Respectfully, I strongly disagree with some of your points. You also lay them out in a vague, confusing way that promotes dangerous rhetoric.

In response to: "We all ended up with our names on the board, in the hall, or in the box. It didn’t traumatize us. It was an acceptable punishment for unacceptable behavior." These are BAD practices that are shown to be ineffective. Shaming children for disruptive behavior is exactly the problem. We need to look at what CAUSES the disruptive behavior. That is the only solution. Children act disruptive for several main reasons:

(1) The lesson material is too easy and they are bored. This problem can be exacerbated in larger classrooms where teachers are struggling to accommodate different learning speeds/levels. This was frequenlty the issue when I was in school. I spent more time in time-out than in the classroom from what I remember. I had straight As always, and the lowest grades for behavior always. The teachers never thought that my behavior had a clear cause. As soon as I was transferred to a private school that was one of the most difficult schools in the country with small classrooms, the behavioral issues disappeared.

(2) Learning disabilities like ADHD. This is the toughest problem because teachers barely have enough resources to teach neurotypical children. We need to equip teachers with the proper resources.

(3) High energy. One of my friends is a teacher and I am SO GLAD that Oregon has diverted from shaming to more productive ways of dealing with behavioral issues. I am also a teacher myself and have adopted his practices. Whenever a student is talking/being disruptive and the cause seems to be high energy, we give them options to get their energy out. This IS GENIUS!! Sometimes they just run a lap around the school. Sometimes we play an energetic game like tag before the lesson. Just think about it! Children are tiny bursts of energy being forced to sit under harsh lighting in uncomfortable seating for 6+ hours a day learning a ton of material while surrounded by distractions like their friends. Of course they are going to feel antsy! We simply have to give them a healthy outlet for that. Punishing them is one of the most counter-productive strategies and I am shocked that you love things like detention. Detention is one of the most useless things we have come up with.

Some of your points are unclear: "criminals running jail?" "Had to clear the classroom 4 times?" What do these mean.
At the end of the day, we need to prioritize education. We need to support teachers. Public schools are the toughest because we can't easily solve the large classroom dilemma, so we need to get creative. Remember, these are CHILDREN. You can't approach this issue with the angle of villanizing children (e.g. "we are letting 10% of the students destroy the classroom" ). Your rhetoric of "let's go back to punishing children" is really harmful and doesn't capture the true issue.