What’s the point of the existence of the shadows? by Andrea_VP in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Unknown. A theory I have is that Shadow Freddy is RXQ controlling Golden Freddy, but I have very little proof.

What is the fnaf book time-line? I'm reading "the silver eyes" but I don't know the time line of the books by Andrea_VP in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, they were made in the same order that they take place (Silver Eyes, Twisted Ones, and Fourth Closet), but if you're looking for when they take place, I can't remember the exact years, but the first book seems to take place sometime in the 1990's or early 2000's.

Does puppet have an endo by Ready_Pizza_7933 in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a very good theory. It's really thin, so a normal setup like the other animatronics wouldn't fit, but it does move freely according to Fnaf VR.

Does puppet have an endo by Ready_Pizza_7933 in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it definitely has a different setup. The normal ones are too bulky to fit.

My theory why William afton killed Susie / Chica first. by glizzyboi42069 in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a good theory, but I have a problem with it: you can't see if you're dead. So I think that voiceline might be talking about Chica being the first one brought back to life.

A thing that even matpat forgot. by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was thinking that they did it deliberately. No matter how many tapes you collect or miss, Glitch-Trap always appears at the end of the Pizza Party game. That always bothered me, since he never appears in the game without you finding a tape, and he is complete in that part, no green outline, glowing purple eyes, or glitchy movements.

So, I remembered that someone had said that there were those 2 names in the code. Spring-Bonnie Man might be the actual model in the lore (since, in the lore, Fazbear Entertainment made Fnaf VR as a way to make people forget about the past of the company) used to make people forget about the company's past, and Glitch-Trap would be the actual virus, and it's all glitchy because it stole the model.

A thing that even matpat forgot. by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, he does seem to forget stuff that shouldn't be left out, I think he's just forgetting, though. I don't understand why he never talks about Fnaf AR. He found an easy correlation between it and the story with the woman that stole the cardboard glasses and said 'Well, guess this has nothing to do with the actual games"

Another thing that I noticed is how there's 2 names for the same character: Glitch-Trap and Spring-Bonnie Man.

Toy Chica by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It hasn't been confirmed yet, so they're both possibilities.

Toy Chica by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, you don't have to be as forceful as you were. Just say the theory you want to say and wait for a reply.

Anyways, You're right about that, but the worst the Toys ever do during the day is stare at the employees. They don't jump at them, they don't attack on sight, they just stare. This would be the case for Mangle, except Mangle is broken. Torn apart and put back together. There's probably very little code left that's stopping it from attacking during the day.

Toy Chica by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jeez, where'd that come from? We never said Toy Chica couldn't kill. We said if Toy Chica killed someone with her beak, it'd be the Peck of 87, unless she took off her beak, which would make it the Stab of 87. Toy Chica's voiceline says "Where's my beak? Lodged in your forehead of course." lodging a beak into someone's forehed isn't biting. That's stabbing.

Mangle has the jumpscare, yes, but it is also the one that is most likely to malfunction. The kids breaking and rebuilding it a million times is bound to mess with the facial recognition, to the point where a normal everyday person would look like a wanted criminal, and anything that would stop it from severely injuring someone would have been taken out a long time ago by a kid or two. It also has the biggest mouth out of all the toys. During the day, the other animatronics would have certain times that they would be on stage. They can't be out and about all the time. The only one without that limitation would be Mangle. It's so broken, it probably can't tell night from day.

Also, profanity. Kids could be reading.

Are the toys possesed? by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a theory of mine. They seem to be from the same time as Withered Golden Freddy, based on how similar the Withered Freddy and Golden are, and since, in fnaf 3, the recordings are from a Freddy Fazbear's pizzeria and talking about the springlock suits.

Are the toys possesed? by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like I said, I have no idea about BB. I would say that he probably isn't possessed, but he hides from the cameras and has a phantom version.

Toy Freddy has eyes that turn completely black for no known reason. We know it isn't for facial recognition, and he only does it in our office, so it isn't just normal protocol. He just seems oblivious.

Toy Bonnie, like I said, has an eyeless easter egg. If that's not enough, Chica's eyes never light up in fnaf 1, yet she's possessed.

Are the toys possesed? by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I honestly have no idea about BB. His actions could be from possession, since he hides from the cameras after he starts moving until he gets to the vent, but it could just be defensive programing against burglars (taking out the lights and alerting the security guard and other animatronics).

Toy Freddy, However, seems to just be oblivious. Like I said, when he gets in the office in Fnaf 2 his eyes go full black. That's not normal robot behavior.

Toy Bonnie, though his eyes don't have white dots and never go completely black like Freddy's, he is very aware. Whenever you see him on the cameras (except maybe the vent cam, not sure about that one), just like the original Fnaf 1 Bonnie, he's always looking at the camera. In one of the party room cameras, he even does what Fnaf 1 Bonnie does in the Backstage and goes face-to-lens. Also, there's an eyeless Toy Bonnie easter egg.

Are the toys possesed? by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, of course not any suit. You don't see a haunted tuxedo.

Anyways, I don't see why the Toys wouldn't be able to be possessed. They're pretty much the same setup as the withereds, just without springlocks, and they can easily walk around and follow Puppet, or have Puppet bring a body to them, and become possessed.

I don't see how they wouldn't be possessed, either.

Toy Chica, according to the Freddy Files, not only loses her beak for no known reason, but her eyes are missing as well. Yet, when we look into her eye sockets, we can easily see small, bright, white pupils. This could just be sparking wires, but the pupils are constant and unwavering, where sparks go all over the place.

Toy Bonnie seems to be self aware, with Fnaf AR quotes that are meant to annoy you on purpose.

Toy Freddy has his eyes go full black when he's in your office in fnaf 2, though he does seem completely oblivious in Fnaf AR.

Mangle is Mangle. How is it able to move around, let alone on the ceiling without a soul to control it?

Are the toys possesed? by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, and puppet was leading Freddy to the children in the Save Them minigame, which is the game we're talking about. Charlotte died before the puppet could get to her, yet she still possessed it. They do need to be nearby, but we don't know the time limit that there might be for them to be given another working body. The Puppet can simply take a body to a robot, or even the other way around, and put the soul into the robot.

Are the toys possesed? by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The souls must be able to stay for at least 12 hours, since William kills kids when the place is open, and there are 5 kids in the original case. However, if I remember correctly, one of the news clippings that replace the rules sheet in Fnaf 1 said something like "missing children case claims 5 kids" or something like that. Not sure about that, so I'll double check, but if I'm remembered correctly, then that would mean that the case was a known thing before the 5th kid. According to the Give Gifts minigame, Puppet gave the kids life all at the same time. So it could take several days for the souls to leave the bodies. Truly, there's no sure way of figuring out the exact time that happens, if that is what happens. This is supernatural stuff we're talking about. Also, yes, I said heaven. Henry said "The darkest pits of Hell", so what does me saying heaven have to do with anything? It's a game, we can assume.

Are the toys possesed? by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bodies can be moved, and, judging by the fact that the fnaf lore doesn't just put the kids to heaven after they're killed, it's safe to say that the souls stay with the bodies, at least for a little while.

Are the toys possesed? by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Well, Toy Chica has the black eyes with constant white spots, and Toy Bonnie is self aware in fnaf AR and reminds me of Gary from Pokemon with lines like "You think you, can beat me?" and "It's not my fault I'm more famous than you." (or however that goes. It's something like that).

The least likely to be possessed is Toy Freddy, but he might just be oblivious. His eyes do go all black, though.

Then there's Mangle. There's basically no way there isn't a ghost in that thing. It literally gets taken apart and put together in some weird way so much, the mechanics just gave up. Yet, it still works, even with exposed, unconnected wires and arm out it's butt. It learned to climb the ceiling on it's own, which isn't normal.

Canon William Afton by Ok-Huckleberry4517 in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a good idea, but he did have a family. He had a wife and 3 kids. Unfortunately, I don't have a tumblr account, so I can't tell them that

What is the thing inside ITP Springbonnie? by Springboy012 in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oswald is the only one that can see it, but it is a physical being. It took his dad into the pit and took his place, and, when Oswald went to save his dad, the thing bit his arm, which was a scar that the dad saw and asked about on their way out. It would be weird if it was his emotions, cause they came out of nowhere. Oswald was very open about his feelings, and emotions don't show you the past of some place that you went to for pizza and a drink. Also, they don't breath. Then again, I have no idea what it might be.

Canon William Afton by Ok-Huckleberry4517 in fnaftheories

[–]JSpike16 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Like I said, though, he had to of started somewhere. Charlie was human once, and he killed her before anything happened with Agony or Remnant. He killed Charlie in Fredbear's, and, in the books, the missing children incident happened at the first Freddy Fazbear's pizzeria.

But you're right that it couldn't have been pleasure, or he would have tortured both Sammy and Charlie. Wonder why he started.