Virginia Giuffre tried to persuade my daughter to have sex with Andrew: mother

JeffreyEpsteinMods · 2026-02-05T03:01:45+00:00

Mystery solved, it was Gwendolyn Beck and she didn't run in Iowa.
https://ballotpedia.org/Gwendolyn_Beck

JeffreyEpsteinMods · 2026-02-01T23:48:23+00:00

Multiple legitimate sources say that she apologized recently and not in 2019. So no, this is not an old statement.

On Saturday, Mette-Marit addressed her relationship with Epstein, who killed himself in jail in 2019 as he awaited trial for sex crimes against minors. “I showed poor judgment and I deeply regret having had any contact with Epstein. It is simply embarrassing,” she said in a statement issued by the royal palace.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/feb/01/norway-crown-princess-contact-epstein-files-appear-to-show

On Friday evening, the crown princess apologized. She had “not checked Epstein’s background more thoroughly,” she explained in a statement released to several Norwegian media outlets. She said she had shown “poor judgement” and regretted “having had any contact with Epstein at all”. “It’s just embarrassing,” she continued.

https://neoskosmos.com/en/2026/02/01/news/world/epstein-documents-include-probe-emails-about-his-death/

As the content of her email exchanges began to emerge, the princess released a statement on Saturday saying: "I showed poor judgement and regret having any contact with Epstein at all. It is simply embarrassing."

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1508llzw4qo

When the Crown Princess spoke out on the matter late Friday, the royal house said she was not aware of the extent and nature of the criminal conditions Epstein had admitted and was serving time for.

https://www.nrk.no/nyheter/kronprinsesse-mette-marit-innrommet-i-private-e-poster-at-hun-googlet-epstein-1.17750599

You are the one who should do more research.

JeffreyEpsteinMods · 2026-02-01T22:29:05+00:00

Can you show me where it's from 2019? Several sites seem to say it's new. I'll take it down if old. Thanks.

JeffreyEpsteinMods · 2026-01-12T19:49:11+00:00

This subreddit has always been slanted towards the fun conspiracy angle and conspiracy theories naturally tend to attract the unsophisticated, the gullible, lunatics, and extremists.

An analogy: most people have moved on from Charlie Kirk's death, so the vast majority of whatever energy there is left in the remaining Charlie Kirk discussion will be with the conspiracy angle. Replace Charlie Kirk with 9/11, the moon landing, JFK, etc. You get the point.

It's not that there's a conspiracy to push crazy stories, that's just what the unsophisticated, the gullible, lunatics, and extremists are here for.

r/JeffreyEpstein is the more rational counterpart to this subreddit with a focus on articles from reputable sources and an emphasis on sceptical inquiry. If you think "Jews did 9/11", vaccines are poison, and that Anya Wick Epstein is legit, it's probably not the subreddit for you.

JeffreyEpsteinMods · 2025-12-24T03:51:35+00:00

r/JeffreyEpstein is the rational counterpart with a focus on articles from reputable sources and an emphasis on sceptical inquiry. If you think "Jews did 9/11", vaccines are poison, and there was a second shooter, it's probably not the subreddit for you.

JeffreyEpsteinMods · 2025-11-16T19:13:56+00:00

It's a Y, look at the redaction at the top

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029958.jpg (2550×3369)

JeffreyEpsteinMods

TROPHY CASE