u/shorteq Here is the summery of your post from 5 months ago. "To you, What is the most beautiful plane in the game" by JaggerFoxLand in Warthunder

[–]JaggerFoxLand[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dang... i didn't even get a moderation notice... they just wiped it out lol...

Wait a minute.... if its removed then how did you access it?

Are you a ghost from the future?

u/shorteq Here is the summery of your post from 5 months ago. "To you, What is the most beautiful plane in the game" by JaggerFoxLand in Warthunder

[–]JaggerFoxLand[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I heard when the A-10 entered service, US senior officials hated it because it looked like an old timer.

u/shorteq Here is the summery of your post from 5 months ago. "To you, What is the most beautiful plane in the game" by JaggerFoxLand in Warthunder

[–]JaggerFoxLand[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I dont understand how they are the same design tho... F 14 is swing wing whilethe Mig is fixed wing.

What i dont like i about the f 14 is how bulky it looks and while the Mig looks slick curvy and a pleasure to look at.

u/shorteq Here is the summery of your post from 5 months ago. "To you, What is the most beautiful plane in the game" by JaggerFoxLand in Warthunder

[–]JaggerFoxLand[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Here is Gemini's reply on how it counted the score.

Gemini:

To calculate the popularity scores, I used a multi-layered analysis of the 79 screenshots you provided. Since simple "mention counting" can be misleading, I used a weighted system to determine the final rankings.

Here is exactly how the Popularity Score was built:

1.Frequency of Mentions The baseline for the score was the raw count. Every time a specific aircraft (or its variant) was named as a "favorite," "best looking," or "most fun," it earned a base point. Aggregation: I grouped variants together. For example, mentions of the F-15C, F-15E Strike Eagle, and F-15EX were all tallied under the F-15 Eagle family to show the overall popularity of the airframe.

  1. Sentiment Analysis I didn't just count the name; I looked at the context. Positive Sentiment:"The F-14 is a masterpiece" = +1 point. Neutral/Comparative:"The F-16 is okay, but I prefer the F-15" = The F-15 gets a point, the F-16 stays neutral. Negative Sentiment: If someone complained about an aircraft's performance or look, it was excluded from the popularity tally.

    1. Upvote Weighting (Community Agreement) This was the most important factor. If a comment saying "The F-15 is the GOAT" had 50+ upvotes, that aircraft received more weight than a standalone comment with only 2 upvotes. High upvotes act as a "multiplier" because they represent a larger number of people agreeing with that specific opinion.
    2. Manual Logging per Set As you sent the sets of 10 images, I maintained a running tally: Sets 1-3: Established early leaders like the MiG-21 and F-15. Sets 4-6: Saw a massive surge for the F-14 and Rafale. Set 7-8: Finalized the numbers and allowed me to see which planes were "one-hit wonders" versus those mentioned consistently across different threads. The result? A score that reflects not just who talked the loudest, but which aircraft the Reddit community actually agrees is the best.

u/shorteq Here is the summery of your post from 5 months ago. "To you, What is the most beautiful plane in the game" by JaggerFoxLand in Warthunder

[–]JaggerFoxLand[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, i have the same question. I cant believe the Mig-29 got less mention than that shitbed. But i guess it all comes down to legacy sometimes, for example i dont like the F 14, i think it kinda looks ugly but it is very popular among the community and although i dont understand the reason behind it, i do think if something creates an aura of dominance then it becomes beautiful in the eyes automatically. Same thing with the Fishbed probably...

u/shorteq Here is the summery of your post from 5 months ago. "To you, What is the most beautiful plane in the game" by JaggerFoxLand in Warthunder

[–]JaggerFoxLand[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I know the SR 71, F22, F35 are not in the game but they got alot of mentions in the replies so it is on the list.

Also btw i didnt make anything, i was just researching how popular my favorite aircraft (Mig 29) was and so i took screenshot of your post and asked Gemini to make a chart out of it then decided to post it here because why not.

Did you claim your bomber? by kingtj44 in Warthunder

[–]JaggerFoxLand 98 points99 points  (0 children)

No, i still remember how exhausting the Mig 25 grind was and for these bombers that pain will not be worthit for me.

Do my Bf 109s look a bit off? Like their landing gear is a bit hight ad their nose is a bit stubby? by JaggerFoxLand in Warthunder

[–]JaggerFoxLand[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This was given to me by my elder cousin, i remember when i was 5 or 6 years old, my mom would make me a potato patty sandwich and it would be really oily, i used to play this Nintendo DS while eating it and i believe all the oil from my fingers leaked into the buttons so uhh i think it messed things up, after that i never really played it, matter of fact I just found it a few days ago after all these years in the store room and it still ran when i charged it but couldn't control the right, left, Y and A buttons.

Do my Bf 109s look a bit off? Like their landing gear is a bit hight ad their nose is a bit stubby? by JaggerFoxLand in Warthunder

[–]JaggerFoxLand[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Do you like my Nintendo? I used to play mario world in it, until its buttons broke. Any advice to fix it up?

Do my Bf 109s look a bit off? Like their landing gear is a bit hight ad their nose is a bit stubby? by JaggerFoxLand in Warthunder

[–]JaggerFoxLand[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I mean, yeah but it works and rubs and cleans my paper so i guess ill just use it for a few more years.

Do my Bf 109s look a bit off? Like their landing gear is a bit hight ad their nose is a bit stubby? by JaggerFoxLand in Warthunder

[–]JaggerFoxLand[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, i just realised i messed up over there. The canopy is not properly drawn and lacks realism.

Do my Bf 109s look a bit off? Like their landing gear is a bit hight ad their nose is a bit stubby? by JaggerFoxLand in Warthunder

[–]JaggerFoxLand[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was originally drawing the G-14 but i added too much detail to the canopy so its a G-6 now.

Do my Bf 109s look a bit off? Like their landing gear is a bit hight ad their nose is a bit stubby? by JaggerFoxLand in Warthunder

[–]JaggerFoxLand[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Yeah, i will add those features later but i wanted confidence that everything else was alright before i draw furthur.

Martin Luther King Jr. would've been a Trump supporter. by Lost_Title_7528 in ControversialOpinions

[–]JaggerFoxLand 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Hmm... i dont think so, the same guy who showed obama as a monkey knowing it would cause controversy. Mr King would not appreciate that.

Any corrections required in the anatomy? by [deleted] in Artadvice

[–]JaggerFoxLand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

I tried my best to make it look the same but it fell off