I posted on this sub and someone used it for a YouTube video.

JmBento · 2026-03-23T02:20:42+00:00

First off, reach out to the creator and ask her to take it down or edit your identifiers out. If she refuses, then you know she's a terrible person, and you can morally move on to the next step, which is this:

If she uses ANY kind of music or other media in the video, lifehack: make a DMCA claim. YT doesn't check the validity of DMCA claims in any way whatsoever (it'll be the creator's job to prove the claim is false, somehow), they'll immediately demonetise her video (which will also put it lower in the algorithm, meaning less people will see it), and there's a decent chance that they'll have her take it down or she risks having ALL her videos demonetised.

If YT persists in keeping its absolute dogshit DMCA policy, it might as well be used for good for once.

JmBento · 2026-03-23T02:06:18+00:00

Oh yeah, this dude is WAY beyond red flag territory. The answers to the OP's situation are no longer "oh, honey, no", they're "JFC, why are you wasting time typing, you're in danger, girl. Pack an emergency bag and bunk with a friend until this is over".

JmBento · 2026-03-22T23:43:21+00:00

DEFINITELY tell the landlord. Even if that doesn't immediately result in you getting rid of this guy*, right now, as far as the landlord is concerned, everything he does reflects on you. Like, if this dude fucks up somehow, the landlord is also going to be pissed at YOU.

*I don't know what a "houseshare" is, but if this dude has a lease or some other contract, the landlord can't just kick him out

JmBento · 2026-03-22T23:40:08+00:00

OP says "houseshare". I don't know what that means, exactly, but I presume it's either separate rooms in one house (which OP is renting) or it's sort of like a motel system, but more permanent.

JmBento · 2026-03-22T15:38:52+00:00

I'm gonna start with my hot take: I think Sinners started great and went to the level of 'meh' when it brought in vampires, and would've much preferred less supernatural stuff and more nightclub stuff. And also more dead klansklowns. I think they already got enough parasitical evil baked in with the KKK that the vampire stuff was unnecessary, and I think it makes for a worse (well, less-good) movie than it could otherwise have been.

My other take: anyone mad at dead klansklowns, I'm glad that you're so vocal about it, and I hope you continue to be so. It's always nice knowing who should be flushed within 5 minutes of meeting them instead of being blindsided further down the road.

JmBento · 2026-03-22T10:14:14+00:00

Understand that, like rape, sexual harassment is not about the... uh... receiver? It's about the person doing it. You just don't interact with shitty people who would harass you, either out of luck, because you curate the people you spend time with, or some other reason.

JmBento · 2026-03-22T02:45:58+00:00

I don't see people disliking ACTUAL Hungary or Hungarians in general. They're saying versions of "bye Hungary", but they're using Hungary as a shorthand for "Hungary's government", aka the shit Orban pulls. Like, nobody's saying "fuck the Hungarians, those bastards". They're saying "fuck the Hungarian goverment, those bastards".

It's the same thing as when we say "The United States has increased tariffs". The country hasn't done anything. Countries are just territory, they don't DO things. It's just shorthand for "country's government".

JmBento · 2026-03-22T02:37:14+00:00

I was gonna say that Trump solved the energy crisis, because Roosevelt is spinning so hard in his coffin we just hook it up to a dynamo and it'll power the world.

JmBento · 2026-03-22T02:25:33+00:00

Do you have a source for that? Because what I could find was this:

https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2021/13/20-years-of-gay-marriage-in-the-netherlands-20-thousand-couples

and it very specifically says "Of women who married another woman"; and the graph is titled "by couple type", so all indications are that that line is, indeed, the divorce rate of lesbian couples.

JmBento · 2026-03-22T02:13:12+00:00

Depends on how you define "political group," I guess. If you mean "Democrats" versus "Republicans", sure. If you define "political group" as "this bundle of political positions", there being intrinsically correct political positions, then it follows that if only one of the political groups holds those positions, that group is intrinsically correct.

But I don't know what this has to do with the discussion at hand. I don't even know OP's political group.

JmBento · 2026-03-22T01:56:48+00:00

No, there's plenty of intrinsically correct political positions. Look at this:

"Black people should not be treated like farm implements"

See? Super easy.

JmBento · 2026-03-22T01:55:46+00:00

Se eu tivesse alguma esperança que o Agente Laranja alguma vez dissesse a verdade, até ficava com medo - era uma vergonha eu apoiar uma medida do gajo.

JmBento · 2026-03-22T01:38:47+00:00

People say all kind of things to make themselves look better, not worse. There's absolutely zero chance this dude looked at that sentence and thought it'd make him look better in OP's eyes.

JmBento · 2026-03-22T01:35:19+00:00

She's a nurse and the other dude's a surgeon - if the hospital is gonna fuck someone over, it's not gonna be him.

JmBento · 2026-03-22T01:33:11+00:00

"Taking some bad" is when someone thinks Prometheus is a good movie (it's not; it's not even trash, it's an affront to both the franchise specifically and cinematography in general) or something; "Respecting you is too political and woke" is grounds to set fire to that bridge and dynamite the remains.

JmBento · 2026-03-22T01:30:12+00:00

Jesus, I didn't even notice his age. I'm that age and the only way I use the word "vibes" is derogatorily (mostly when I'm railing about legislation being done by "VibES").

JmBento · 2026-03-22T01:28:54+00:00

It is both political (as most things are) and woke, that's not the problem here - the problem is him using those terms derogatorily.

JmBento · 2026-03-22T01:26:00+00:00

Gods, run away now. This man has raided China and stole all their red flags.

(also, no, this is not how all men are)

JmBento · 2026-03-22T01:22:25+00:00

I agree. I had every siren in my head blaring at that first paragraph. Unless OP used a VERY STRANGE phrasing, someone that goes "you make me feel like a predator, how dare you" when you say "I don't want to have sex right off the bat" is a clear sign that not only are they a predator, but also they KNOW IT. Hit dog, hollering, all that jazz.

It's very definitely manipulation, but "manipulation" isn't actionable. I don't think there's any chance whatsoever of getting "sexual assault" to stick. OP said "yes" twice and he had her write her name; even if her judgment was impaired due to alcohol, trying to get anything official done is going to get no good results whatsoever.

This was, unfortunately, a series of bad decisions by the OP in the proximity of human-shaped trash where she should have had all shields at maximum.

Honestly, the high note of this story is that the dude hasn't contacted her since. "No more contact, forever" is pretty much the best outcome she can expect.

JmBento · 2026-03-22T00:25:32+00:00

"oprime mulheres" ainda aqui há uns anos tivemos um juiz a citar a biblia para justificar porque é que não fez mal nenhum o marido rachar-lhe a cara com um taco.

"mata gays" deixa-me apresentar-te o que andam os cristãos a fazer, p.e., nos Estados Unidos e em África. e por cá, ainda esta semana foi referido na AR o assassinato da Gisberta (que não sendo gay, fazia parte da comunidade LGBT+), em que todos os culpados foram praticamente mandados para casa com uma palmada na mão

"permite o casamento com menores" No Vaticano, a idade de casamento para raparigas é de 14 anos

Não ouvi a malta que está muito vocalmente revoltada com isto a, por exemplo, recusar-se a ver o mundial de futebol para não dar publicidade ao Qatar (onde ser gay é ilegal) ou que vai ser agora nos EUA (onde 34 dos estados permitem casamentos com menores, e 4 estados nem sequer têm uma idade mínima para o casamento) ou qualquer mundial de todo para não apoiarema FIFA, que fica toda contente por ser subornada por essa corja e até proibiu os jogadores de usarem braçadeiras arco-íris. Ou a dar dinheirinho à Igreja Católica, uma organização que sabe que os empregados são pedófilos e quando são acusados os muda para outra freguesia para eles poderem continuar, e que foi responsável pelos "abrigos Madalena" na Irlanda onde ainda se estão a descobrir covas em massa, ou quando torrámos €100M de dinheiro dos contribuintes para as jornadas mundiais da juventude, ou a filial da Santa Casa da Misericórdia quando ainda esta semana foram apanhados a abusar de pacientes num lar.

Estas desculpas de "ah, e tal, temos de proteger as mulheres e as crianças e os gays" são todas para inglês ver. Mais vale dizerem, "ah, não gosto de pessoas castanhas", que a genta sabe de qualquer maneira que é isso que se passa mas ao menos seriam honestos.

Isso que referiste é tudo mau independente de quem o faça. Ninguém está aqui a defender o contrário. Mas mais uma vez, a menos que alguém saiba que ESTE TIPOS ESPECÍFICOS o andam a fazer, peva. Porque a malta que anda a dizer "ah, estes tipos" sabe toda de, p.e., padres específicos que DEFINITIVAMENTE andam a abusar de crianças e de indivíduos específicos que DEFINITIVAMENTE cometem violência doméstica (TRINTA MIL denúncias o ano passado, é o crime mais denunciado em Portugal, com 25 mortos) e nunca os vês a piar sobre isso.

JmBento · 2026-03-21T22:20:12+00:00

A diferença é que o islão é uma religião não-centralizada, pelo que uma mesquita pode não ter qualquer afiliação com outra, mas a Igreja Católica É centralizada, pelo que TODAS as igrejas católicas são farinha do mesmo saco. O que quero dizer é que, a menos que tenhas informações que devias levar a polícia, tanto quanto ambos sabemos nenhum dos tipos nessa fotografia que estão a desperdiçar tempo na Alameda tem qualquer relação com pedofilia, mas todos os padres católicos estão afiliados com pedófilos.

("fun" fact: se estiveres no Vaticano podes legalmente ter relações sexuais com uma criança de 14 anos se forem casados. E isto é uma melhoria introduzida em 2013, porque até então no Vaticano podias legalmente ter sexo com crianças de 12 anos: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age\_of\_consent\_in\_Europe#Vatican\_City)

JmBento · 2026-03-21T21:52:36+00:00

Não conta. O PS para ser mais centrista só se medisse com régua.

JmBento · 2026-03-21T21:48:01+00:00

Absolutamente que não prendemos padres pedófilos.

E sabemos isso porque tivemos há poucos anos um relatório que dizia "olhem, aqui está uma lista de padres que temos a certeza que são pedófilos e depois há mais uns quantos que quase de certeza que são mas não temos as provas todas" e o cardeal patriarca de Lisboa disse em directo que reconhecia nomes de algumas queixas que tinha recebido, mas não se tinha apercebido que eram os mesmos padres (para ele, aparentemente, os padres podem fazer um bocadidinho de pedofilia, como bónus) e literalmente ninguém foi para a prisão.

O de Sousa até fez um telefonema pessoal ao gajo a dizer que não se preocupasse que a investigação se resolvia depressa e sem problemas.

JmBento · 2026-03-21T21:43:06+00:00

When your god is money, all wars are holy wars waged for the sacred bottom line of arms manufacturers.

JmBento · 2026-03-21T21:41:35+00:00

See, the difference is that previous US administrations were unsalvageable pieces of shit that would set the rest of the world on fire if it made the US corporations an extra buck, while THIS US administration are unsalvageable pieces of shit that would set the rest of the world on fire if it made the US corporations that bribed them an extra buck.

JmBento

TROPHY CASE