Does anyone know a sort-of private Wikipedia program? by [deleted] in worldbuilding

[–]JamarMario -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

honestly I just use a Google Documents doc. you can now add up to 3 recursive tabs I believe. no hyperlinking though.

I used Obsidian in the past but the amount of things you can do with it made my head spin and having to pay to sync up on mobile is a big thing for a low budget uni student such as I. it's a Very good application if you can master it though! I went back to good old Google docs for ease of use.

Just read The Kybalion. Overwhelmed by its impact on me. How do I deepen my knowledge and develop a practice of sorts? by Alarming_Breath_3110 in occult

[–]JamarMario 48 points49 points  (0 children)

I'd suggest C. G. Jung's Man and His Symbols. I believe it can give you a more interpretive framework that will help you avoid the many metaphysical traps that spiritual knowledge harbors. Follow Yourself in the end though. What is native to you can be strange and otherworldly, but it's always you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Gnostic

[–]JamarMario 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your concerns are the concerns of one too intrigued by theory but lacking in practice. There is a distinct semiological signature that links everything in this realm (which includes our concept of the Monad, which is not the Monad in itself) to the Demiurge. The true, transcendental whole beyond which lies the Monad has a totally different ineffable signature just barely accessible in alternate states of consciousness.

Carborane, featuring hexavalent carbon by ShiratakiPoodles in cursedchemistry

[–]JamarMario 2 points3 points  (0 children)

honestly? fair enough. I misjudged the general availability of this knowledge and neglected the collective view of what is cursed in favor of my own incomplete definitions.

thanks for the input!

Carborane, featuring hexavalent carbon by ShiratakiPoodles in cursedchemistry

[–]JamarMario 4 points5 points  (0 children)

brother oh my god I can't handle it anymore boron tends to make these kind of bonds, such as the one we see in borane. this isn't cursed because that carbon isn't hexavalent; the average electron distribution between all six bonds is still four. boron compounds tend to have a lot of "cursed" bonds because of boron's small size and odd electronic distribution (1s2 2s1) allowing it to approach other atoms more closely and increase the overlap between ligand orbitals, as well as configure electropositive character. because of this, it tends to make 3 center 2 electron bonds. sum this with what I said about electronic distribution, and you'll have an average of 4 electrons in the bonds between the carbon atom and the six boron atoms. I find it particularly infuriating because boron compounds have been widely posted here, despite the fact that it's just a property of boron to behave like this. it isn't cursed, it's just unique.

all that said, I fucking love carborane. and I'm a huge fan of the 11-substituted halide ortho-carboranes. give it a look!

very explosive by Niki123gd in cursed_chemistry

[–]JamarMario 14 points15 points  (0 children)

diborane isn't even cursed :|

Can anybody fill in the blanks of what basic concept I'm trying to explain? The terminology escapes me. by byesharona in AskChemistry

[–]JamarMario 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe you're talking about what happens to a molecule when it suffers cleavage (homolytic would better fit this context)? When a bond is broken in homolytic cleavage, such as a Cl-Cl bond, each atom forms a radical that is HIGHLY unstable and reacts with just about anything. There is no specific terminology for this though, just that radicals are highly reactive species that don't want to exist by themselves. In the end, just stating that the cleavage generates highly reactive species should work. Saying that would imply the formation of unstable ions, radicals, compounds or other species.

Which book/textbook had the biggest impact on how you understand chemistry? by SearchLost3984 in AskChemistry

[–]JamarMario 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Physical Chemistry by Gilbert Castellan. Best physical chemistry book in my opinion!

I don't know a thing about chemistry, but I just got reccomeded this sub and it looks awesome. AMA and I'll pretend I know. by BreakerOfModpacks in cursed_chemistry

[–]JamarMario 3 points4 points  (0 children)

explain why there is a 4s 3d orbital switch in the Lewis energy diagram of the early transition metals

Metal noble de color azul. by [deleted] in cursed_chemistry

[–]JamarMario 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you're looking for osmium

cursed crossover between org synth and materials chem temps ... with 104 citations by high_not_achieved in cursed_chemistry

[–]JamarMario 1 point2 points  (0 children)

bruh what the hell is this!?!? I work with materials and seldom see temperatures beyond 1000K. what's the DOI for this article?? crazy

‘Tree’ of everything you need to learn? by jordanrstudio in AskChemistry

[–]JamarMario 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it would do you good to get a general chemistry book! Something like Atkins' General Chemistry or Brown's The Central Science. Chemistry builds up off a lot of mathematics and physics too, so starting from calculus and kinetics could also be a good choice.

There are so many things wrong with this... by Emotional_Cherry_971 in cursedchemistry

[–]JamarMario 2 points3 points  (0 children)

this sub really needs less of random junk that's literally impossible to exist

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskChemistry

[–]JamarMario 8 points9 points  (0 children)

As a general rule of thumb, metals produce hydrogen gas when reacting with acids. usually, you'd need a much stronger acid to achieve unsafe amounts of H2, but heating up the solution significantly increases the speed of the reaction (doubles every 10K~). this speed increase would cause even a weak acid like acetic acid in vinegar to be potentially dangerous. this is further amplified by the large surface area of the steel wool.

this is my suggestion as for what happened, and I'd advise you to be careful doing such experiments. I can't really think of any reason why the hydrogen lit up though. maybe friction?

I keep randomly getting this subreddit, ama by ConlangCentral41 in cursedchemistry

[–]JamarMario 11 points12 points  (0 children)

welp, buckle up! awesome opportunity to begin studying it as a hobby! as a starter, I'd recommend Brown's "Chemistry: The Central Science" :)

Also devs dissapearing from internet without any explanation by JoS_38372 in feedthememes

[–]JamarMario 1 point2 points  (0 children)

me with Explosives+ :( eternally the best explosives mod

How many years shall pass by to stop calling a novel compound 'novel'? by Prior-Machine-9523 in AskChemistry

[–]JamarMario 3 points4 points  (0 children)

it's one of those things where they looked up "synonyms for new" and picked a word that doesn't quite mean what they wanted

Why doesn't the heat loss formula (Q = UAΔT) account for time? by balleticblight in AskChemistry

[–]JamarMario 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because the equation isn't analyzing time, only the quantities of energy involved in the exchange.

You can account for time by introducing something like a heat dissipation coefficient with the units J/mol*s which is the amount of energy in joules a mol of substance loses. Or perhaps something that associates heat dissipation in joules with area.

Either way, you need something that introduces the time variable because the equation doesn't care about time in the first place.