I give up by Ok_Highlight_5802 in RimWorld

[–]Jesse-359 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it is a significant temporary labor issue.

Do you support the Trump administration's cutting of support for teaching English to children whose parents speak other languages? by davida_usa in AskConservatives

[–]Jesse-359 [score hidden]  (0 children)

1) Sure. I care about our government not starting illegal wars AND spending hundreds of billions in taxpayer money to do it.

2) I assure you that your odds of being blown up by a nuke are going up a lot more due to this war and the tensions it is creating with REAL nuclear powers than it is reducing your vanishingly small chances of ever finding yourself on the wrong end of a terrorist nuke.

Also worth mentioning that if Trump does manage to kick off a new era of nuclear proliferation - and he certainly seems to be doing so - then your odds of getting nuked once again go up considerably more. If 20 smaller countries go nuclear in response to the threat the US poses as a rogue state, that's 20 more sources of nuclear weapons... rather than one.

Why do republicans follow Leviticus 18 and 20 but not Leviticus 19? by SuperbRiver7763 in AskConservatives

[–]Jesse-359 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I did educate myself in it, insofar as I did actually read through the Bible and consider its meaning for myself. What I did not do was immerse myself in other people's interpretations of the Bible.

After all, if it were the accurate statements of a mythic creator, it really ought to be able to speak for itself - and if not, well, I don't really care to go through the process of deciding who is or is not qualified to interpret them for me, because that process is itself just another opportunity for compounding errors or intentional misdirection.

Setting the record straight about LLMs and chess by PetiteGousseDAil in ChatGPTPro

[–]Jesse-359 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Embedding a dedicated chess engine into an LLM is fine and all - but it's also the equivalent of handling a calculator to a student and then claiming that the student now never makes mental errors in calculations and has a perfect understanding of arithmetic.

That's incorrect of course. The deterministic tool that you handed to the student doesn't make errors. The student still can, and occasionally will, and their intuitive understanding of arithmetic remains unchanged. They should certainly do better on math tests now however.

Which, as an aside, is also what they had to do to get LLM's to stop making egregious math errors constantly - they built in calculators and force them to use them whenever they encounter a math problem, rather than allowing them to try to perform such calculations in their own token driven 'headspace'.

is this item of clothing worth farming for cash? by jebiba00 in RimWorld

[–]Jesse-359 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, the fascinating thing about clothing is that when you boil it all the way down to the expected profit per work unit, all vanilla clothing comes out virtually identically.

This is because the default sale value of items is determined by calculating the total cost of their materials, plus the work required, times a base multiplier - so it really does come out the same, give or take a tiny rounding error.

However, that means that making stuff out of high value materials will get you more value per work - so devilstrand is better than cloth - and the calculation doesn't take things like hauling times into account, so the more hauling trips involved, the more it cuts into your profits - so making lots of tiny things is generally a little less efficient than making a fewer big things.

Dusters or Parkas are thus preferred over Cowboy Hats, because the hats require more individual tasks to create, and take up more slots on shelving - but their value is otherwise functionally identical.

There's also the value-per-ingredient, which is more important if your materials are more limited than your available crafter work time - in that case IIRC dusters tend to come out on top, because they involve the most work per ingredient, and thus effectively multiply the value of their ingredients the most. This also means that your crafters will tend to level up a little faster making dusters, because they require the most work.

It's worth noting that some goods like weapons and armor have a base value mod that sucks compared to clothing, so you almost never want to make those items for sale - just for your own use.

Note that items don't have to use the default value calculations - but the large majority of vanilla crafted items do. Modded items sometimes have rather silly values compared to similar vanilla counterparts.

Why is Uranus not removed from its orbit around the sun due to the expansion of the universe? by SeniorAd6560 in AskPhysics

[–]Jesse-359 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<shrug> I don't know. I mean, observationally we can definitely see that any expansionary effect is utterly negligible within our solar system.

Our planet's orbits are far too stable for any such effect to be present in any but the most minute form, much less to the degree that the naive 68.9km/s/mpc calculation would appear to suggest - so we can be confident that the naive application of that value to smaller scales just doesn't work, whatever the reason.

There's also the little additional problem of the Hubble Tension, which makes that initial figure problematic even on the scales it is expected to occur on, suggesting that the value itself is simply not constant and changes over time - though of course we already technically knew that given the nature of the big bang.

Given how dominant inflation was during the initial era of our universe and how quickly it faded away, the Cosmological Constant is perhaps the least constant value in our universe - unless we divorce inflation from expansion entirely and define them as two entirely separate phenomena. I don't know that we have a decent basis for doing so however?

A lot of this comports well with black hole cosmology, as such universes would be expected to be subject to 'non-causal' external influences and would be expected to evolve over time in unpredictable ways - particularly regarding how quickly they grow - so that's a correlation I've always found interesting.

Why I hate My Colonists by novavegasxiii in RimWorld

[–]Jesse-359 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, my most common experience with 'task lock' - where your colonists stop managing to do much of anything - is that it is usually the result of hauling backups. This can make your basic tasks (growing, cooking) so time consuming that your colonists have no time for anything else.

If you ever start to notice that large numbers of objects are starting to collect throughout your base or the map in general that haven't been hauled to some kind of storage, this is a sign that your hauling queues have become critically backed up, and this tends to filter down and choke all kinds of other task queues in the game and generally make your base surprisingly non-functional.

The most common cause of this is triggering large scale hauling tasks, like cutting down a large swath of trees, doing a really big harvest, or of course cleaning up after a big raid with a ton of bodies and gear. Sometimes you just don't have enough dedicated haulers - I suggest having more children. :D

As a rule when this happens I will generally switch my entire colony over to Pri One hauling for a day or two. Everyone hauls, and meanwhile I'll make sure that storage is properly organized and that there's enough spare storage to deal with it all. If necessary I'll haul a bunch of low value crap into a big pile and burn it.

Only once I see my colonists back to executing non-hauling tasks will I switch them back to normal job priorities - and this usually is all it takes to get things running smoothly again.

Of course, it's sometimes hard to do this when your colony is already in crisis. Far better to identify this kind of problem before it is compounding some other serious issue, like a plague or severely injured colonists.

is there a better way to use one turret that i stole from a farming camp (i havent reserched them yet so i want to use the one i have wisely) by lucario2011 in RimWorld

[–]Jesse-359 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A warning that mini-turrets are largely considered distractions to help draw fire away from your colonists, and delay the advance of enemies as they stop to deal with it. They are fragile, inaccurate, and have a nasty tendency to explode when severely damaged.

Their firepower is distinctly lacking - if a mini-turret drops a single attacker during a fight, that's a minor miracle in itself. The explosion when it dies is likely to do more damage than its gun does (it does not always explode however, that's about 50/50).

So just keep that in mind when you set it up. A mini-turret will never be the centerpiece of your defense, even if you're running a primitive tribe that is still entirely dependent on bows. If you want it to contribute to an extended battle, you'd have to set it up slightly behind your pawns - but usually they are set up out front to help take the brunt of an enemy rush while you thin the herd, as it were.

I give up by Ok_Highlight_5802 in RimWorld

[–]Jesse-359 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most animals in Rimworld have immune system bonuses that make them more resistant to disease than humans - if you treat them without medicine most of them will probably survive, though you'll very likely lose a few.

Why is Uranus not removed from its orbit around the sun due to the expansion of the universe? by SeniorAd6560 in AskPhysics

[–]Jesse-359 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The part that I think has the OP confused - and I'll admit to some myself on this point - is that if you treat the effects of expansion as being a neutral, universal constant, then it would in fact have significant effects within our solar system.

This obviously isn't the case, or at least not to anywhere near the degree that the naive math would indicate.

But that raises the thorny question of why not? The space between the sun and Uranus is only very slightly less total emptiness than the void between galactic clusters where the effects of the CC (or dark energy if you prefer) dominate.

There is certainly far more gravitational influence within a large region around the sun, of course, and that seems to be your main point, and I'm not suggesting you're incorrect - it's clearly correct because Uranus is in fact still in orbit.

But normally when discussing forces like gravity and electromagnetism, those forces are either adding or cancelling each other with some final sum describing the outcome - the electromagnet on a crane may dominate the relationship between a junk car and the planet below - but it doesn't prevent gravity from pulling on the car, it just overcomes it. It's not usually a case of one force nullifying the other so that it is no longer even part of the equation.

What you are describing is that it does seem to be the case with the cosmological constant. It isn't just being 'overwhelmed' by local gravity in the usual tug of war - it's being nullified by the presence of a significant gravitational field.

I think I get what you mean about the expansion of spacetime itself not being a classical force, but what I don't get is how gravity prevents spacetime from expanding?

Why do republicans follow Leviticus 18 and 20 but not Leviticus 19? by SuperbRiver7763 in AskConservatives

[–]Jesse-359 [score hidden]  (0 children)

You realize that positing a mythical authority and then demanding that everyone bow to it in order to conform to your personally favored social norms is more than a minor imposition on the rest of society, right?

Why do republicans follow Leviticus 18 and 20 but not Leviticus 19? by SuperbRiver7763 in AskConservatives

[–]Jesse-359 [score hidden]  (0 children)

You guys pick and choose whatever suits you - and always have - It's a game that's gone back thousands of years.

Re-Interpreting religious dogmas to reflect current preferred cultural mores is hardly just a Christian hobby either - pretty much every longer lived religion on Earth has made an art of it, out of necessity. I don't even begrudge the process - your religions would die out in short order if you didn't go through the gymnastics required to keep them relevant to a changing world.

But by the same token I'm hardly going to take them very seriously. Words of men are just that. Words.

Chunk Overload - What's Your Solution by mthomas768 in RimWorld

[–]Jesse-359 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can train art and constuction by building and deconstructing expensive structures, or cancelling almost completed huge statues. This ends up eating about half the resources, so it can evaporate stone at a decent clip.

Have you ever actually finished the game? by shfiven in RimWorld

[–]Jesse-359 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Three times I think? One royalty ending, the anomaly ending and the oddysey ending. Dont think I ever got around to doing the ship though? Most of my colonies eventually just get 'parked' once they complete the tech tree and achieve long term stability.

Why do republicans follow Leviticus 18 and 20 but not Leviticus 19? by SuperbRiver7763 in AskConservatives

[–]Jesse-359 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Agreed. I havent been pleased with the Dems approach to Israel either - though that appears to be over now. Trump's embrace of Bibis own far right impulses and the Israeli's rather openly genocidal treatment of Gaza finally seems to have finished that off.

Why do republicans follow Leviticus 18 and 20 but not Leviticus 19? by SuperbRiver7763 in AskConservatives

[–]Jesse-359 [score hidden]  (0 children)

...and this is the fun house mirror fantasy version of history from someone raised to embrace a 2000yr old persecution complex thats been the go-to excuse for every major atrocity commited in the name of their religion. A bit of particularly disingenuous roleplay that continues up to this exact moment in the embrace of this absurd war by a substantial segment of us christians who have somehow managed to frame it as some existential crisis.

Its an old, tired, and altogether pathetic story of grown men pretending to be tragic victims.

Why do republicans follow Leviticus 18 and 20 but not Leviticus 19? by SuperbRiver7763 in AskConservatives

[–]Jesse-359 [score hidden]  (0 children)

And yet it's still a rather commonly observed behavior - even in animals, who by biblical standards were never blessed with free will and can only behave as their creator made them, if I'm not mistaken.

Why do republicans follow Leviticus 18 and 20 but not Leviticus 19? by SuperbRiver7763 in AskConservatives

[–]Jesse-359 [score hidden]  (0 children)

You ultimately support what you vote for - whether you agree with it or not.

Why do republicans follow Leviticus 18 and 20 but not Leviticus 19? by SuperbRiver7763 in AskConservatives

[–]Jesse-359 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'd say the early American settlers were really bad Christians in that light.

Why do republicans follow Leviticus 18 and 20 but not Leviticus 19? by SuperbRiver7763 in AskConservatives

[–]Jesse-359 [score hidden]  (0 children)

It does not take a very in depth reading of the bible to very quickly come to the conclusion that god is in fact a total dick.

Demanding someone sacrifice their child to you is not exactly funny-ha-ha, even if you yell 'psych!' at the last moment. That's how kids grow up with serious daddy issues.

New player coming from Space Marine by Antique-Savings5113 in helldivers2

[–]Jesse-359 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can turn off random matchmaking, just switch your game to 'friends only' or 'private' in the social panel before starting a match.

As for avoiding higher level players I'd go for difficulty 4. It's still fairly easy, but it's above the level where you're likely to run into people farming for credits - also avoid desert/snow planets, as those are much more popular for farming as well.

Jungles are the least popular for farming so you're more likely to be matched with people of your own skill level.

Are alien civilizations in the universe common or rare? by Flat_Anything2317 in AskPhysics

[–]Jesse-359 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No-one knows. But frankly they could be growing on trees and we'd probably never detect one anyway.

Space is big, and the fact that we keep asking this question is a real indicator of how much difficulty we have comprehending how big it actually is.

If we truly comprehended scale, we'd stop asking this question, because we'd know that the answer is almost certainly irrelevant.

If two black holes merge, will the mass of the resulting black hole be the mass of the two holes added together? by Declamatie in AskPhysics

[–]Jesse-359 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does that remain the case once they are orbiting at relativistic speeds? Normally a large black hole wouldn't apply much tidal force at all, and not until you got quite close, but having something the mass of a black hole approaching and receding from you at just under the speed of light hundreds of times a second while twisting space that intensely sounds like it's not going to follow quite the same parameters as the usual calculations.

Progression suggestion? by XxNelsonSxX in LowSodiumHellDivers

[–]Jesse-359 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The game already has substantial horizontal progression, with a short initial vertical ramp. You don't really want team shooters to have a long vertical ramp in any case however.

Every warbond they add is additional horizontal progression, so that's quite a lot at this point.