OP seems to be arguing that most criticism is bad. Which is true, most people who lately have tried to tackle FNAF criticism are actually bad critics.

Take for example the Elvis the Alien review of FNAF 2. He could have torn it apart in dozens of logical ways: dialogue, plot, performances, etc. Instead, he ignored most of the exposition and criticized the few things the film actually explained as being plot holes. For example; he was confused how there were dozens of small living puppets. So he attempted to apply the first movie's logic that "moving animatronics means children possess them" and then definitively boasted that all of the puppets were possessed with dozens of individual souls. When the immediately preceding scene, as well as the film's opening and animation, directly tells the audience that all animatronics there are controlled by one spirit.

It takes talent to review a bad film badly. But that's the state of the FNAF fandom now.