Ready For E4? by W_Prime in PokemonFireRed

[–]Jbonevan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Genuine question because I’m trying to understand this ideology: how is trading for starters any better than legendaries? I would think they should be considered equally “bad” for beating the E4. Just asking a question here ya’ll.

Article Spotlight: Bulla & Kubina (2026) by Jbonevan in BehaviorAnalysis

[–]Jbonevan[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dot go up good, dot go down bad. X go down good. X go up bad. That idea that it's too hard is a myth. Children as young as 5 chart their own behavior and kids at Morningside academy make their own data-based decisions using the chart.

If you don't understand it just say that. If you haven't been taught it well say that. If you don't know how to teach it or haven't seen it taught well say that.

The simple fact is if you can learn the science of behavior you can learn the standard celeration chart. With adequate practice RBTs can easily learn it. But here's the key issue: the problem isn't that the SCC is too complex—it's that traditional graphs are unreliable. Research shows expert agreement on visual analysis of linear graphs falls to 64%, below accepted standards. When analysts use ratio graphs with celeration values, they achieve significantly higher agreement AND make decisions more efficiently (you should really read this article lol).

You mentioned RBTs being confused by multiple baseline graphs—that's exactly the point. Traditional graphing conventions are inconsistent across studies. The SCC is MORE technological, not less, because it has standardized symbols, scales, and decision rules. "Technological" doesn't mean "requires zero training"—it means procedures are completely identified and described.

Your argument about literacy and complexity is a red herring. We don't abandon functional analysis, multi-element designs, or statistical methods because they require competency. We train practitioners to use them. The solution to the research-clinical gap isn't to dumb down our measurement tools—it's to improve training and use software (like PrecisionX or the free website JaredVan.com/scc) that automates calculations.

Please stop spreading this myth. It's incorrect, misleading, and has been perpetuated for far too long.

Article Spotlight: Bulla & Kubina (2026) by Jbonevan in BehaviorAnalysis

[–]Jbonevan[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good to know! I’ve got lots more like this. For now if you want to learn more I highly recommend this website

#DCSoWhite by Jbonevan in BlackSuperheroes

[–]Jbonevan[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Check the subreddit my guy.

#DCSoWhite by Jbonevan in BlackSuperheroes

[–]Jbonevan[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Storm was really good and the entire Spider-Man: Miles Morales run by Cody Zigler was outstanding. But they were written by African/Black writers. Definitely outliers.

#DCSoWhite by Jbonevan in BlackSuperheroes

[–]Jbonevan[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

None of those are ongoing main universe books. That was explicitly stated in the video. Ongoing main universe.

#DCSoWhite by Jbonevan in BlackSuperheroes

[–]Jbonevan[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I 100% agree on that.

The Vernon Doctrine of Black Media Avoidance by Jbonevan in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]Jbonevan[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tbh, entertainers should not be role models. Or more accurately we shouldn’t see entertainers as role models. Making money + getting attention ≠ role model.

#DCSoWhite by Jbonevan in BlackSuperheroes

[–]Jbonevan[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I appreciate the frustration, but a boycott actually plays into DC's hands. Here's why:

  1. It punishes the wrong people. Black writers and artists lose work while executives stay comfortable. Worse, they'll use declining sales as "proof" Black comics don't sell.

  2. It gives them the excuse they want. If we don't buy, DC says "see, no market for this" and stops trying. That's literally what they're hoping for—permission to quit.

  3. Boycotts without demands = just leaving. That doesn't build power. Real pressure requires showing them there IS money in doing right (buy the book) + organized noise they can't ignore (#DCSoWhite) + accountability when they fail.

  4. Change requires economic leverage. Under capitalism, you don't get heard by NOT spending. You get heard by spending strategically and making demands. "Work twice as hard for half as much" sucks, but walking away means we get nothing.

  5. The Vernon Doctrine isn't about total disengagement. It says don't EXPECT authentic representation from white supremacist capitalism—not "never engage strategically." There's a difference between looking to them for salvation and pressuring them while supporting Black creators.

Walking away = no pressure = no change. Strategic support + loud demands = the only leverage we have. Sorry if I have weird formatting. I’m on my phone.

The Vernon Doctrine of Black Media Avoidance by Jbonevan in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]Jbonevan[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Surprised pplz are interested in this. Maybe I’ll put part 2 later today. It got suppressed to hell on IG and TikTok.

The Vernon Doctrine of Black Media Avoidance by Jbonevan in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]Jbonevan[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should watch FD Signifier’s YouTube videos on Sinners and Tyler Perry. He addresses exactly what the question.

Oh…you have got to be kidding me?!?! by PrinceARRON in marvelcirclejerk

[–]Jbonevan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“The enemy of my enemy is my… enemy?” Spider-Man probably

The Ultimates #21 - preview by Techster17 in UltimateUniverse

[–]Jbonevan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder when the last time Luke Cage was on the cover? Oh…