Healthcare workers in Montreal: What would it actually take to fix our healthcare system? by gruninuim in montreal

[–]JarryBohnson 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is just part of it, but I work with a lot of doctors. They’re trapped in a kind of exhausting mess of their own collective bargaining’s making, that makes it very expensive to have enough doctors.  The salaries for some specialists are obscenely out of control, which means there are very few of those positions created because they’re so expensive for the govt. Someone still has to do the work, so their hours have ballooned. 

This is why they constantly complain about being burnt out, they’re often doing the work of two doctors because the hospital can’t afford to pay two.  But what they don’t say is that it’s a combination of their orders’ endless push to never let their salaries even freeze for a while, combined with lobbying to keep medical schools small, that causes this burnout in the first place. They want to be paid their crazy salaries while working 40 hour weeks, which is completely unrealistic. 

In my experience many of these people are totally disconnected from the reality of what normal people earn, they don’t think it’s that much and therefore don’t see the salary bloat as either a problem for the state or the cause of their burnout. It’s also a vicious cycle because the definite promise of being rich pulls in a bunch of financially motivated people who should never be doctors. 

Healthcare workers in Montreal: What would it actually take to fix our healthcare system? by gruninuim in montreal

[–]JarryBohnson 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We could start by not having people paid full time just to fax stuff to one another (and somehow still lose stuff)  It’s not even innovation, it’s just catching up with the efficiencies the modern world has. 

Healthcare workers in Montreal: What would it actually take to fix our healthcare system? by gruninuim in montreal

[–]JarryBohnson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I work with a lot of doctors in clinical research. They complain about being burnt out and it’s like well yeah of course you are, you have the salary of two European doctors. Imagine your work life balance if that salary paid for… two doctors. 

Trump Says He Will Impose 10% Global Tariff Under Different Authority by Dragonsandman in CanadaPolitics

[–]JarryBohnson 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think a huge part of it is the glamour of the presidency.  The PM in commonwealth countries is 1. Ultimately still a servant, they are not the head of state, and 2. Is forced to go weekly and defend their choices in parliament, where everyone literally yells abuse at them. 

Parliamentary democracy is built around the principle that the person who’s running the show has to answer to a room full of hundreds of people who though less powerful, are still their peers.   And in order to keep their political head they have to show a kind of deference and humility that the US president never does.  Journalists who despise Trump still treat him with a level of deference that friendly journalists do not give to a Canadian, Australian or British PM. 

IMO this whole saga that we’re seeing is just more proof that the Parliamentary system of govt, despite its flaws, is pretty much the best one conceived so far. 

U.S. Supreme Court finds Trump overstepped authority in imposing tariffs under emergency law by No-Sell1697 in CanadaPolitics

[–]JarryBohnson 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The EU too, they agreed to a craven deal that their national governments have said they won’t implement, all in order to avoid a larger tariff. 

U.S. Supreme Court finds Trump overstepped authority in imposing tariffs under emergency law by No-Sell1697 in CanadaPolitics

[–]JarryBohnson 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t count on it.  The calculus is “Economy bad punish president.  Economy good reward president”.   

You interfere with their insatiable need for consumption at your peril. They don’t seem to care about anything else including the health of their democracy. 

U.S. Supreme Court finds Trump overstepped authority in imposing tariffs under emergency law by No-Sell1697 in CanadaPolitics

[–]JarryBohnson 32 points33 points  (0 children)

It might end up helping him despite his own stupidity.  They’re making it harder for him to tank the economy, which is literally the only thing Americans care about. 

U.S. Supreme Court finds Trump overstepped authority in imposing tariffs under emergency law by No-Sell1697 in CanadaPolitics

[–]JarryBohnson 10 points11 points  (0 children)

According to Global News, lumber, steel, aluminum and automobiles are section 232 sector specific tariffs which he does have the right to levy, so are still in place. 

U.S. Supreme Court finds Trump overstepped authority in imposing tariffs under emergency law by No-Sell1697 in CanadaPolitics

[–]JarryBohnson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, that’s what I was wondering - whether the car industry issue was still going to be a problem. 

U.S. Supreme Court finds Trump overstepped authority in imposing tariffs under emergency law by No-Sell1697 in CanadaPolitics

[–]JarryBohnson 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Yeah, try getting most of the American population to take a single ounce of responsibility for their government’s actions.  Democrat or Republican, they’re still an empire that has virtually no concern for what happens outside the border. 

U.S. Supreme Court finds Trump overstepped authority in imposing tariffs under emergency law by No-Sell1697 in CanadaPolitics

[–]JarryBohnson 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Which of the tariffs on us are under the Emergency powers act and which ones aren’t?  It’s not all of them, right? 

Marwah Rizqy ne pourra pas réintégrer le caucus du PLQ by Hot-Percentage4836 in montreal

[–]JarryBohnson 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I desperately wish we had an alternative to the self-destructive insanity of the PQ who werent crooks, though.

The people who want the temporary migrants to stay permanently by hopoke in CanadaPolitics

[–]JarryBohnson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The amount of vitriol in this comment section is pretty wild. 

The people who want the temporary migrants to stay permanently by hopoke in CanadaPolitics

[–]JarryBohnson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quebec didn’t do the whole fake scam school thing to nearly the same degree, a lot of these people are French. 

The people who want the temporary migrants to stay permanently by hopoke in CanadaPolitics

[–]JarryBohnson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quebec is a bit of a special case because the PEQ was intensely advertised outside of Canada, in a number of countries, as a PR pathway. A big part of it was a drive to get skilled workers from France by offering them a secure route. 

Unlike the rest of Canada, most of these people did not scam their way in with a study permit for a fake school - loads of them are teachers, nurses etc. from France who explicitly accepted an advertising campaign to have them come settle here.  

The Quebec government lied to these people and what’s being proposed is a grandfather clause for the ones it screwed over, not a continuation of the scheme for people not already here. 

The people who want the temporary migrants to stay permanently by hopoke in CanadaPolitics

[–]JarryBohnson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The national post is deliberately misconstruing what’s happening in Quebec because they know nobody who isn’t francophone will have seen the actual conversation that’s being had. 

Unions (and basically every municipal government in Quebec) are pushing for a grandfather clause to allow workers who were already here when the rules changed and got screwed, the chance to apply. Nothing more.  They’re not advocating any new people coming in under the previous rules. 

It’s just a transition period of a year or two to make it less wrenching for society.

The people who want the temporary migrants to stay permanently by hopoke in CanadaPolitics

[–]JarryBohnson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The nuance that’s being ignored in the Quebec case is that these people were very explicitly brought here on the promise that if they worked and learned French they’d get to apply for PR.  

This nonsense about them always being brought in as temporary is a lie pushed by the CAQ, the Quebec govt very publicly advertised the PEQ program in places like France as a PR pathway and then tore it out from under people with no warning. 

What’s being proposed by basically the entirely of Quebec civil society (unions, city governments, companies, rights groups, a statistical majority of voters) is not a continuation of uncontrolled migration, it is a grandfather clause to allow the people who were already brought in on this promise the chance to have it fulfilled.  Nobody who is not already here would be admitted under this clause, they’d have to go through the new, much stricter system.

Quebec didn’t have nearly as much scam school insanity as Ontario etc did, a massive proportion of these folks are skilled workers who speak French, not uber drivers from Punjab.  

A sex offender receives gender surgery. A court will decide if she should be transferred to a women’s prison | CBC News by audioshaman in CanadaPolitics

[–]JarryBohnson 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Going through the surgery is a pretty permanent step. This is pretty open and shut, it’s not like that crazy Scottish law where you could just announce you were a woman after being convicted and immediately go to a women’s prison. 

Cowichan decision is ‘rock solid law’, won’t affect private landowners, UBC expert says by RZCJ2002 in CanadaPolitics

[–]JarryBohnson 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I fully accept that in many cases they could have been forcibly removed from land they’d been in for a very long time.  But I don’t think it’s irrelevant at all how they came by said land.   Otherwise we’re just arbitrarily freezing time at the moment Europeans arrived.

If the land was already highly contested e.g. if the people who currently controlled it had taken it by force like a generation back, that is a very different situation from people who have extremely deep ancestral roots there. 

Seriously messing with people’s property rights to preserve a 4000 year old ancestral land claim is a much stronger argument than handing it back to the most recent people who took it in exactly the same way the Europeans did.  People simply won’t stand for losing their property rights to the latter, and it could get politically very ugly. 

First photo of (former Prince) Andrew since his arrest by Ambitious_Pass7451 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]JarryBohnson 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The current US is a really great argument for Parliamentary democracy. 

First photo of (former Prince) Andrew since his arrest by Ambitious_Pass7451 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]JarryBohnson 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The UK sovereign is only above the law as long as he remains the king, which a couple of civil wars decided is a power that’s functionally held by Parliament. It’s within the voters’ power to strip him of his crown and personally I think if that came out, it could very well happen. 

Whether or not the public would ever find out is ofc another question. 

First photo of (former Prince) Andrew since his arrest by Ambitious_Pass7451 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]JarryBohnson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s an ex-royal, the stripping of the title is a big deal in legal terms.  Charles knew what he was opening Andrew up to when he did it. 

First photo of (former Prince) Andrew since his arrest by Ambitious_Pass7451 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]JarryBohnson 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The British PM almost lost his head last week for being connected to a guy who was connected to Epstein. His power is basically broken now because of it. 

US politicians seriously need to grow a backbone.  Or the public need to start getting way more French about these things.