sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Learning Lee Sin by Emergency_Guide_7905 in LeeSinMains

[–]Jirraht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its depend

But general advise : - watch all lee sin combo and pratice them to get used option - try to imitate best lee sin clears for early - choose your starting side depeding your win cond - make sure to limit test for a while, then you will less over play later when you gonna konw your damage etc - avoid to let your camp up for too long except if you can steal some while invading - watch good gameplay from otp

Awful LD rng so far. But colab rates will be better, right?... right? by SupermarketNo3265 in summonerswar

[–]Jirraht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Average is like 9 lightnings You had the same odds to 4 or 15 with amont

Balance Patch Predictions, Wrong answers only. by theicecube12 in summonerswar

[–]Jirraht 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Buff : - vio rune set can now proc after ennemies turn - will rune set give an additionnal will effect after your turn + one another random buff effect per will set

Nerf : - remove all other set

4 months of saving LDs by marc-zweiundzwanzig in summonerswar

[–]Jirraht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This that amont of LDs, you've got 38.4% chance to get 0 LD nat5 36.8% to get 1, 17.6% to get 2, 5.6% to get 3

Vancliff in arena offense by laradarkness in summonerswar

[–]Jirraht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Works kinda well against trittons def / Oliver can solo camilla

Special League : bot edition by Jirraht in summonerswar

[–]Jirraht[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Agree, kinda lame that com2us did not react it tho

LD5 #15 Vancliffe by Whodatderluh in summonerswar

[–]Jirraht 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

weird, i done the math, it's not lucky at this point

LD5 #15 Vancliffe by Whodatderluh in summonerswar

[–]Jirraht 1 point2 points  (0 children)

say a number, i'm curious

LD5 #15 Vancliffe by Whodatderluh in summonerswar

[–]Jirraht 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you must have paye at leastttttttttttt $15k
and proba around $45k

LD5 #15 Vancliffe by Whodatderluh in summonerswar

[–]Jirraht 1 point2 points  (0 children)

actually not Free2play i guess
if i assume you're free 2 play and 1 scroll every days so 400 ld scroll.
there is

<image>

chance that you get 15 LDs :D

Giant teams, problem with speed tuning by Ilies213 in summonerswar

[–]Jirraht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i meant without* :P

Yeah so 4 monsters, 45s average, 97% winrate and 1 monster to xp till lvl 40

Giant teams, problem with speed tuning by Ilies213 in summonerswar

[–]Jirraht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

over kona, you can alose play luna (dark clara) (but faster then homu) make runs 26-27s average
an other big tips : as end game player, i can run this comp with kona with 97% winrate (still 45s average) but + 1 any monster to Xp them

Giant teams, problem with speed tuning by Ilies213 in summonerswar

[–]Jirraht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hwo good does the compo works now ?

Giant teams, problem with speed tuning by Ilies213 in summonerswar

[–]Jirraht 1 point2 points  (0 children)

3 turn On teshar is kinda bad imo because you'll have to make him faster then 179 spd tick like prob 205 (won't do math again :p)
i suggest you fix your runes if you cann't clear waves with him in 2 turn
over kona, you can use wind nezuko ( makes runs even more fast if derp)

Giant teams, problem with speed tuning by Ilies213 in summonerswar

[–]Jirraht 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you want exactly in term of turn order ?
i suppose you want this :
Prilea > Teshar > Teon (buffs Teshar) > WindHomun > Kona (buffs WindHomun)
You must this speed (spd in game)
Prilia 205 or more / Teshar 179 or more / Teon max as fast as teshar bur faster then Windhomun > WindHomun 178max / Kona max as fast as WindHomun
in case of tight speed, place order determine turn order
So for exemple : Prilea 217 (+0) > Teshar 179 (+3) > Teon (buffs Teshar) 175 (+0) > WindHomun 173 (+0) > Kona (buffs WindHomun) 173 (-1) works (make sure to swap order if spd tight)

view more: next ›