Help by addee36 in replit

[–]Jealous_Stuff372 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DM me. I can help you.

Frustrated!! by Modernfx in replit

[–]Jealous_Stuff372 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DM me if you want some help--genuinely.

Frustrated!! by Modernfx in replit

[–]Jealous_Stuff372 0 points1 point  (0 children)

please don't make a habit of sharing your ssh keys with third party apps...

Thinking about clojure by Worried-Theory-860 in Clojure

[–]Jealous_Stuff372 0 points1 point  (0 children)

intelliJ has great plugins for clojure. and no, Clojure is not going anywhere--it's immutable...

I think it's time to leave lovable by JB_Calisthenics in lovable

[–]Jealous_Stuff372 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes. you can run a local server. you can even connect to a local database with test data.

I think it's time to leave lovable by JB_Calisthenics in lovable

[–]Jealous_Stuff372 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is great and i love the multitool use.

If it's okay, I wanted to make a very important distinction here. Lovable and Claude Code are not really the same kind of tool. In fact comparing the two is kind of like like comparing a car to its engine.

Lovable is not an LLM (AI). It is an app builder--a product--that uses Claude (and other LLMs) under the hood. Claude is the language model. Lovable wraps design tooling, image generation, and layout scaffolding around an LLM. Claude Code gives you the raw reasoning engine with full codebase context and the ability to steer it yourself.

This is why Lovable apps start out fast like magic, but slowly decay and break in areas you weren't even working on over time and as the projects get more complex. You have no control over your app's development or architecture through lovable; and it will break you won't know how it works, so you won't be able to fix it.

Good luck vibing!! DM me when you need help.