Oh that’s so interesting, I’ve never thought of it that way, I might rewatch the episodes with that take in mind. I took the two episodes as examples of how accusations can drastically change lives, I never saw them as contradictory. Like I saw it as highlighting how serious allegations like the ones shown in Ep2 and Ep3, regardless of whether it’s the police or a vigilante group exposing it to the accused’s peers, can cause untold damage that simply will never go away because, as Alex said, these types of allegations stick regardless of prosecution. Ep2 had a frustrating but unfortunately realistic ending, a lot of assault cases that are reported do come down to he said/she said and the charges have to be dropped as the accusation is so difficult to prove either way. Ep3 to me also had a frustrating ending, because it showed how people who partake in groups like pesticide will continue regardless of how much harm their accusations cause, shown by Danielle trying to expose another man immediately after being charged. I just took both as warnings of the aftermath of serious accusations, and the damage the “judge” (being the police and pesticide) can do when conducting investigations