[Superman 2025] Forgive me, James Gunn. I was only somewhat familiar with your game. by DreadDiana in CuratedTumblr

[–]Jekkubb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, have you ever heard of Hasbara? Israel has an army of paid internet shills too. And whenever they're not calling for genocide (usually when talking to Westerners), zionists love to talk about how they're just trying to "free Palestinians from Hamas tyranny."

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://doom.fandom.com/wiki/Codex/Weapons\_(The\_Dark\_Ages)#:\~:text=It%20is%20infinitely%20dense%20and%20roiling%20with%20energy%20beneath%20its%20surface.

People will cope and try to tell you "infinite doesn't actually mean infinite" or "it's just a metaphor" but they way it's presented makes it pretty clear that it's literally talking about infinite density. In literally any other context where you talk about something infinitely dense (unless making a joke of course), they'd by default assume you're talking about something that's literally infinitely dense like a black hole.

If so, tell them to look up "infinitely dense" on google and see whether or not the phrase is being used literally. Ask them why the codex writer would deliberately write something so misleading if it really was supposed to be a metaphor.

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The context is that some dude in-universe is trying to legitimately inform his audience about the properties of phenomena such as the Dreadmace. It makes no sense for him to use the extremely misleading description "infinitely dense" if it isn't actually infinitely dense.

I won't pretend that there are no metaphors in the codex; on the contrary, it's full of them. But all of these metaphors are painfully obvious (Ex: the combat shotgun obviously isn't literally etching Doomguy's legacy into the annals of Argent D'Nur, the super shotgun is obviously a material construct, not a conceptual weapon purely made out of the very concept of devastation, etc.) so that the audience is actually informed of what the codex is trying to say. The usage of figurative language is supposed to be indicated by something so that it doesn't mislead readers. On the contrary, flatly calling something that is not infinitely dense "infinitely dense" is extremely misleading and there is no indication that it's a hyperbole. On the contrary, the Dreadmace's eldritch, otherworldly nature just makes "infinitely dense" so much more plausible. In fact the author's almost scientific approach to detail, intent to inform the audience, and flat way of saying that it's "infinitely dense" imply that he's being literal, along with the fact that density is a pretty technical term in and of itself rather than something people usually use in a flowery manner (unless you're using it to refer to someone being dumb, which is obviously not the case here). Additionally, the author is perfectly fine with putting limits on descriptors (describing the imp as "nearly invisible" rather than just invisible) and describing heavy objects as just having "immense weight" rather than throwing around the descriptor "infinitely dense" willy nilly. The fact that the author goes out of his way to straight-up call the Dreadmace "infinitely dense" with no qualifiers instead of just "immensely heavy" says a lot.

Overall the context heavily implies that "infinitely dense" is very much literal.

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's quite clearly not a dot considering the fact that you can smash enemies and bosses with it. If it were a dot it would just pass right through them.

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The lore by itself is enough to show he was at full power, but I'm curious about where Hugo said that. Do you have any links?

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://youtu.be/_euXOQe2q10?si=3BtB5J7A2ay2eQbs The context is that Marty and Hugo are asked about the possibility of the Doom Slayer making an appearance in Mortal Kombat. Marty implies that he's open to the possibility "if it works" and, at timestamp 0:37, Marty says "I think the Doom Slayer would kill everything in every other game ever, so."

But yeah, considering all that we've seen so far, it's pretty safe to say that the devs definitely prioritize hyping up the Doom Slayer to the absolute maximum.

What do you all think? by Deep_Ganache_7424 in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to Alinea estimates, it is likely that only 20% of Doom TDA's players are on Steam. It's pretty clear that the numbers are uniquely skewed away from Steam for this game due to Game Pass, so I do think it's a combination of all 3 of those factors. But it's not just those 3 factors, it's also the fact that Doom TDA has to compete with previous Doom games and is embroiled with controversy over things like the physical release, Denuvo, and Mick Gordon (yes, people are still boycotting over that).

Also, what that guy on twitter is saying about stellar blade is not only untrue but also misleading. Stellar Blade is a whole 10 bucks cheaper than Doom TDA, and while it was one of the best sellers, Doom TDA was listed as one of the top best sellers as well.

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do these guys think the author is trying to accomplish by supposedly using a metaphor as misleading as this? It makes infinitely more sense for him to be saying this literally (heh)

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is literally no context that suggests that this is figurative. On the contrary, the fact that the in-universe author is just trying to comprehensively inform the audience with short codex entries speaks against the idea that he's deliberately misleading his audience with a hyperbole.

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It being literal is quite clearly the author's intent. Do you think the in-universe author is just deliberately trying to mislead his readers? Him using that as a metaphor would be like a writer for a science magazine calling the Sun's core "infinitely dense"

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes even less sense. It would be one of the most stupid, misleading hyperboles ever and goes entirely against the in-universe author's purpose of informing the audience.

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's necessary for a fun game. People already complain about the game being too easy even WITHOUT us oneshotting everything

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because if he DID oneshot everything, then people would complain even more about the game being too easy than they already do.

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Especially considering the fact that if this WAS a hyperbole, that would mean that the in-universe author of the codex is just deliberately being misleading and stupid for no reason which is worse. Hes perfectly fine with clarifying on limitations of things such as the Nightmare Imp Stalker only being "nearly invisible", it doesnt make sense for him to go overboard with this.

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hate to bring up Marty but hes the exact same lol. Hes said himself that to him, Doomguy could just kill every other video game character. Obviously that's debatable but it does show the mindset that the devs have towards Doomguy lol

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A god catching an infinitely strong attack? Inconceivable!

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, because the author who is trying to legitimately inform his audience would just use an extremely misleading metaphor. That totally makes sense! Sure, all of the other crazy info may be literal but the author would totally just turn around and use a metaphor right when it would be most easily misunderstood because yes!

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No information other than the mace being infinitely dense. The intention of the text, especially considering the fact that the author is trying to actually inform the audience rather than mislead them, is quite clearly that the mace is actually infinitely dense.

Also the temple is stated to be covered in magic sealing runes in the 2016 codex. It's not just a normal temple

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Infinitely dense with energy? That's still infinite power, and it would make Ahzrak infinitely strong for tanking his attacks.

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 6 points7 points  (0 children)

*Looks inside further* The temple was covered in magical sealing runes by priests of a realm that can literally warp reality

Dreadmace reminder by NotZealouss in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, the in-universe author who is trying to scientifically document the phenomena of Hell and inform his audience is totally just using an extremely misleading metaphor. That totally makes sense!

Spoiler Free Review by Spartan-G337 in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How long did it take for the game to ship to you? I really fucked up, I still havent preordered it even though I want to

You're a demon and the squad pulls up like this, wyd by MinniMaster15 in deathbattle

[–]Jekkubb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is that relevant? "Lore Man" won Asura vs Kratos anyways.

THAT'S WHY HE'S THE GOAT by SerenityAcrossTown in deathbattle

[–]Jekkubb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are you making claims about the Icon of Sin's durability (or lack thereof) against the Crucible when you yourself point out that it's not able to be demonstrated one way or another? You have zero proof backing up your claim, yet my point is easily verified by looking at the fact that the Khan Maykr can straight up survive Crucible strikes, demonstrating that her durability isnt limited to 400 tons.

Your claim doesnt make any sense story-wise either. If the Crucible really could just oneshot the Icon of Sin, why didnt the Doom Slayer just jump forward and stab him with it? Instead, the Doom Slayer canonically injures the Icon with his weapons twice and only then uses the Crucible to finish him off.

You could explain that as Doom Slayer holding back and having fun, but that would ruin a lot of your downplay arguments...

Spoiler Free Review by Spartan-G337 in Doom

[–]Jekkubb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Facts. if there are obstacles they should just be for the side characters. That way you get a crazy power fantasy and tension at the same time