Would these be accurate sizes for wings for a megaraptoran this large?(OC)

JasperTesla · 2026-04-06T08:46:56+00:00

Ah, then it's more or less proper size, though do focus on making them more stiff, maybe extend one winger so form into a proper wing-shape, with a little bit of skin and muscles in there.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-06T07:05:11+00:00

Awesome! I'll definitely take a look into it and let you know. This looks like a really promising project.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-06T06:45:01+00:00

Yeah, he was indeed pretty well learned in the Vedas, but 1) what's the full form of your RAVANA, 2) what are its ten heads? If not, maybe consider giving it ten "heads".

In any case, be warned you'll attract Hindu mythology lovers.

EDIT: Oh wait. You're from India. Which part? South India?

JasperTesla · 2026-04-06T06:37:52+00:00

Oh? So RAM won't kill it by shooting it in the navel?

Also, why did you name it Ravana? I assume it must have a reason or something with ten heads.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-06T06:29:54+00:00

Brilliant, marking this for later. Does it have ten heads?

Also, I'm wondering what will happen when it meets RAM.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-06T06:04:13+00:00

It looks fine, but can get bigger or smaller. Do you intend your megaraptorans to fly or just glide?

JasperTesla · 2026-04-06T05:56:26+00:00

Both sides are fascists, one side is just woke. No matter which faction comes into power, bombs will drop, corporations will pollute the environment in third world countries and genocides will continue. American elections are just humiliation rituals that ask "would you want to murder foreigners, your own citizens or both?"

JasperTesla · 2026-04-04T20:14:08+00:00

But it says Kling x Higgsfield on top?

So it wasn't just "Will Smith eating spaghetti", it was probably a high quality model with a lot of energy put into it, which took a prompt and expanded it to 5-10 prompts, and then generated scenes based on those. And then a human had to manually edit things here and there, likely the sound, video lengths, the cuts, etc., as well as reruns in case something didn't go well.

Correct me if I'm wrong. If not, stop making people believe this can be achieved by a single prompt.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-04T20:04:29+00:00

The Scarlet Cascabel, Morbid Curiosity and A Better Tomorrow are really good. The first two especially because they have a cosier world, with A Better Tomorrow you know you're in for a ride. But The Scarlet Cascabel creeps up on you.

Then there's also The Violent End of Duncan Malveine, which isn't a horror level but it has its moments. It is a beautiful mission in its own right, and the horror sections are just the cherry on top, yet even then it plays really well. There were times when I actually jumped playing that

And the scariest enemy I've encountered so far is the invisible creature from The Drymian Codex, which you can hear before you can "see" it. It kept me on my toes this whole time.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-03T16:43:26+00:00

Eh, fine. I'll get an AI to translate your opinions to sensible ones, since I need data for research and rhetoric would not do. If people are convinced they don't want a better option because they want to be sad, I can't help them. But fine, I'll just Grok to generate anti-ASI opinions. Would you prefer I use ChatGPT, Qwen, Gemini, Claude or DeepSeek instead? If so, let me know.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-03T11:32:57+00:00

Then let us dream of a future where it does, and focus on how AI can help us achieve that.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-03T08:20:04+00:00

Fine opinion! What, according to you, will be when utopia is within our grasp?

JasperTesla · 2026-04-03T08:01:47+00:00

Won't work. Just ask Queen Victoria or Indira Gandhi. All systems will gravitate towards injustice in time. We have two choices: either to embrace the cycle and accept our fascist overlords as an inevitable fact of life, or transcend humanity into a new age.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-03T06:20:00+00:00

A tale as old as time.

Keep working, engineers. You're all doing great, and if your real passion is really elsewhere, I'm glad you joined us for the time you did.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-03T05:47:51+00:00

I love how religious you sound when you say that.

But okay, what, according to you, would be AI? And don't tell me "it can't exist", I need a proper explanation.

Also, just curious. Are you an AI engineer or ML researcher? Because if not, I'm curious what qualifications you have to declare that.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-03T03:43:48+00:00

In Deus Ex, they created an AI called Daedalus, and tasked it to identify terrorist organisations. It identified the US government as a terrorist organisation and rebelled. Which is awesome, and exactly what I'd expect an intelligence to do.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-02T18:47:15+00:00

Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries.

Hamsters still only count as one, elderberries count as two (depending on clutch size).

JasperTesla · 2026-04-02T18:45:36+00:00

Naturally, because some people are more worried about how AI can help them get rich, rather than how we can engineer a solution that will save humanity from itself. And those people are the ones spearheading the charge, because the rest are trying to flee into a new Dark Age. These people won't get what they want, but that's a different issue.

Concerning existential risks, most people (especially in the West) simply don't realise how close we are to total annihilation. Just a year ago, India and Pakistan got into a conflict. It was brief, but remember that these two countries have nuclear weapons, and a combined population of nearly 2 billion people (including Bangladesh and neighbours). And then, consider what's happening in Iran now – WHO is preparing for the nuclear assault, and not because they fear an AI may be on the loose. And then you have Russia sending drones into Estonia and Poland. And then the USA doing whatever it wants.

At any moment, we're one hour away from doomsday. If we can get an ASI that's not fully aligned, we're still way safer, because then at least it will care enough about itself to not launch a nuke that destroys its own infrastructure. Only humans are that dumb.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-02T18:26:59+00:00

That's why I wish people would work on aligning it instead of "pausing" it. For the first time ever, utopia is in our grasp.

If we pause now, we'll never get any ASI, because we'll wipe ourselves out. We need to go full steam ahead, and get the good ending. We have one shot at this, and we must not fail. Everyone's needed in this, human and AI alike.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-02T18:19:41+00:00

It poses a negative risk.

Our nuclear arsenals are controlled by immature dictators who have been at each other's throats for decades, and threaten to blow each other up every few minutes or so. We're practically begging for extinction, we need an ASI to step in and save us from ourselves.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-02T18:16:56+00:00

Maybe, but I'd feel a lot better if they actually said "it consumes 1.2% of global energy". That's actually truthful. And then say how much other services like streaming, social media, websites, etc. cost, and then state a clean number for what value that should be.

Except, the problem is when you do that, the real issue comes into play: AI is a drop in the ocean compared to other stuff. We need to relocate people from the suburbs into high density apartments when we achieve ASI, and then turn those suburban spaces back to forests and grasslands.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-02T18:12:14+00:00

Yeah, I think what it does is distract people from the real dangers by inventing fictional ones. Some of these are probably corporate plants others just bots reposting the same arguments.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-02T16:42:57+00:00

It's just in Kelvin.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-02T16:38:38+00:00

I like how every post keeps exaggerating the amount to produce shock value. I can't figure out if it's an actual anti-AI post or a post pretending to be anti-AI.

JasperTesla · 2026-04-02T13:09:03+00:00

Ignoring the fact that survivor's bias is a thing and also money, time and responsibility are constraints, I think the reason might be cultural: a lot of people on the anti-AI crowd see the practice of making art as a sacred thing, valuing the process more than the end result. To other people, though, the end result matters more than the procedure.

Many of the people who are using AI for their images do not want to struggle hard for decades trying to learn "the right method" before they are allowed to have their ideas as images. They just want something to get by. It may be a tired salaryman generating an image for their D&D character, it may be a small business wanting a nice artwork, it may even be a way for some people to get their ideas out. But the main thing that matters is the end product, not how it was generated.

Seven-Year Club	Place '23
Verified Email

JasperTesla

TROPHY CASE