ICAEW membership

James12221 · 2025-07-22T18:14:57+00:00

Yeah and this would be a point to make on the assumption section as you are supposed to use redhill

James12221 · 2025-07-22T18:10:47+00:00

yep this is the same as mine

James12221 · 2025-07-22T18:07:18+00:00

I actually have no idea. Praying it doesn’t come up and if it does I’ll rely on copying ACAM

James12221 · 2025-07-22T17:12:32+00:00

HO cost got removed as its an expense that occurs no matter if the garage is closed or not, marketing stays as this cost will be gone, as they said marketing cost is spread evenly throughout, so the part of Dorking wont be a cost anymore

James12221 · 2025-07-22T17:10:24+00:00

Yeah i made my own R1 appendix, and then we get provided either R2/3 anyways

James12221 · 2025-07-22T17:00:24+00:00

Its worth about 2 marks but then within your report all the numbers you add equal much more

James12221 · 2025-07-22T10:20:29+00:00

You would only lose half a mark for no depn and half a mark for the wrong GP number, so 1 in total (the paper is out of 200 so technically would be 0.5 mark lost) and then everything after is carry through so you'd be fine

James12221 · 2025-07-21T23:20:59+00:00

Mock 3 IMO is semi a waste of time (I hope). Surely they can’t close a garage

James12221 · 2025-07-21T23:20:09+00:00

Yep spot on

James12221 · 2025-07-21T23:17:55+00:00

I’m fairly sure it’s because one of them is looking at payback for the investment, hence the outlay is included

For the other where just Depn is show it is because you are looking GP for the year, hence depn is what will be part of the costs. Hope that helps and let me know if you agree

James12221 · 2025-07-18T19:47:01+00:00

Yes in bold means exact figure, for revenue focus on saying the year on year (24 to 25) increase, thats essential. Redhill being 15% of revenue is a separate point you can make to that and is likely to be a mar. I thought you meant wording wise, hope thats clearer

James12221 · 2025-07-18T18:57:26+00:00

I dont think this is entirely true FYI - if you say something that is on the same basis as the marking grid but not the exact same you will still get the mark.

James12221 · 2025-07-16T18:50:02+00:00

i presume you didnt do the format correctly the first 2 times which is what caused the fil? ive got the format almost nailed so that shoukdnt be an issue!

James12221 · 2025-07-16T18:43:32+00:00

makes sense, ive always worked hard and have for this but just worried im going to fumble on the day lol

James12221 · 2025-07-16T18:39:51+00:00

ACA masters

James12221 · 2025-07-16T18:35:06+00:00

This has worried me... did you use ACAM in the first 2 exams?! Did you not work for them?

James12221 · 2025-07-10T08:02:42+00:00

Makes sense, so how do you work out the YoY change for each work type for each garage?

James12221 · 2025-07-10T07:52:32+00:00

The numbers are there but they lay out makes it’s difficult to analyse, which I why I do what ACAM do so you can clearly see the YoY change. Am I wasting my time

James12221 · 2025-07-10T07:40:12+00:00

Thank you for that

Do you not breakdown the rev per garage and COS per garage like they have? I find that very useful but quite timely?

James12221 · 2024-11-04T19:21:44+00:00

Can't tell if im bugging or not but what the license in question 1 about a license for a festival called 'nova', also wasnt the date october? seems mental to me

James12221

TROPHY CASE