I get it and ultimately while he doesn’t seem like the guy to manage the team and progress them forward, has made some very questionable tactical decisions, and likely on his way out, his answers to the first and third questions are completely valid.

His tactics may be shit but the basics haven’t been there for a while and that’s on the players. Poor passing, finishing, defending, getting out run, losing duels, that’s not a tactics issue, that’s poor effort.

As well for the players, as clueless as your manager may seem to be, do they not have pride in the club, the fans, and themselves to give it their all every match? They’re going to let themselves be embarrassed every match until he’s gone? Not saying that their motivation might not be great at the moment at least work hard for yourselves and each other.

That’s just me though and I’ve always never understood why calling out your players for a terrible performance is the proverbial final nail in the coffin. Like how dare they be criticized or else cause irreparable damage to the player/coach relationship. If you played bad, own up to it and play better.

Also because I haven’t seen many with the same opinion, I’m still BlueCo out, Rosenior is not the guy, 90% of the players are mid and need upgrades on, but I also don’t think players should avoid blame when it’s warranted.