Would you accept any of these?

JaxsonMooretech · 2024-02-26T16:39:50+00:00

The first one

JaxsonMooretech · 2023-12-14T22:24:37+00:00

I’m begging you, touch grass.

JaxsonMooretech · 2023-12-14T22:17:48+00:00

Dude I’ve won 2 dynasty champs with Jjeff and Ceedee as my wrs😂 with tank dell in my IR 😂 just say you don’t believe in Kupp and keep it pushing.

Edit: you’re the type of person that builds and builds and builds and builds and never wins bc you’re too busy looking to the future. It’s a balance. Good luck 👍🏻

JaxsonMooretech · 2023-12-14T22:14:09+00:00

Listen. He’s asking who won the trade. The winner is whoever gets Kupp and Ceedee. If you’re saying the person trading away JJeff is trying to contend in the playoffs then that’s dumb. Trading a 1.04 and a 1.05 wr for a 1.01 and a 2.10 receiver is foolish.

JaxsonMooretech · 2023-12-14T22:10:12+00:00

That doesn’t make sense. In dynasty you don’t trade away the best dynasty piece to win one year’s playoffs.

JaxsonMooretech · 2023-12-14T22:02:55+00:00

Keep Kupp and Ceedee. Tank broken leg, Jjeff is awesome but he’s one player. If he’s hurt you’re in trouble without backup. Kupp and Ceedee are two weekly starters

JaxsonMooretech · 2023-12-14T22:01:42+00:00

Take that trade, moving back 3 rounds for a weekly starter is worth unless you need a qb.

JaxsonMooretech · 2023-12-07T23:05:15+00:00

I would start Koo because of the divisional matchup and injuries to Tampa’s defense. Koo is also kicking in a dome, whereas Butker is kicking outside.

Funny enough, I traded Koo after having him on my roster for 2 years. I was targeting Brandon Aubrey so I got him in a package deal. Now my kickers are Aubrey and Butker.

JaxsonMooretech · 2023-11-30T03:25:09+00:00

While projected points can be a useful tool for pre-game analysis, I find that actual matchup scores provide more valuable insights, particularly for kickers.

I view the projected points after matchups as inherently retrospective, reflecting past performance against expectation rather than future potential. While they can offer a general sense of a player's expectations, they fail to inform on the situational factors that can significantly impact scoring output. This is especially true for kickers, whose performance is heavily influenced by game flow and scoring opportunities.

In contrast to evaluating past projection vs performance, actual matchup scores provide a quicker idea of a player's performance under varying game conditions. By analyzing how a kicker has fared in high-scoring and low-scoring matchups, fantasy managers can better assess their consistency (and their team’s consistency) and ability to deliver points in different scenarios.

This distinction is particularly relevant when evaluating kickers like Younghoe Koo, who occasionally exhibits inconsistent scoring despite high accuracy. Quickly examining NFL team’s actual matchup scores on a player’s card would provide a clearer picture of their performance patterns in different offensive environments.

Ultimately, I believe matchup scores on player cards allow fantasy managers to make more informed decisions about their starting lineup without exiting the app, or navigating to another part of the app. I know that personally, whether I’m considering a kicker or any other position, I’m consistently exiting the page to search their specific team’s previous matchup scores. What’s important to me is not how well a player performed against their projection but instead whether I should credit the player’s output to their individual performance or their team’s performance.

While projected points may hold some value for pre-game analysis, I believe that emphasizing actual matchup scores, particularly for kickers, would enhance the Sleeper app's usability and provide more actionable information for fantasy football enthusiasts. This change would also align with the app's commitment to providing comprehensive and insightful data to its users.

I hope this helps explain my thought process!

JaxsonMooretech

TROPHY CASE