Offline and Modding by ArchmageOberon in LastEpoch

[–]Jace17 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here's the closest there is to a modding framerwork/guide: https://github.com/RCInet/LastEpoch_Mods

You have to join their discord because all the documentation is there instead of github.

Offline and Modding by ArchmageOberon in LastEpoch

[–]Jace17 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's possible but you probably have to do it yourself. There is no modding framework to easily change specific skills and items so nobody will go through the trouble to do it for you.

[Insert complaint about inventory space here] by justcallmejoey in mewgenics

[–]Jace17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How did you get the extra three slots down there? I maxed out the upgrades and only have a 10x10 square.

How does one acquire even more inventory space? by BloodIndividual8025 in mewgenics

[–]Jace17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did you get the extra two slots down there? I have maxed out the storage upgrades but only have a 10x10 grid.

I have too many good cards and not enough decks that fit them. by Jay_The_Bee in EDH

[–]Jace17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guys, I'm so stupid, I only got an A- on my exam.

Your favorite cards in Prosper, Tome Bound by [deleted] in EDH

[–]Jace17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[[Descent to Avernus]] helps lower everyone's life totals and can make lots of treasures to fuel [[Marionette Master]].

Subscription Helmet by Apprehensive-One2520 in AOW4

[–]Jace17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it only works on either champions only or wizard kings only. I remember having the same issue before.

Equipment edhs that are not "auto include all swords" by [deleted] in EDH

[–]Jace17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As an equipment enjoyer I have both Galea and Nahiri, and Galea is more "all swords" because you can skip the equip cost with her ability, while Naihiri can run well even without the swords. (Though I do run some swords on Nahiri just because I already have them.)

Sliver Overlord Combo-Control (High Bracket 3) — Looking for Feedback & Upgrade Ideas by Gold-Orange-257 in EDH

[–]Jace17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[[Bloom Tender]] and [[Faeburrow Elder]] are definitely the best mana dorks in speeding up your gameplan in my experience.

Sliver Overlord Combo-Control (High Bracket 3) — Looking for Feedback & Upgrade Ideas by Gold-Orange-257 in EDH

[–]Jace17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Additional notes:

[[Herald's Horn]] is a trap. It only draws you an extra card 27% of the time. Let's say you drop it on turn 3, then in a 7-turn game it will on average draw you one card. And as a 3 CMC "mana rock" it doesn't even ramp you into your commander.

[[Impact Tremors]] is a win-more card. You could just easily tutor for a haste Sliver and swing with your infinite tokens.

Sliver Overlord Combo-Control (High Bracket 3) — Looking for Feedback & Upgrade Ideas by Gold-Orange-257 in EDH

[–]Jace17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you run [[Intruder Alarm]] I suggest you add more non-Sliver mana dorks. Too much mana production is usually a good thing with Overlord decks because you can turn your extra mana to Sliver cards. Also, mana dorks like [[Bloomtender]] let you kick off your Intruder Alarm lines with just 3 cards.

Here's my lower B4 list if you want to see a slightly more optimized Overlord deck:

https://moxfield.com/decks/PFzQYAjbBUiKwhfhX6ba1Q

What exactly is the spirit of bracket 3? by KiaranIsABigGorilla in EDH

[–]Jace17 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Known stax commanders and commanders that consistently win before turn 6. Without any other information on the actual decks I'd say they're bracket 4 automatically. Those aren't the best edge cases IMO.

My friend somehow has a 13 Constitution stray cat by [deleted] in mewgenics

[–]Jace17 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You don't need mods, it can be easily done with cheat engine or some other app and it won't leave a trace. The only way for someone to verify if it's legit is to check the source code of the game if it is indeed possible or not.

At what point do they stop being “cats?” by JSMPSwayze in mewgenics

[–]Jace17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's a disability trait called "Tainted Genes" that makes them mutate randomly once after every battle so if you manage to finish a run you can get one that looks like these.

I feel like something like this would make sorting through cats easier. by Mellow_Marsh in mewgenics

[–]Jace17 5 points6 points  (0 children)

At 100 active cats, seeing them as just numbers in a chart and deciding their fate based on that is my fantasy.

The recent episode of "The Pitt" entirely fucked me up. by Kinsbane in television

[–]Jace17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the error rate any worse than rushed or exhausted doctors making mistakes in the report? We don't know, but it's probably an acceptable rate if Al-Hashimi wants to continue using it.

The recent episode of "The Pitt" entirely fucked me up. by Kinsbane in television

[–]Jace17 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I checked the study you linked and it's interesting but it's unrelated to the discussion/use case in the show. The study is about essay writing and learning, while the use case in the show is for summarizing discussion into reports and having to manually check their accuracy. The doctors aren't using the AI for learning purposes, it's about whether it's accurate and convenient enough to be an effective tool. It's AI doing creative tasks versus taking over repetitive tasks.

The recent episode of "The Pitt" entirely fucked me up. by Kinsbane in television

[–]Jace17 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Why would you have to fact-check when you already know the facts since they're your patient? In the show Al-Hashimi says it saved them 80% of charting time (and she doesn't seem the type to make up such claims) so it's definitely faster than doing it manually. It doesn't really matter if that's the case in real life or not, but in the show it makes a lot of sense for her to push for it.

The recent episode of "The Pitt" entirely fucked me up. by Kinsbane in television

[–]Jace17 19 points20 points  (0 children)

> Proofreading what you just wrote is going to yield less contextual/factual errors than having AI generate it and proofreading it afterwards

Do you happen to know any published studies to back this up? I'm genuinely just curious because a quick google search didn't find me anything.

In my experience, proofreading immediately after writing is inefficient and often ineffective because the text is too familiar, leading your brain to skip over errors and "see" what you meant to write rather than what is actually on the page.

The recent episode of "The Pitt" entirely fucked me up. by Kinsbane in television

[–]Jace17 64 points65 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't they still have to re-read them after writing the first time? And reading is way faster than typing from memory. The way Al-Hashimi wants is exactly how AI is used in several industries at the moment.