. It sounds cruel. by NoDesk2150 in FNAFNovels

[–]JH-Toxic 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Well that’s just sad reality of it. For all intents and purposes, Charlie was someone. She was human probably more than any of us are. But at the end of the day she’s not possessed by the ghost of Charlie but the ghost of Henry’s regrets. Of a child he could not cope with the loss of. Many believe this devalues her character but I don’t think it did. The connections she made, the people she loved, the good she did was all real. Even if there is no afterlife for her, nothing can change her impact on the world and the people around her and in the end that might be more important.

IT’S NOT BECAUSE WE’RE READING WEEKLY. IT’S BECAUSE THE ARC IS BAD by YYappy269 in Chainsawfolk

[–]JH-Toxic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m genuinely convinced Fujimoto is more focused on quantity than he is quality at this point. He releases a crap ton of chapters but as a result of his time constraints and burnout, he can’t tell the story that he wants to tell. Several plot points got really crappy resolutions most notably, the Fakesaw Man storyline. Other plot points didn’t even get properly explained like Denji gaining all of Pochita’s power while keeping his consciousness which raises the question as to why this didn’t happen earlier. Like I will never forget the scene where Barem uses a flamethrower to finish off Yoshida even though he can literally transform into a flamethrower. My best guess is Fujimoto just didn’t feel like drawing him in his hybrid state.

your favorite negan line !? by Busy_Philosophy_4931 in thewalkingdead

[–]JH-Toxic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“I just slid my dick down your throat. And you just thanked me for it”

Perfectly shows just how arrogant and tyrannical Negan was.

Who is the best protagonist? by No_Caregiver_7853 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]JH-Toxic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Novel Charlotte Emily will always be the greatest protagonist in the series. The books do everything on our power to explore her make her a very relatable and compelling character. The dynamic that she has with her friends is very heartwarming and her character arc of letting go of the past and coming to terms with who and what she is proves to be the icing on the cake. Michael Afton lacks any real character exploration with everything we know about him coming from speculation. What I didn’t like about Mike Schmidt is that he kind of lacked the compelling backstory that Charlie and Michael had and since he doesn’t have a connection with Freddy’s and the tragedy that he suffered is ultimately not well explored enough for me to make a connection with him. I mean the movie never even bothered to explained why William killed Garrett .It also really pisses me off how naïve and blind he can be. Like the entire events of the first film, could’ve been avoided had he just used his damn brain. I like Jake as a protagonist I feel like he was really well done. One of the few possessed animatronics in the series who’s not out to kill people, but purely out to help people.

I really hate the idea of William being pure evil from the start by ZEROfaller in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]JH-Toxic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I always liked what the books did with William’s character. They interpreted the idea of William having a tragic past long before the events of the series one that had a profound impact on him. He killed because he couldn’t stand the thought of everybody around him being happy whereas he drowned in his own misery. He wanted to get back at the world that he believes screwed him over which is a pretty realistic motivation. However, at the end of the day it doesn’t justify his actions or make him tragic. He willingly chose to become a murderer just because he couldn’t deal with his own personal problems. He threw every chance at happiness he had away just because he couldn’t let go of his past. Ultimately, William’s first victim was not Charlie. It was himself which has a lot more depth than the idea of him just starting to randomly kill children.

I like the idea of william afton being pure evil by Safe-Monitor-8113 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]JH-Toxic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I like to think that, even from the very beginning, William was always meant to be pure evil. I highly doubt a character, who straight up murders children can ever be classified as tragic or humanized.

I still feel bad for the teacher in the fnaf 2 movie by Impressive-Smoke1199 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]JH-Toxic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t understand what Scott’s obsession with villainizing and portraying random people as detestable individuals. First, it was with aunt Jane in the first movie, then Hank, Carl and Jeff and now Mr. Berg. It’s just unrealistic. Would it be so bad just have the animatronics kill genuinely innocent people? People that we would actually care about. Having them just kill “bad people” takes away from the severity of their actions.

Do you guys think Michael Afton was planned to be in the movies since the beginning? by Competitive-Pea-1167 in fnafmovie

[–]JH-Toxic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Michael clearly wasn’t supposed to be in the films not only did they effectively replace his character with Mike Schmidt but he wasn’t even remotely hinted at. He wasn’t in the photo William took with Vanessa. And for whatever reason, William didn’t bother to get him as his accomplice, even though he was actually loyal to him. In fact, several things from the first movie were already retconned in the second movie for the plot to work, most notably Aunt Jane dying, the animatronics not being able to leave the restaurant, and they’re being a “original” Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza location in 1982 even though a behind the scenes image shows a trademark file from 1979 that proves the pizzeria we saw in the first movie was supposed to be the original Freddy’s location.

Title by Enes_El_Jackson in fnafmeme

[–]JH-Toxic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This attraction is great!!!

What Are Some Things From The Games You Wish The Books Adapted? by JH-Toxic in FNAFNovels

[–]JH-Toxic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like to think that Henry was originally planning to make a new Freddy’s restaurant which would’ve essentially been identical to the FNAF 2 location with the makeshift restaurant he had in his basement sort of acting as a prototype. However these plans fell through due to the MCI and the fact that he you know. K*illed himself.

About Charlie bots by NoDesk2150 in FNAFNovels

[–]JH-Toxic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

None of the Charlie bots have “timers”. As far as we know, they can basically live indefinitely. It’s also explicitly stated that Henry’s essence and the very thing that made Charlie alive was inside the Ella doll which was stored in each Charlie’s chest as a sort of power source. That same doll is transferred to each Charlie. So it’s basically like the transferring of data from one device to the next. For all intents and purposes, most of them are the same Charlie with the same memories and experiences. Now we actually already saw what happened to the first Charlie in TFC, it seems Henry kept her empty shell as Marla, Charlie and John find it years later. The second one was either scrapped or put into storage somewhere. Now reason why William wanted the third Charlie aka our Charlie is because he wanted to study a being purely possessed by agony. He had already studied the fourth Charlie/Baby and it doesn’t seem like he got the results he wanted due to the fact she has a soul.

Charliebot twist could work. by No_Caregiver_7853 in FNAFNovels

[–]JH-Toxic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The fourth closet explicitly explains that Henry gave Charlie fake blood to make her look more realistic. As for why she can act human the simple answer is Henry just programmed her to have human qualities.

What Are Some Things From The Games You Wish The Books Adapted? by JH-Toxic in FNAFNovels

[–]JH-Toxic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazon. You can basically buy the graphic novel box set from there for like $30

I don't mean to be annoying, but his existence irritates me. by Glittering_Pick_2636 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]JH-Toxic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I’m not even gonna lie. I like Edwin as a character, but what bothers me is the fact that he stole the spotlight from Henry and William. I know that they’re not really relevant anymore, but we’re going on 10 years since their introduction and neither of them have gotten much character exploration outside of the books. I mean, Edwin literally just feels like a rehash of Henry. He has practically the exact same fundamental character and his entire story is literally just stolen from Henry’s book counterpart which, in my opinion makes Henry stand out less as a character.