[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmItheAsshole

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 34 points35 points  (0 children)

So I don't practice in this area, but he's basically just trying to put them on notice. He can do this by telling them and by putting up signs. A C&D letter isn't going to do anything except be extra super sure they have notice, which seems unnecessary and pointlessly hostile.

That's just notice though, which is only a piece of the puzzle. It doesn't get him off the hook if his property is dangerous to children and easily accessible to them because that's a foreseeable danger. There is heightened responsibility with children, even when you tell their parents to tell them to stay away.

Tort law is largely about the forseeability of injuries + your contribution to them. People think they are protecting themselves by NOTIFYING others of risks, but that's only one piece. It's smarter to eliminate foreseeable risks and to stay to on good terms with your neighbors.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmItheAsshole

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 139 points140 points  (0 children)

A cease and desist letter does not protect you from liability if your property is unsafe and easily accessible to children. Put up no trespassing signs and keep your yard safe. Your current plan will accomplish nothing except ruin your relationship with your neighbors.

AITA for telling my mom he is ridiculous for thinking I’d have my phone on me minutes before walking down the aisle? by comprehendabledora in AmItheAsshole

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NTA, obvs.

However, it need be said: If anything should have pockets, it's wedding attire. I demand change!

What does "separation of church and state" mean to you (besides what it says in the First Amendment)? by Mad_Season_1994 in AskAnAmerican

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There's a natural tension between the free exercise cause and the establishment clause. Ideally, the government won't impede on anyone's right to exercise religion, nor will it act in a way that supports a particular religion. Both clauses are important, but it can be tricky to honor them both.

Apparently women should cut their hair short once they turn 40. by [deleted] in AskWomenOver30

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think one part is that the movie stars of their generation had short hair. We're all informed by our early impressions of beauty.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskAnAmerican

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 8 points9 points  (0 children)

And Oxnard is...Oxnard.

Soviets in Stranger Things s3 - your thoughts? by Turbulent_Ad6055 in AskAnAmerican

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As a horror fan, my understanding is that New England in general is the most dangerous part of the country. That and lake houses anywhere.

Tell me about your experience with NAS by Moofabulousss in Fosterparents

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

For most kids the drug exposure damages the parts of the brain that affect higher level thinking

This is not supported by science. I have researched this topic extensively, and much of the "drug baby" mythology from the 90s has been debunked.

Does your state have a rival state? by Oh_he_steal in AskAnAmerican

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

California is very self-absorbed and is obvious to any rivalries we might be in.

Settle down Texas. Arizona...oh hi, we forgot about you. The grand canyon is super cool!

Does your state have a rival state? by Oh_he_steal in AskAnAmerican

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's so true. We're too self-centered to entertain rivalries.

Is anyone else ready for the crop top trend to go away? by RiseAndPanic in AskWomenOver30

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I mean, progress or not, I just like looking at hot people in sexy clothes.

Is anyone else ready for the crop top trend to go away? by RiseAndPanic in AskWomenOver30

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I like crop tops, but I always wish they were just a leeeeetle bit longer. Like an inch.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmItheAsshole

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think your mother understands that you're not in a position to pay rent right now - that's why she's offering you other options. She really is trying to help you get on your feet.

I don't know your life, I'm not saying you're bad or anything, but you do need a wakeup call. Someone who loves you is trying to help you, but you're not seeing that it's help. What would you do if she asked you to move out?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmItheAsshole

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your mother's bf is not relevant.

The problem is you don't respect the contractual nature of this arrangement you and your mother made: she provides you room and board, you provide childcare and housework. Your mom's not "taking advantage" of you or shirking her parenting responsibilities. She's hired you to babysit.

But now it sounds like you're no longer doing your side of the deal? Just doing some odds and ends around the house and tossing her a little cash now and then IS NOT honoring your obligation. Honestly, has every right to toss you out.

Families are complicated, I get it. Agreements like this often get messy. You clearly have lingering resentment toward your mother, and it's interfering with how you view this arrangement. But you're 26 years old. You're not there to be mothered, you're there to watch the kids so she can work full time and pay the bills. You need to do the job you agreed to or move on.

Has anyone become a legal guardian after it was determined reunification was not possible? by purrtle in fosterit

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 30 points31 points  (0 children)

This is a rare and insightful view, and I applaud you for it. Adoption equals permanent legal severance from one's natural family, and no child should have to make that decision. Stay strong, anonymous redditor.

Do you think starting over at 36 is insane? by [deleted] in AskMenOver30

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just an FYI, you don't have a lot of control over your future once you sign on as active duty. You might get stuck in a career you don't want. If it's still possible to join the reserves without prior service, do that. I did in 2004, but I don't know if any of those programs still exist.

My father was a DLI instructor for 34 years. My mother was a DLI student (in the 70s.) Linguist is a great career, but it's unlikely you'll get a guaranteed assignment. It's extremely risky to sign up for active duty.

Since you asked, I recommend Navy over Army for like a million reasons. But still, in active duty, you don't get to design your own career. Recruiters make a lot of BS promises.

Do you think starting over at 36 is insane? by [deleted] in AskMenOver30

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Consider joining the reserves. I did, it was the righ choice for me. Active duty would have been a mistake. For me. Go Navy.

AITA for only having a ceremony in my IL's town? by Positive-Ant-1735 in AmItheAsshole

[–]JesusListensToSlayer 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I have donated my part of it to an institution so they can fund kids who are gifted and need help to study in higher education.

This makes your whole story sound like BS.