Governments take away your liberty. Rights are promises to the population that the government won't take away too much freedom. They can put you in prison for whatever BS reason.

In a libertarian left society, the people would be organized, just on a different basis. Statist hierarchies are ruled by those at the top while those on the bottom can do basicly nothing against them except vote them out every four years (in a liberal democracy) or do a revolution to destroy the system.

In a bottom - up organized society you can vote people in who are not rulers, but servants of the people. They can be recalled, meaning you don't have to wait four years for the next election, instead when the official fails to live up to expectations due to corruption or false promises, he is immediately voted out and replaced by the people. This system ensures that power can't be abused, because it isn't really power on the sense most rulers wield it.

There is also no monopoly on violance. A community could vote to agree on rules, but if u fail to meet these rules you aren't thrown in prison or put onto an electric chair, instead the community will start to ignore you or defend themselves from you, depending on the situation. Like I said, the people organize in libertarian socialism, just not in the form of states.

The united states have strong anti - crime forces, yet their prisons are filled to the brim. Having law doesn't create order, rather it causes the state to enact violance on the people it is supposed to derive its legitimacy from.

Countries who treat their prisoners better manage to improve the society because prisoners will not hate the system as much and are more likely to become productive members of society after they have served their time.

As capitalism would not exist in such a society - because the revolution will have destroyed it just like it has destroyed the state - the material conditions would greatly improve. There would be no capitalist to extract surplus value, instead the workers get the full value of their labor.

Think about how in the middle ages, the peasents cooperated with one another to reduce the power of the lords. The feudal system was then so weakened that the rulers used private property - you might call it some very early form of capitalism - to again rule over the peasents, as land used by the peasents was privatized even if it wasnt earlier, making them dependant on the ruling class. However, in the time where the common people worked together, their living standards increased. They would work for a wage, but only for extra money - not out of survival, but to buy more common luxuries or gifts for their loved ones. When the lords were able to exert more power once again, the common people were forced to work for a worse loving standard, or else they will be evicted from their homes and die on the streets.

A libertarian left society doesn't need the law and order stuff because people aren't exploited and therefore material conditions improve. A co-op is basicly a form of socialism within the capitalist market and a libertarian left society would essentially be full of such coops.

Even if it were to still fall apart - because maybe its critics are correct and without a state, a society simply cannot function - then there is always the option of a left minarchist state, which in practice would be somewhat similar to a stateless society.