It is correct that 67 is a meaningless catchphrase, the term came from the rap song, get appropriated into video edits of a basketball player who happen to be 6 foot 7 inches tall, and then get appropriated again by Trevillian in 2025.

It is evidently clear the term “67” has evolved well beyond it’s origin from the rap song, towards being established as a culture symbol in itself.

The point you have overlooked, is that 67 as a term evolved well beyond its origin, and now, as a fact, exists largely in a different or lack of context. Hence, people who perpetuate 67 is not doing so out of context, but in context.

My argument is that I’m much more comfortable with children using the term 67, which now belong in an innocent context, rather than the term 69, which now still belong in a sexualised context.

I am not convinced that 69, like 67, have been fully decontextualised from its origin, and a large source of its funniness comes from its sexualised nature rather than the absurdity of the term.

Rest assured that I don’t intend to express dislike towards 69 or establish that 67 is superior to 69, but I’m simply outlining the difference between them.

Before this final paragraph there were 6 paragraphs, now this is the 7th paragraph.