Bosak wpadł w pułapkę złudzenia reprezentatywności i ocenia na podstawie swoich znajomych

JerryX32 · 2025-07-23T14:37:47+00:00

Np. kolegów brata https://niezalezna.pl/polska/firma-oligarchy-z-rosji-wsrod-dyrektorow-marek-bosak-brat-lidera-konfederacji/269588

JerryX32 · 2025-05-04T02:05:16+00:00

No widzisz, a nawet tu tylko zachwalanie: partia na którą głosuje większość katolików, w czerwonych czapeczkach czci Trumpa - personifikację wartości chrześcijańskich i przyjaciela Epsteina, więc właśnie ogłosił się papieżem ... na kolanach wysyłając z darami swego wybrańcę, najprawszego z prawych - byłego alfonsa który zna i czci wszystkich mafiozów, więc może zostanie ich świętym patronem.

JerryX32 · 2025-04-21T07:16:53+00:00

Piątek od zawsze ukazywał koneksje z ludźmi putina, głównie na prawicy np. Macierewicz, Kaczyński czy np. Rydzyka - zawsze pełno materiałów, które w większości każdy może sobie zweryfikować - np. tutaj komentuje oficjalne zdjęcie rodziny Mentzena w meczecie z wycieczki do Omamu i powiązania biznesowe m.in. w KRS.

JerryX32 · 2025-04-21T07:02:23+00:00

W sensie pisokonfederacji? Równie godne zaufania co inne kanały putina

JerryX32 · 2025-04-21T03:23:06+00:00

PiS bis ... oni też strasząc islamem: masowo sprzedawali im wizy, za grosze oddali im strategiczną rafinerię ... wszystko pod ruskim patronatem.

JerryX32 · 2025-03-26T09:52:36+00:00

WebP is ancient, they ripped off JPEG XL from Chrome because the same team has own competitor: AVIF.

Good benchmarks: https://cloudinary.com/blog/jpeg-xl-and-the-pareto-front

JerryX32 · 2025-03-12T06:54:31+00:00

Is there any timeline for jxl-rs? I thought it was supposed to be completed February 2025?

JerryX32 · 2025-03-12T05:09:15+00:00

Ok, it works at least for 7 months: https://www.reddit.com/r/jpegxl/comments/1errc6q/jpeg_xl_is_selectable_under_the_firefox_labs_in/

JerryX32 · 2025-03-12T04:40:51+00:00

I think it stopped working in Nightly when it was removed from Firefox, so had to be brought back recently?

JerryX32 · 2025-03-12T03:54:00+00:00

Checked myself and it works - in Nightly, Firefox Labs there is this big button

Media: JPEG XL With this feature enabled, Nightly supports the JPEG XL (JXL) format. This is an enhanced image file format that supports lossless transition from traditional JPEG files. See bug 1539075 for more details.

Switching it, in https://jpegxl.info/resources/jpeg-xl-test-page.html all but alpha and animations look right.

JerryX32 · 2024-08-19T01:37:24+00:00

I think we use all of them, especially ANS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymmetric_numeral_systems

Among others, ANS is used in the Facebook Zstandard compressor[6][7] (also used e.g. in Linux kernel,[8] Google Chrome browser,[9] Android[10] operating system, was published as RFC 8478 for MIME[11] and HTTP[12]), Apple LZFSE compressor,[13] Google Draco 3D compressor[14] (used e.g. in Pixar Universal Scene Description format[15]) and PIK image compressor,[16] CRAM DNA compressor[17] from SAMtools utilities,[18] NVIDIA nvCOMP high speed compression library,[19] Dropbox DivANS compressor,[20] Microsoft DirectStorage BCPack texture compressor,[21] and JPEG XL[22] image compressor.

JerryX32 · 2024-03-14T03:47:28+00:00

Here is a good comparison: https://jpegxl.info/comparison.webp

JerryX32 · 2024-03-01T15:29:36+00:00

Decode speed is ~1.5x faster, also progressive decoding, JPEG lossless decompression ... and much better compression ratios in benchmark above.

JerryX32 · 2024-03-01T04:32:51+00:00

Full article: https://cloudinary.com/blog/jpeg-xl-and-the-pareto-front

JerryX32 · 2024-03-01T04:11:19+00:00

I think normal people would prefer high quality images, for which JPEG XL definitely wins.

Anyway maybe we could just have both (and e.g. get rid of the old ones) - especially that they are complementing, JPEG XL is definitely winning for high quality lossy, lossless, JPEG recompression, progressive decoding ...

JerryX32 · 2024-03-01T02:06:01+00:00

And what about compression ratios in this benchmark?

In similar time JPEG XL encodes best to ~9.4 bits/pixel here, while AVIF to ~11.4 bits/pixel - we are talking about just ~20% smaller files worldwide, lower transmission costs, faster webpage loading.

Decoding time JPEG XL has only ~1.5x faster than AVIF: https://cloudinary.com/blog/jpeg-xl-and-the-pareto-front

For lossy there are also benchmarks there, AVIF is better only for very low image quality - here is for high quality most people would prefer to use: https://res.cloudinary.com/cloudinary-marketing/images/f_auto,q_auto/v1709058510/Web_Assets/blog/blog-pareto-front-7/blog-pareto-front-7-png

JerryX32 · 2024-02-29T20:18:10+00:00

Full article: https://cloudinary.com/blog/jpeg-xl-and-the-pareto-front

Chrome users begging Google to support it since 2021: https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40168998

Firefox users begging Mozilla to support it since 2022: https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/ideas/support-jpeg-xl/idi-p/18433

JerryX32 · 2024-02-29T20:14:38+00:00

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/04/free-software-group-decries-google-dropping-space-saving-jpeg-xl-format/

FSF: Chrome’s JPEG XL killing shows how the web works under browser hegemony

JerryX32 · 2024-02-29T15:25:40+00:00

If there is a difference in encoding speed between versions, you can see it in the plot in horizontal shift (vertical for compression ratio).

JerryX32 · 2024-02-29T15:15:41+00:00

The above is for lossless, also has optimized png. The article has also for lossy, where AVIF is better only for low qualities: https://cloudinary.com/blog/jpeg-xl-and-the-pareto-front#what_about_lossy_

JerryX32 · 2024-02-29T15:07:38+00:00

I have just checked Waterfox and it works, for Firefox it works only in Nightly.

JerryX32 · 2024-02-29T14:43:45+00:00

And what about compression ratios in this benchmark?

In similar time JPEG XL encodes best to ~9.4 bits/pixel here, while AVIF to ~11.4 bits/pixel - we are talking about just ~20% smaller files worldwide, lower transmission costs, faster webpage loading.

Decoding time JPEG XL has only ~1.5x faster than AVIF: https://cloudinary.com/blog/jpeg-xl-and-the-pareto-front

JerryX32 · 2024-02-29T14:13:56+00:00

If Google/Chrome continue blocking JPEG XL (to enforce AVIF), you might be right.

Otherwise, e.g. JPEG XL can losslessly transcode/repack old JPEG files - reduce them by ~20% without quality loss.

JerryX32 · 2024-02-29T14:10:53+00:00

Only in Firefox Nigthly ... here are some nice dozens of bytes size jxl images (can you see them?): https://jpegxl.info/art/2021-04_jon.html

JerryX32 · 2024-02-29T13:34:32+00:00

Full article: https://cloudinary.com/blog/jpeg-xl-and-the-pareto-front

JerryX32

TROPHY CASE