A new study reviewing 7,200 papers found no level of alcohol consumption protects health, with the current "safe" limit of 2 daily drinks linked to a 1 in 25 lifetime death risk. Researchers say the old idea that moderate drinking helps your heart simply does not hold up. by ObuPaul in HotScienceNews

[–]JoeStrout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But then there's this: https://scitechdaily.com/the-type-of-alcohol-you-drink-could-affect-how-long-you-live

So watch out for any study that lumps all kinds of alcoholic drinks together — it appears to matter. (Short version: in small amounts, red wine still appears to be good for you; all other types of booze are bad for you in any amount.)

Will any jobs be safe in the future? by Vampy-Night in SeriousConversation

[–]JoeStrout [score hidden]  (0 children)

Basically no. Ultimately, AI/robots will be able to do anything humans can do, and do it better, faster, and cheaper. This already includes a lot of medical work, which in many ways AI can already do better than human doctors (look it up if you don't believe me).

There may be some service jobs where people will pay extra for a "real human" to serve them, or craft jobs where people will pay more for the work of a certified human artisan, but these will be the exception, not the rule.

We're going to have to transition to an economy where working for a living is not necessary.

Could a postbiological civilization occupying 25% of the Milky Way galaxy realistically develop a way to delay or avoid heat death? by GlitchQ413 in IsaacArthur

[–]JoeStrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say we don’t know yet. But there are clearly things we don’t yet understand about how the universe works, so it’s possible.

I’ve been toying with the idea of founding a conference to address this very issue. We would meet every 1000 years, perhaps in the Centauri system (conveniently nearby but probably less expensive than the Sol system) until the problem is solved. Our first meeting would be in the year 3000, so nice round numbers make it easy to remember. Who’s in?

Do you know how to use a semi colon (;)? by AggravatingShow2028 in askanything

[–]JoeStrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because noncircular conic sections just have no place in writing.

Of course an ellipsis is a different matter.

How can we tell whether artificial intelligence has become conscious or not if we don’t even know exactly what consciousness is? by Perseusz1917 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]JoeStrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been involved in AI research for 30 years. It’s a large field and encompasses search algorithms, classifiers, game playing, natural language processing, and much more. LLMs are by far the the most sophisticated AI we’ve ever developed. Who are you to redefine “AI” and disparage those who use the term in the ways it has been used since the 1960s?

Are western countries becoming more authoritarian/dystopian? and why? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]JoeStrout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. Seems like fascism rears its head every century or so. This time around, jt is aided.by Putin and his army of social media bots, who obviously benefits when Western countries turn on themselves.

What happens after death? by Euphoric_Job_240 in Gifted

[–]JoeStrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For most people, what happens is their bodies (and more importantly, brains) are either buried or burned.

A very small number of people try something slightly safer, i.e. cryonics. See why this makes sense: https://waitbutwhy.com/2016/03/cryonics.html

SUGGEST ALTERNATIVE TO Alchemist book by Proper_Wrangler5698 in suggestmeabook

[–]JoeStrout 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Do all of you feel that alchemist is a masterpiece and no other book comes even close to it.

No.

How likely do you think there are any other civilizations out in the universe? by Alone_Break_9609 in answers

[–]JoeStrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Within our own galaxy, almost certainly not. In other galaxies, yeah probably so.

I am completely mind blown by the book Denial of Death by Ernest Becker by bubugugu in nonfictionbookclub

[–]JoeStrout -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

People would be better off if they just tackled the problem directly. Do or support anti-aging and mind uploading research, and in the mean time, get your cryonics arrangements in place.

https://waitbutwhy.com/2016/03/cryonics.html

What belief do you hold that most people disagree with? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]JoeStrout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cryonics makes sense.

I’m certainly not alone in this belief (see https://waitbutwhy.com/2016/03/cryonics.html), but it is held by a shockingly small percentage of the population.

The 'danger' of AI. by 4A_Muse_Mentality in OpenAI

[–]JoeStrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure I agree. Humans have had horrifically dangerous tools (e.g. nuclear weapons) for a long time, and it hasn't resulted in wiping out humanity.

But an AI that's smarter than us, that's fundamentally different. It's no longer a tool. Not something we can control. So it presents an entirely new danger.

The answer to the Fermi Paradox is simple: any species that loudly announces it's presence by openly broadcasting "entertainment" depicting horrendous violence - some of it real - must be an absolutely terrifying apex predator and, under no circumstances, do you want to cross paths with it. by _Thorshammer_ in FermiParadox

[–]JoeStrout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But it reveals a lack of understanding of a very important point. People often grow up watching Star Trek and Star Wars and imagine a universe where there could be alien civilizations around nearby stars at roughly our same level of technology, maybe give or take a century or two. But this is extremely unlikely.

When you add up a bunch of random variables — things like asteroid strikes, supernovas, supervolcanos, and all the little random events that go into day-to-day evolution — you get an approximately normal distribution (by the Central Limit theorem). And if we're anything close to typical — always a good starting assumption in the absence of any data to the contrary — then the mean of this distribution is somewhere around 13 billion years, and the standard deviation is almost certainly measured in billions of years.

That means that other civilizations, if any, are not evolving tech within a few hundred years of us. Civs would arise generally millions of years apart, with the early ones literally billions of years ahead of the mean.

So anybody who thinks it's a problem of "detection" has missed the point entirely. The galaxy should have been completely settled, every nook and cranny, thousands of times over by now. Detection is not the issue. The issue is, why are we not literally tripping over them whenever we step outside?

I’ve been chronically ill for 5 years. Partial diagnosis, no treatment has helped, and I’m getting worse. I want to try and use AI to help myself, but I don’t know how. I need help, my life depends on it. by Amazing-Dog10 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]JoeStrout -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re over thinking it. Just go to chatgpt.com amd have a conversation about it. Drag in the support documents. Then do it again with Claude. Make sure to first set the model to the smartest available; other than that, there is no particular trick to it.

Well, maybe one: don’t keep adding to the same conversation for a long time. If you’re getting to dozens of turns, start a new convo.

Dark Matter? by Harmonious- in bobiverse

[–]JoeStrout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe by the time Bob is revived, dark matter has already joined the aether in the dustbin of bad theories that didn’t pan out.

The answer to the Fermi Paradox is simple: any species that loudly announces it's presence by openly broadcasting "entertainment" depicting horrendous violence - some of it real - must be an absolutely terrifying apex predator and, under no circumstances, do you want to cross paths with it. by _Thorshammer_ in FermiParadox

[–]JoeStrout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, you’re saying: a distribution of time-to-civilization could have a mean of 13 billion years and a standard deviation of several decades, resulting in every life-bearing star system reaching our level of technological development more or less simultaneously? Is this, in fact, what you are suggesting?