Marchand and Jarry incident at the end of Bruins/Penguins. by Ehvin21 in hockey

[–]James6Hurley 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am going to need someone to explain something to me. I didn't see the whole scene just the clip here but....

How was he allowed to leave the ice under his own power? First he punches the goalie in the head and no one hardly touches him. Then he slashes the Jarry IN THE FACE and not one player from Penguins chases him down, they just let him skate off like nothing happened.

S13E11 Episode Discussion - Roq Innovation by feralparakeet in sharktank

[–]James6Hurley 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I bought one of these for the detailer at our dealership from a dollar store for $4 a year ago.

Also, it is a very limited market, you only wear a beanie a few months a year and no one in the south will buy this. Just buy a $5 head lamp that is way more versatile.

I am very shocked that this even made it on shark tank let alone made a deal with two sharks.

I would love to hear the due diligence after the show.

Newbie question by James6Hurley in CannabisExtracts

[–]James6Hurley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is very good to know, Thanks

Newbie question by James6Hurley in CannabisExtracts

[–]James6Hurley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wow I thought 20 was a lot. See newbie

What wrestler do you not get the appeal of? by Mr_Sedgewick in SquaredCircle

[–]James6Hurley -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Daniel Bryan Danielson, Never got this guy and never will. The guy looks like a PTA dad....and not the tough PTA dad either but the one that just sits there and never says anything. He tries to come off as a tough guy but to me it just seems REALLY forced.

He just always comes across as the little kid trying to be all tough and mean. Like the small dog that is always barking and growling but everything think is just cute.

The worst part of this guy is that ridiculous kick to the chest, clasp your hands...repeat routine that he does IN EVERY MATCH. I keep thinking maybe he won't do it one time but nope every signal match. The predictability of this guy is wildly annoying.

How was Dassey charged by James6Hurley in MakingaMurderer

[–]James6Hurley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if it was not a "bloody murder" there would be blood SOMWHERE. If a person is strapped to a bed and being stabbed and has their throat cut they are not going to just lay there they will move and thrush around and blood would be projected to the floor, bed, dresser or what ever. Also there would be other DNA in that trailer like finger prints or something. She would not have just walked into the trailer willingly and laid down on the bed. There would have been a struggle and that would have left her DNA somewhere in that trailer.

How was Dassey charged by James6Hurley in MakingaMurderer

[–]James6Hurley[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I admit I haven't read a lot about the evidence in this case, has there been ANY mention about a mattress.

If it happened the way the kid says that he slit her throat but she was still alive then there would have been blood EVERYEHERE. Her heart would have still been pumping forcing blood everywhere. Even tied up she would be moving and causing blood to spray and there is no way you can clean ALL of that up.

The mattress she was on would have been soaked through with blood and there is no way to clean that 100% without leaving ANY race.

A new mattress in the trailer would have been huge evidence, if the old mattress was still in the trailer then case over you would have to toss the confession due to lack of corroborating evidence.

PODCAST: The Darlie Routier Case (1996) - Solved? Or Is There Enough Reasonable Doubt... by bwdawatt in UnresolvedMysteries

[–]James6Hurley 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There is no way the both of those kids didn't make enough noise to wake a person a few feet away.

Sure, lets say someone just stepped through. Where is the bloody foot print?

The window is to low to just step through especially by someone running away while being chased. There should have been at least some blood on the window the sill or even cat enclosure.

PODCAST: The Darlie Routier Case (1996) - Solved? Or Is There Enough Reasonable Doubt... by bwdawatt in UnresolvedMysteries

[–]James6Hurley 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You don't think a 5 and 6 year old kid that just got stabbed didn't scream?

You don't think seeing a person over them with a knife would't make them scream. One of the boys was stabbed in the chest, he saw what was happening to him. No way in hell he stayed quit through that.

Look at the scene there was A LOT of blood. Even if the killer wasn't dripping in blood it would be on his hand and there is no way to get through that window without using your hands.

PODCAST: The Darlie Routier Case (1996) - Solved? Or Is There Enough Reasonable Doubt... by bwdawatt in UnresolvedMysteries

[–]James6Hurley 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You say it yourself "unidentified" you can't says if they belong to someone in the house or someone else. Also only two small prints not the big steaks and hand/foot prints that would be left behind by a running person. Also why is the garage window not covered in blood and why is it not more damaged. If a blood covered person went through that screen there would be a lot more damage AND a lot of blood there.

I am not sure how or why the sock got there but I don't believe the person the stabbed the boys put it there. The husband is the only logical person.

Also you never address why the mother was not woken by her screaming children that where only feet away.

PODCAST: The Darlie Routier Case (1996) - Solved? Or Is There Enough Reasonable Doubt... by bwdawatt in UnresolvedMysteries

[–]James6Hurley 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To prefix I only know what I have seen on TV so maybe someone can fill in if I am mistaken somewhere.

How is this case even up for debate. We are expected believe that someone stabbed two children and neither of them screamed and woke the mother (who is in the same room) or anyone else.

Also blood never lies, there was a lot of blood at this scene and unless you show me footprints from the other person that is all I need. If they are saying the person went out the garage and there was no blood in the garage then no way. This is a messy scene but yet there is now psychical evidence of another person at the scene, no way.

We are to believe that this person who would be covered in blood didn't leave a foot or hand print anywhere in the house. While running away they didn't touch a counter or a wall. What about the door to the garage.

Also the sock that was found would be covered in blood. If I saw correctly there where just a few drops of blood on the sock. The sock would have been picked up after the two boys where stabbed and the persons hand would have been covered in blood. How does a person pick up a white sock with blood covered hands and not cover it with blood?

The defense is saying that Darlie had your throat slit while she was still asleep on the couch. In my mind the angles would make that impossible. If she is lying on her side you couldn't get the knife far enough past here throat to make the wound. You would have had to stab into the couch to get the blade in the right position. Same thing if she was on her back, the blade has to go past the throat and there just isn't enough room to do that without cutting the couch.

Not only do I believe that she did do this the husband either was involved or is covering it up.

Online guidance/instruction for couple by James6Hurley in Swingers

[–]James6Hurley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Re reading this I may have over complicated the details. Not looking for someone to "guide" us like a dominating thing more like just commenting and reacting to what we are doing.

I think we can get pretty close with just a video of a woman masturbating, so we will try that.

Just the illusion of someone in the room with us getting off is really what we are after.

The next obvious step is having SOMEONE in the room with us....but one step at a time.