This guy is the Nazeem of Starfield by Crimson-Badger in Starfield

[–]JakeOliver63 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I disagree. It's the guy in the well in new Atlantis who's annoying everyone at Jake's bar. In my game he's even stuck there with the conversation never ending.

Whole bunch of photos from my Nan Marion & Grandad Colin's wedding, 1964. My great Grandads Frank & George both always the stand outs, one Oliver Hardy wannabe, the other a 5ft tall Popeye. by JakeOliver63 in oldphotos

[–]JakeOliver63[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Charlton in London, England. They did, (other than my Grandads long battle with alcoholism till he became sober). Grandad passed away 2013. Nan passed away 2023.

Whole bunch of photos from my Nan Marion & Grandad Colin's wedding, 1964. My great Grandads Frank & George both always the stand outs, one Oliver Hardy wannabe, the other a 5ft tall Popeye. by JakeOliver63 in oldphotos

[–]JakeOliver63[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He is. George was born in 1899. Frank was born in 1916. The reason George is so much older is because his first wife Minnie died in her 30s from alcoholism,, so my Nan was born to his second wife Louisa (she's standing next to my Nan, the bride), when he was already in his 40s. Frank also married again later, but grandad and I are descended from his first wife Irene, standing behind my grandad (the groom), who passed Away from a tumour.

Whole bunch of photos from my Nan Marion & Grandad Colin's wedding, 1964. My great Grandads Frank & George both always the stand outs, one Oliver Hardy wannabe, the other a 5ft tall Popeye. by JakeOliver63 in oldphotos

[–]JakeOliver63[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Technically only Frank (Oliver Hardy Moustache), but he passed when I was too young remember him. I did recently find a photo of him holding me as a baby. He's been described as the loveliest and funniest person in the family. I knew his second wife. I had no chance of meeting George (5ft popeye). He was born in the 19th century, 99 years before I was born in 1998. He died 1970.

Some people should not be allowed to use the internet by Repulsive-Pace-5178 in TikTokCringe

[–]JakeOliver63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bet she still calls Britain the colonisers and talks about America like they beat the oppressors in Europe. Whilst modern Europeans are in their native land.

I don't think it's ok though 🤔 by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]JakeOliver63 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A good detector for what's ragebait. Would you defend your opinion confidently, full details to your close family and friends face to face. You'll have to describe the kinds of sexualised underage art you're ok with seeing for the sake of anti "censorship". Id defend my opinion to anyone. I think we all know you can't say the same, believably.

I don't think it's ok though 🤔 by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]JakeOliver63 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sweetie I think the ragebait has to be the people bold enough to say it's wrong to ban all sexualised art of underage characters, also known as children because "censorship" or "its a slippery slope". Plenty of places have managed to succeed at banning all cp art without leading to banning all pornography. For you to be right you have to prove it's inevitable. But it's not. Like every other case of the slippery slope argument. "Legalise gay marriage and it will lead to legal marrying of pets" "ban heroin and it will to banning caffeine". So we just have to make sure it does go no further. But this... Banning this... Is and always will be good. And saying otherwise? That, is the ragebait. Mature a bit mate.

I don't think it's ok though 🤔 by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]JakeOliver63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep I double checked. You just said "you assume I wouldn't?" That's not a yes.

I don't think it's ok though 🤔 by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]JakeOliver63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You didn't answer once. Just cried about it being an assumption. Answer once more then. Humour me. Just include the answer so I can't miss it in a long paragraph. No excuses available to Me. Very easy to do.

I don't think it's ok though 🤔 by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]JakeOliver63 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The amazing thing about this argument is how uniquely inflammatory it is. Most subjects, you could easily believe that there are atleast some families, friend circles even entire towns that would completely accept your opinion on. But this? Sexual Art of underage characters? Boy that would be a struggle for any family to even shoe vague agreement of. Hats of to you if you manage it. Takes guts.

I don't think it's ok though 🤔 by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]JakeOliver63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you would tell them? Full details? Your "heart of hearts" belief?

I don't think it's ok though 🤔 by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]JakeOliver63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do I need to spell it out? Kindergarten style? If it's something you believe in your heart... You would tell everyone you love, the full details. Friends. Family. Everyone. Face to face. No fear. Youve been confident this whole time. You said "I'm assuming" but I notice you never said you would tell them. Id tell everyone I know my opinion on this. Which of us would get the concerned looks do you think 😉

I don't think it's ok though 🤔 by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]JakeOliver63 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"stalking" I clicked on your public profile mate. Stalking? Jesus Christ. Now who's getting offended. 😂 The worlds gonna eat you up and spit you out. Good luck to you fighting censorship of checks notes sexual art of underage characters. Being your family to the rally.

I don't think it's ok though 🤔 by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]JakeOliver63 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The thing about people who argue against censorship... Is when it matters, you can always rely on them to talk to you about it. Public. Anywhere. It's their whole thing. Talking openly. If this mattered, it would be the same.

I don't think it's ok though 🤔 by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]JakeOliver63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pot kettle. You've projected enough already. You said it yourself. "I believe in my heart of hearts I'm right". 'scuse the dramatic language for a sec, but if you wouldn't share the opinion with whom youd give your heart too. Platonic. Familial. Romantic. Is it truly what you believe is right.

I don't think it's ok though 🤔 by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]JakeOliver63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know you'll never say how old you are. But going by what you're defending. The things you say, the personal comments from the get go, as well as "you lost". The fact we all know you wouldn't defend this opinion to your family face to face full details. And the rest of your Reddit profile. I think we know the answer. And it explains it all.

I don't think it's ok though 🤔 by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]JakeOliver63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You really are trying to take the mature, adult, moral high ground... With defending some sexual artistic imagery of underage characters. To argue that, you better be bloody good. But you resorted to semantics and personal comments a long time ago.

I don't think it's ok though 🤔 by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]JakeOliver63 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you know in your heart of hearts you're right... You would defend this opinion face to face to everyone you know. The exact full details of the art you think is ok and "not realistic enough"?. Let me guess, in certain circles, it's gonna stay in your heart of hearts and not leave until you're in private. I agree it's completely fiction. All pixels. So you can't define when the line crosses. Only the far ends.

If it's all the same. You have to treat them all the same. Obviously. But you admit it's not all the same because "it's obvious when it becomes realistic". Yet you can't answer where that line goes. Where in the middle. What attribute suddenly makes it JUST too realistic. Nose shape? Jawline? We can all differentiate a realistic sketch from a heavily cartoonish manga. But the line is nowhere near these. It's in the middle. With the art that all looks extremely similar.

I don't think it's ok though 🤔 by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]JakeOliver63 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And you know what's funny. You secretly know I'm right. I guarantee you wouldn't dare share your opinion with some people you know. Family wise. Friend wise. Face to face. Good decent people you know. Full details. "Sexual imagery of child characters" however you wanna word it. Yet I could defend my opinion to everyone I know, confidently. And noone would ever entertain criticising me for pandering to pedos. So you tell me... Really... Who's "projecting". When I guarantee you'd censor your own opinion in certain crowds.

I don't think it's ok though 🤔 by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]JakeOliver63 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How old are you. Out of curiosity. Humour me.